Channel
@Oceanfaminfo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001955632218 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Oceanfaminfo |
| Description | 𝐎𝐰𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐬 @Miksilen |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Oceanfaminfo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 8 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 8 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
17 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 52.9% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 23.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2023 to 27 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
—★Hello dear 🐚★— Сегодня я спешу сообщить вам важную новость, а именно рассказать о том, что наш чат вновь открывается. Владелец за это время отдохнул, набрался сил и решил, что готов вновь продолжить вести свой чат, который за это время стал очень дорог. Хочу сказать большое спасибо всем Олдам, которые помогли мне взять себя в руки и подтолкнули к открытию. Еще одна важная новость заключается в том, что …
❤1
Channel name was changed to «𝗢𝗰𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝗳𝗮𝗺 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗼 🐚 #𝗢𝗳 (закрыт)»
—★Hello dear 🐚★— Сегодня я хочу сообщить о закрытии чата на неопределённое время (возможно навсегда). Сейчас у владельца слишком мало свободного времени и нет желания вести чат. Хочу сказать спасибо всем кто был с нами все это время, кто показывал активность в каналах и общался в чате. У меня осталось очень много хороших воспоминаний о времени, когда в чате было очень активно и комфортно, но сейчас я решила …
🔥1
🍪Hello dear🍪 Хочу поздравить вас с наступающим новым годом.⛸ Желаем вам счастья, здоровье и много-много денег.🕯 Пусть 2024 принесёт вам больше радостных и меньше грустных моментов🎄 Желаем хорошо провести время с друзьями и родными🎄 Благодарим всех кто с нами с самого начала, а так же тех кто присоединился к нам недавно. Нам очень важно ваше внимание🎁 👼 Ещё раз с наступающим
🔥1
—★Дни рождения ★— 𝐖𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫 15.12 𝐇𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐌𝐢𝐤𝐚𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐨𝐧 07.01 𝐒𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐒𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐤𝐢 22.01 𝐃𝐞𝐚𝐧 𝐖𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 07.02 𝐀𝐧𝐧𝐞 𝐒𝐡𝐢𝐫𝐥𝐞𝐲 𝐂𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐭 𝐒𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 20.03 𝐄𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐚 𝐆𝐢𝐥𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐭 21.03 𝐊𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐏𝐢𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐞 23.03 𝐍𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐥𝐚𝐮𝐬 𝐌𝐢𝐤𝐚𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐨𝐧 12.04 𝐑𝐞𝐛𝐞𝐤𝐚𝐡 𝐌𝐢𝐤𝐚𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐨𝐧 12.04 𝐋𝐲𝐝𝐢𝐚 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧 10.05 𝐇𝐚𝐲𝐥𝐞𝐲 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐒𝐮𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐫 30.07 𝐉𝐨𝐳𝐞𝐭 𝐒𝐚𝐥𝐳𝐦𝐚𝐧 09.08 𝐌𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐚 𝐇𝐚𝐥𝐞 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐦𝐧 04.11 𝐊𝐨𝐥 𝐌𝐢𝐤𝐚𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐨𝐧
🔥1
—★Hello dear 🐚★— Мы сново устраиваем дод на время выходных. Правила будут ниже,просим каждого заходящего придерживаться их: ☆не спамить. ☆не устраивать ссоры в чате и не оскорблять других участников. ☆Пиарить свои чаты/ролевые запрещено. ☆18+ запрещено Ссылка: 🐚 Дод продлится до 10.12 Заходите ,мы ждём вас 💘
👨💻1
Разрыв союза с 𝐡𝐨𝐭 𝐯𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐬 Причина: потому что я так захотела.
Hello dear🐚 Если кого-то из союзников нет в нашем новостном чате напишите в комментарии под данным постом и я отправлю вам ссылку на чат. Напоминаю что я перекидываю лишь те новости, которые есть там С уважения администрация 𝗢𝗰𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝗳𝗮𝗺🐚
Hello dear🐚. Чат 𝗢𝗰𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝗳𝗮𝗺🐚 срочно ищет активных людей . С правилами можно ознакомится тут 🐚 Писать @Miksilen Ваша Хоупи💋
🎄1💋1
Оценка инфо чата:: @Oceanfaminfo •практичность::9/10 Есть Гайд там вся нужная информация •оформление::10/10 Ава шикарная название супер На каждом посте есть обложка Оформление сделано шикарное •продуктивность::9/10 В инфо посты выходят стабильно,а в лайфе только два видео Удачи с продвижением чата #evaluation #админлейла
❤1
—★как вам новое оформление?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
—★Анкеты★— ★Ожп★ ★Омп★
❤2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Oceanfaminfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
—★как вам новое оформление?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2023 to 27 April 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,176,241 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Oceanfaminfo named 15 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗢𝗰𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝗳𝗮𝗺 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗼 🐚 #𝗢𝗳 (закрыт)” (@Oceanfaminfo), 8 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Oceanfaminfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.