Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Observer Effect

Channel

The Observer Effect

@ObserverShift

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

267subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003709888027
TypeChannel
Username@ObserverShift
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 13 April 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ObserverShift

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

264267265.57 August 2026 — 264 subscribers8 August 2026 — 264 subscribers23 August 2026 — 266 subscribers1 October 2026 — 265 subscribers11 October 2026 — 267 subscribers7 August 202611 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 65 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 264–267 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Oct 2026, 11:57267+2
1 Oct 2026, 01:39265-1
23 Aug 2026, 22:47266+2
8 Aug 2026, 09:03264no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:41264first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2438.1%
🔥2031.7%
❤1219.0%
🎉23.17%
🤣23.17%
⚡11.59%
🍾11.59%
👌11.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC63 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Across boardrooms, hospitals, banks and government offices, a quiet madness has taken hold. Leaders claim revolutionary gains while projects fail, chatbots go unused and honest questions become dangerous. Dissenters are sidelined. True believers rise. This is not hype. It is institutional psychosis where no one can safely speak the truth. From the front lines of consulting, one observer has watched every AI initia…

👍4❤1

1 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC115 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Completely random 🌟🎶 I love music, and i'm still one of those who enjoys listening to Radio, on walks, on road trips and in new countries. but - I not a fan of listening to ads or talking. Then you need to figure out which radio station to jump to next. So - I've build an Android App (still figuring out the name) that does it for you. One can add ANY radio station worldwide, whether based on search, or proximity. Or…

🔥4❤2

11 Jul 2026, 05:30 UTC203 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Hey everyone 👋 Haven’t been posting much lately — been getting back on the corporate bicycle after some time away. But I’m back with more content, thoughts, and views, starting with this one. I’ve written before about why HR needs transformation, and this is a direct continuation of that. AI-first never meant human-second, and it was never meant to be a false choice between AI or human. Is AI Really To Blame for L…

🔥4❤1

24 Jun 2026, 00:56 UTC199 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“If I had an hour to solve a problem and my life depended on the solution, I would spend the first 55 minutes determining the proper question to ask, for once I know the proper question, I could solve the problem in less than five minutes.” — Albert Einstein Why “What is the AI ROI?” Is Usually the Wrong Question and How to Ask the Right One Instead https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-what-ai-roi-usually-wrong-quest…

⚡1

15 Jun 2026, 01:19 UTC220 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Thank you!! 😁 https://www.linkedin.com/posts/davidrh_aifailurehandbook-ai-enterpriseai-ugcPost-7472094009704833024-qBX5/

❤1👌1

11 Jun 2026, 04:12 UTC213 viewsread 8 August 2026

The AI Layoff Mirage https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ai-layoff-mirage-dr-david-r-hardoon-umjsc

10 Jun 2026, 13:28 UTC197 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚀 The AI Layoff Mirage: Why Headlines Ignore the Jobs Being Created Tomorrow, I’m publishing a new opinion piece that challenges the dominant narrative around AI and jobs. Headlines are filled with stories of layoffs at Meta, Oracle, Shopee, and other tech giants, with AI being blamed for nearly 40% of recent job cuts. It feels alarming — but this is only half the story. In reality, companies are not destroying jo…

👍5

3 Jun 2026, 00:44 UTC193 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Progressively available :) In case, for whatever reason, you actually end up reading it - hope it makes you laugh. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/davidrh_aifailure-responsibleai-digitaltransformation-share-7466950656164302848-WfJx

🔥3❤1

30 May 2026, 09:01 UTC189 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Happy birthday to all May babies 🎂 and some unsolicited reflections 😁 https://www.linkedin.com/posts/davidrh_tomorrow-is-my-birthday-and-im-spending-activity-7466412191164911616-5jqY?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&rcm=ACoAAAC11PUB6bXVB2Khjqo0ABlxtMcjJuzhmtw

❤3🎉2👍1

29 May 2026, 05:36 UTC175 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Don't use AI just for the sake of using AI

👍1🤣1

16 May 2026, 10:34 UTC228 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔥 The Making of a CDO and CAIO Over the past few years, many professionals have asked me: What does it really take to become a Chief Data Officer (CDO) or Chief AI Officer (CAIO)? There’s no simple linear path. Both roles are shaped by context, delivery, and credibility. Here’s my perspective: The CDO Role The CDO has evolved from a visionary data leader into a regulator-mandated guardian of data quality, governan…

👍4

5 May 2026, 07:33 UTC237 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥4❤1🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ObserverShift. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Observer Effect” (@ObserverShift), 267 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ObserverShift.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.