Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 深圳商务KTV 小时场摸摸唱 比基尼场

Channel

深圳商务KTV 小时场摸摸唱 比基尼场

@O_1h3lOqdlxiOGQ1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

792subscribers

+311 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003948522577
TypeChannel
Username@O_1h3lOqdlxiOGQ1
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 7 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/O_1h3lOqdlxiOGQ1

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

481792636.515 August 2026 — 481 subscribers16 August 2026 — 484 subscribers24 August 2026 — 558 subscribers30 August 2026 — 620 subscribers9 September 2026 — 734 subscribers17 September 2026 — 792 subscribers15 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net +311. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 434–839 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 07:19792+58
9 Sept 2026, 15:02734+114
30 Aug 2026, 23:47620+62
24 Aug 2026, 04:04558+74
16 Aug 2026, 15:09484+3
15 Aug 2026, 17:30481first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 13s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤981.8%
👍218.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC606 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

好多大哥在问我一个商务KTV的问题,到底是商务片场(通台)划算还是点场(300/400/小时)划算?我觉得如果时间玩的长、不是星期四、五、六(那个场子不缺女孩子),然后喝酒还厉害酒水消费多,商务应酬要排面。还是选择商务片场。如果反之,个人消费或者和朋友A A、人多(自己买自己的女孩子单)、要性价比、实惠。那就毫不犹豫选择点场,300/小时的女孩子质量相当于深圳商务片场1200-1500之间的质量,400/小时相当于1600-2000左右的商务片场标准。500/小时估计明年就会有了,那个出来高端商务片场直接崩盘,现在就这一块还可以顶住,再这样下去小时场500/小时指日可待!

❤3

20 Jul 2026, 10:07 UTC≈1,210 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

今天跟老板探讨一下,去KTV消费到底选择片场(一台到底)还是小时场(按小时计费)?如果是高规格商务接待或者需要谈出台,当然要选择高档次片场,跟女孩子自己谈吃早餐的概率50-70左右。价格6-8-10k不等,包房消费到6-8k左右,一般没有都喝洋酒。女孩子2500-3000一个。老板会说我可以玩便宜的的片场啊,1600以下的片场本人不建议,女孩子又老又丑,运气爆棚可以遇到1-2个可以点的,我那天带大哥去龙华点1200的片场,来了80个女孩子没有看到一个可以跟小时场300比的。这就是为什么我推荐南山高端片场、福田小时场的原因。如果自己请要好的朋友、或者普通商务接待接待,一定要选择小时场,16以下的片场很多女孩子素质不高,上班第一个小时对老板非常到位,第二个小时开始玩手机、发信息(因为想下班了,反正钱已经到手了),而小时场女孩子如果这样那就给一个班要求换香槟了。这个就是小时场为什么一定要时时刻刻都有好的服务原因,老板如果玩两个小时,休…

❤1

16 Jul 2026, 11:05 UTC≈1,270 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

今天聊一聊商务KTV和其它娱乐对比,首先是酒吧,酒吧适合自己带女生去玩,里面酒托太多或者小蜜蜂会倒掉你的洋酒(散台除外)。到达提高消费的目的。是啥也没有干几k就没有了。第二和私影PK,私影一般装修环境差或者包房小,妹子比小时场300/400的贵、不喝酒的状态很难玩到位。第三和台球宝贝PK,台球宝贝便宜一点,100多到200多一个小时,就是在包房打也放不开呀。这个虽然总消费1k左右,性价比不高。还不如按摩。第四和按摩到家PK,主要是年纪大,情绪价值到不了位,92也可以释放一下,但年轻人一般不选择。其实商务KTV除了消费贵一点,其它还真找不到什么毛病。有兄弟说不可以打炮啊,现在是没有价格的,自己玩多了私聊都懂的,成本高而已。✈️上不是很多价格不高的哈,但这个是结局,我们还是要找到快乐的过程呀,所以我经常约一个女孩子唱k,都几个月了,反正就是找感觉。昨天终于拿下了,今天开始没有感觉了。又要重新寻找目标。

