22 measurements spanning 22 days, net -472. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,932–22,546 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 23:48
22,003
-18
29 Aug 2026, 00:44
22,021
-19
28 Aug 2026, 01:43
22,040
-26
26 Aug 2026, 23:08
22,066
-7
26 Aug 2026, 01:16
22,073
-25
24 Aug 2026, 23:39
22,098
-36
23 Aug 2026, 11:16
22,134
-15
22 Aug 2026, 00:15
22,149
-38
20 Aug 2026, 16:56
22,187
-21
19 Aug 2026, 20:04
22,208
-20
18 Aug 2026, 22:15
22,228
-9
17 Aug 2026, 23:41
22,237
-35
16 Aug 2026, 20:08
22,272
-38
15 Aug 2026, 11:18
22,310
-28
14 Aug 2026, 02:14
22,338
-30
12 Aug 2026, 20:53
22,368
-16
11 Aug 2026, 18:53
22,384
-10
10 Aug 2026, 20:55
22,394
-21
9 Aug 2026, 22:31
22,415
-30
8 Aug 2026, 21:52
22,445
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
678 reactions across 19 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
249
36.7%
❤
158
23.3%
custom 5454313693724559322
58
8.55%
🔥
50
7.37%
custom 5289722755871162900
26
3.83%
custom 5289650686319929628
23
3.39%
👎
18
2.65%
🤯
16
2.36%
🫡
15
2.21%
👏
10
1.47%
👌
6
0.885%
👾
6
0.885%
🥰
6
0.885%
🏆
5
0.737%
👨💻
5
0.737%
🤩
5
0.737%
🗿
4
0.59%
❤🔥
3
0.442%
🐳
3
0.442%
👀
3
0.442%
6 further kinds
9
1.33%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 678reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2024 to 25 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @OZ_ITPQ. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2024 to 25 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Новый сервис защищённого соединения для безопасной работы и повседневного использования в сети
Мы запустили сервис, который помогает сохранить ваши данные, приватность и спокойствие — независимо от того, работаете вы удалённо или просто выходите в интернет каждый день.
✔️ Технология обеспечивает
• Шифрование интернет-трафика — защита личных и рабочих данных от перехвата
• Безопасность в общественных сетях Wi-Fi (ка…
🧘♂️ Генерируйте видео через современные нейросети
OZ AI Video - ИИ Генератор видео на Veo 3.1 и Kling AI
Создавайте видео из текста и оживляйте ваши фото
• Veo 3.1 Fast - Создавайте ролики с сюжетам
• Veo 3.1 Quality - Самая современная модель генерации
• Kling AI - Оживляйте ваши фотографии
👉 @ozvideobot
Как разговаривать с нейросетью ?
Модели нейросетей понимают нас абсолютно буквально и для достижения наилучшего результата от них, нужно придерживаться паре простых правил
Основа построения запроса в ИИ
1️⃣ Указание роли
Объяснение задачи модели, например:
«Ты профессиональный программист, который берет на себя роль создания продукта»
2️⃣ Описание текущего обстоятельства
Точное и буквально определения текущих усло…
Нейросетка Telegram ботов от OZ
Доброго времени суток, уважаемые подписчики сообщества OZ, мы рады представить вам каталог наших новых продуктов на основе ИИ. В них входят 3 новых бота:
• Генератор фото 👉 @ozimgbot
• Редактор фото 👉 @ozphotoshopbot
• Психолог 👉 @ozpsyhologybot
Используя наши продукты, вы сможете решать большое количество задач.
Например, с помощью @avaisebot запрограммировать Telegram бота, создать …
Искусственный Интеллект OZ
C которым вы сможете
✍️ Переписываться текстом
🎙Общаться голосовыми сообщениями
🫠 Показать на видеокружок задачу в Real-Time
✨ Получить ответ на задачу по фотографии
✈️ Использовать новый режим размышлений
🎶 А также — наслаждаться музыкальной нейроподборкой в YouTube
Бот по ссылке 👉 @avaisebot
Почему ChatGPT это не ИИ? Или как нейросеть материализует мысль 👉 Прочесть статью
OpenSource про…
🫡 DISCORD - Все
Мессенджер прикрыли вслед за youtube ввиду «нарушения требований законодательства».
Ниже представлены несколько способов вернуть доступ
Используя AmneziaVPN
Файл с установщиком → ссылка
───────
Старый добрый GoodbyeDPI
• Скачиваем GoodbyeDPI
• Открываем russia-blacklist.txt
• Добавляем в список доменов всё, что в списке ниже:
discord-attachments-uploads-prd.storage.googleapis.com
dis.gd
discord.co
d…
🧘♂️ Что дальше будет с Telegram
Вновь твориться история и дальнейшая судьба нашего любимого мессенджера не ясна, многие говорят о том что конфиденциальности пользователей ничего не угрожает, мы считаем это не так, существуют огромные риски что Дуров передаст ключи серверного шифрования ввиду того что ему грозит 20 лет тюрьмы, в Telegram существуют 2 вида шифрования, для секретных чатов используется (end-to-end) шифр…
🧘♂️ Для всех кто хочет войти в IT
Мы разработали уникальную методологию, основанную на личном опыте, которая поможет вам освоить навыки программирования с нуля и выйти на доход в первые месяцы. Всё, что нужно – это желание самостоятельно учиться и упорно трудиться. Вы сможете прокачать навыки, получить реальный опыт, собрать портфолио и начать зарабатывать в IT, даже если у вас нет специального образования.
👉 Открыт…
📹 11 способов оживить Youtube
Убиваем тормоза — на Windows, macOS и ТВ, на телефонах и даже самих роутерах! Сохраняем, пробуем и боремся за свои видосики
Способы Windows
• ЮБуст – расширение для браузера, ускоряющее Ютуб в пару кликов
• GoodbyeDPI — уничтожит тормоза на уровне DPI-пакетов
• Протокол QUIC — простой способ оживить Ютуб во всех браузерах
• Piped.video — копия Ютуба, с доступом к тем же роликам
• MeTube…
🧘♂️ Чиним Youtube на Linux и macOS
Способ работает в Safari, Chrome и Яндекс Браузере — он тоже связан с DPI.
1. Открываем приложение «Терминал» и вставляем это:
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xvzc/SpoofDPI/main/install.sh | bash -s darwin-amd64
2. Затем вставляем это:
export PATH=$PATH:~/.spoof-dpi/bin
3. Потом это:
spoof-dpi
4. Проверяем скорость в максимальном разрешении!
Если не сработало, то з…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OZ_ITPQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2024 to 25 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OZ” (@OZ_ITPQ), 22,003 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OZ_ITPQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.