Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Crypto Era

@OfficialCryptoEra

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

156,507subscribers

+27,327 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001130656689
TypeChannel
Username@OfficialCryptoEra
DescriptionLearn about crypto market trends with charts, technical analysis, and market commentary. Stay informed with Crypto Era. Support: @henary_Smith
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OfficialCryptoEra

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Crypto_Matrx/56516 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC@OfficialCryptoEra/16257 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@Crypto_Matrx/56566 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC@OfficialCryptoEra/16262 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC1.00under a minute
@Crypto_Matrx/56576 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC@OfficialCryptoEra/16263 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC1.00under a minute
@Crypto_Matrx/56586 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC@OfficialCryptoEra/16264 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC1.00under a minute
@Crypto_Matrx/56666 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC@OfficialCryptoEra/16272 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC0.98under a minute
@Crypto_Matrx/56626 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC@OfficialCryptoEra/16268 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC0.94under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Crypto_Matrx7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.98under a minute@Crypto_Matrx (61)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @Crypto_Matrx. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

127,857156,905142,3816 August 2026 — 129,180 subscribers6 August 2026 — 129,180 subscribers7 August 2026 — 129,051 subscribers8 August 2026 — 128,216 subscribers9 August 2026 — 128,472 subscribers10 August 2026 — 127,857 subscribers11 August 2026 — 156,905 subscribers12 August 2026 — 156,507 subscribers156,5076 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +27,327. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 123,500–161,262 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:55156,507-398
11 Aug 2026, 14:24156,905+29,048
10 Aug 2026, 13:27127,857-615
9 Aug 2026, 12:51128,472+256
8 Aug 2026, 09:34128,216-835
7 Aug 2026, 07:20129,051-129
6 Aug 2026, 21:00129,180no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:48129,180first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.0%
avg views ÷ 156,507 subscribers
Avg views / post
51,600
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held51 (6 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total2,323,800
Reactions total249,345
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
977
Videos
37
Links
571

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 52s
Average length
4m 52s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

249,345 reactions across 45 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍42,64317.1%
🎉42,24816.9%
42,16216.9%
🔥42,00216.8%
🥰38,18315.3%
👏37,77615.2%
😁4,3311.74%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 249,345reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTC≈25,100 views23,000 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Champions, how much did you make from yesterday’s pump? 💰🤑

  1. 💸 5BNB-25BNB21%
  2. 🔥 25BNB-100BNB46%
  3. 🚀 100BNB+30%
  4. I missed the pump. I'm waiting for the next one 😅3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍3,9403,900🔥3,840🥰3,840👏3,770🎉3,710

10 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC≈57,100 views4,887 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Today, everyone, give yourselves a huge pat on the back! We've accomplished something truly incredible! 🔥 The growth today hit an astounding 743.64% - it's simply amazing 🚀 This achievement is a testament to our collective efforts and the incredible support from each one of you🏆 Thank you all for your unwavering dedication and support throughout this journey. Today, take a moment to relax and celebrate this new s

👍857🎉835🥰811807👏799🔥778

10 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC≈61,200 views4,677 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❗️❗️❗️SELLING RIGHT NOW TEAM❗️❗️❗️ ✅ 💰💰💰 OMG, JUST WATCH! IT'S INCREDIBLE 🔥 LETS TAKE THE PROOOFIT 💪🔥 If you have any questions, ✍write me! @henary_smith

809👏799🎉790👍789🥰762🔥728

10 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC≈64,900 views4,375 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🥰785754👍748🎉716🔥690👏682

10 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC≈68,200 views5,008 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Today we have HUGE growth because it’s a REAL GEM ✅ The most confident guys have been invested even before the pump Sometimes you need to go on a risk, but if you really want to get good profit it’s just a necessary. I do it every time with you Increase your deposits and get ready to see the largest profits in your wallets 🔥 LETS GOOO If you have any questions, ✍️write me! ✍️ @henary_smith

860👍851🔥848🎉842👏817🥰790

10 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC≈71,000 views5,004 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

GOGOGO! ⚡️⚡️⚡️ I advise you not to stop on the achieved, because the coin already shows high growth, and we just started 🤝🤑 I ADVISE YOU TO BUY 🚀 If you have any questions, ✍write me! ✍ @henary_smith

874👍867🎉860🔥814👏798🥰791

10 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC≈56,800 views4,997 reactionsread 12 August 2026

REAL GEM ✅ The most confident guys have been invested even before the pump Increase your deposits and get ready to see the largest profits If you have any questions, ✍️write me! ✍️@henary_smith

🎉875👍859🔥834👏827🥰803799

10 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC≈55,300 views5,003 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BUY THE DIP 🍀 I KNOW THAT THERE WILL BE AN EVEN BIGGER INCREASE!🔥 I BOUGHT MORE COINS! BUY More atleast 5BNB each participant! ⭐️⭐️ If you have any questions, ✍write me! ✍@henary_smith

🥰872🎉851🔥840👏823👍812805

10 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC≈56,800 views4,718 reactionsread 12 August 2026

FEEL THE MOMENT AND KEEP BUYING 💪 🔶ADDRESS CONTRACT ⤵️ 🚫THIS PUMP IS FINISHED 🚫 (We deleted the purchase link and the contract address Because beginners get confused and buy a token after the pump is over!) 🐰 Pancakeswap Link ⤵️ 🚫THIS PUMP IS FINISHED 🚫 (We deleted the purchase link and the contract address Because beginners get confused and buy a token after the pump is over!)

👍824🥰821🎉820777🔥765👏711

10 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC≈56,500 views4,999 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Guys, investing in a coin and holding it for months or even years just to make a few percent profit isn't our style. 💎 We aim for multiple X gains on every opportunity. Just buy, wait a few hours, and watch how hard we pump and how much profit we can generate together. 🔥 We are buying with more than 700 BNB worth of buying power. 💪 Load up and get ready! Let's Goooo 🚀🚀🚀

👏879👍845🔥827822🎉818🥰808

10 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC≈56,300 views4,741 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Guys this call will change your life. Just buy as much you can. Our target is huge. It's just once opportunity in a week. Done miss this gem 💎 Since we have just started - buy as much as possible to maximize your deposits in a few hours Lets Goooo 💪💪💪

818🥰811🔥788👍787👏778🎉759

10 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC≈56,400 views5,000 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🎉851🔥837836👏835👍823🥰818

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @OfficialCryptoEra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTCAnonymous Poll22,800 voters approx.

Champions, how much did you make from yesterday’s pump? 💰🤑

  1. 💸 5BNB-25BNB21%
  2. 🔥 25BNB-100BNB46%
  3. 🚀 100BNB+30%
  4. I missed the pump. I'm waiting for the next one 😅3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTCAnonymous Poll22,500 voters approx.

Champions, how much did you make from yesterday’s pump? 💰🤑

  1. 💸 5BNB-25BNB21%
  2. 🔥 25BNB-100BNB45%
  3. 🚀 100BNB+31%
  4. I missed the pump. I'm waiting for the next one 😅3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Era” (@OfficialCryptoEra), 156,507 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OfficialCryptoEra.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.