❤3

8 Jul 2026, 08:08 UTC≈1,450 views0 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

老板,其实真的不要纠结400/300消费,肯定400/小时要比300/小时的女孩子质量、场子装修、配服务员(卫生)、氛围感、音响等要高两个档次的。但还是按自己消费预算去300/400的,这样不会出现消费超支哈!我认识几个老板,每次都是要去400,玩5-6个小时,点女孩子玩差不多3个班1200,也是很开心。这样间断性点也是可以的哈。预算下来也不贵。请客还是要点档次的,星期天到星期三有的400场子24:00后会优惠哈

6 Jul 2026, 11:02 UTC≈1,490 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

今天分享一个玩KTV或者地陪各种陪侍型行业的经验,老板有时候在任何环境下我们要保持冷静,当那个女孩子让你插或者可以交易的时候,记得先转200-500的米,最好标注娱乐资金哈,然后该干嘛就干嘛,这个动作很重要‼️不然在隐蔽的地方没有第三者口供,你有理说不清哈。做这个动作代表最多是嫖chang,不是猥亵或者强模坚,很多老板、大哥在那个时间忘记了或者猴急,有可能出大问题的。

❤1

26 Jun 2026, 10:57 UTC≈1,690 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

单刷的老板看过来哈,我们为什么选择单刷?是因为单刷我一个人就是王,没有人干扰。想干啥都可以。第二要把消费性价比,不用搞大费用,那就一定要选择我的单刷消费套餐,所以要选300场子性价比套餐,1、1900全包,酒水、开台、果盘、小食、纸巾、包房费(包房不限时间到早上6:00)女孩子3个半小时。2、2200全包5个小时。以上对位。老板这样不用担心其它费用产生还玩的开心!我到时间会提醒,女孩子也是海选不满意到钟就可以换。管家式服务更简单,更性价比消费。(唱个量贩式一个人5个小时都要1千多哈,还没有妹子陪摸)

20 Jun 2026, 13:40 UTC≈1,810 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

老板们,千万不要轻易相信要订房押金188、288的中介、骗子。都是那这个为幌子骗钱。其实深圳小时场酒水包房低消小房都是780-1080-1380-1680最多了,不会几k。女孩子400/小时还没有300/小时玩的嗨,格局大。只是长相身材要好一些!这些都要看看女孩子上班是不是微醺状态!所以在海选的时候首先看看是不是微醺,然后才是身材长相。不知道老板有没有不同建议哈,下面打出来探讨一下怎么出击!

❤1

14 Jun 2026, 15:40 UTC≈1,710 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

老板,星期天到星期四24:00后中高档次新洲在线有限量打折房哈,如果要高性价比是最好的选择,女孩子都微醺了,从24:00玩到早上7:00完全够了,房费、酒钱都减半!装修中高档次,女孩子高档次300-400/70分钟。

11 Jun 2026, 11:01 UTC≈1,790 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

昨天晚上我点了上次点过的女孩子,上次玩的那种状态记忆犹新,非常开,所以我一直等她下班。但这次过来完全没有兴趣了,不知道是没有了新鲜感还是因为没有喝酒到位玩不开?不知道老板们有没有这种感觉?我感觉还是不要点同一个,该换就换

👍2

8 Jun 2026, 09:04 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «深圳商务KTV 小时场摸摸唱 比基尼场»

6 Jun 2026, 16:40 UTC≈1,660 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

老板,每次你过来说一定要玩的开的,要好玩的,要漂亮的,要胸大的,还要风骚型的。其实我都找给你了。只是你一直无动于衷,在旁边的我都急死了。妹子主动不主动一定是自己带的,所以我一会出去给空间,但回来一看还是那样。来了这里该玩的一定要出击,不要指望妹子自己打开奶子贴着你的嘴。多玩几次绝对会成功,不要和妹子谈什么洗脑?她天天都在听,节约时间赶紧摸摸、玩玩、然后中场休息10-15分钟挑下一个玩

30 May 2026, 16:51 UTC≈1,670 views0 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

条一个妹子除了身材、长相、籍贯以外,一定要看看她的状态,很生气或者抱怨多、负能量多都立马要退掉,就算时间超过10几分钟给100也坚决不要。不要勉强自己。来商务KTV就是享受情绪价值的地方。不退会把整个房间气氛带下去哈,相信我老板

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @O_1h3lOqdlxiOGQ1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“深圳商务KTV 小时场摸摸唱 比基尼场” (@O_1h3lOqdlxiOGQ1), 792 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/O_1h3lOqdlxiOGQ1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.