Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OUTCOMMS

Channel

OUTCOMMS

@OUTCOMMS_TEAM

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

235subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002520202165
TypeChannel
Username@OUTCOMMS_TEAM
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OUTCOMMS_TEAM

Growth

2332352347 August 2026 — 233 subscribers8 August 2026 — 233 subscribers14 August 2026 — 234 subscribers23 August 2026 — 235 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 233–235 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 06:26235+1
14 Aug 2026, 17:17234+1
8 Aug 2026, 10:04233no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:59233first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 30 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

54 reactions across 4 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54746485170351919331222.2%
custom 51882597197807878101120.4%
custom 5271565068662769611713.0%
custom 5429120369048987608713.0%
custom 5435857175576616302713.0%
custom 542916016621594613459.26%
custom 521331872364917130123.70%
custom 543815054208379063623.70%
custom 547441718580166261411.85%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 14 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Apr 2026, 06:34 UTC626 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔆 Руководители не всегда могут обсудить свои рабочие задачи с кем-то, кто реально понимает контекст. Подчинённым нельзя сказать всё, другие коллеги сами в такой же ситуации. Именно поэтому в «Руковожу по-своему» мы регулярно проводим мастермайнды. Это встречи, где участники разбирают реальные рабочие запросы друг друга. Слово сложное, а вот формат простой, собрали несколько правил, которые мы соблюдаем. Забирайте и

custom 51882597197807878103custom 54746485170351919333custom 52133187236491713012custom 54744171858016626141

9 Apr 2026, 11:44 UTC171 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Внутренние сообщества в компаниях рождаются двумя путями. Первый — стихийно: люди с общим интересом или болью сами находят друг друга, начинают общаться, и в какой-то момент это превращается во что-то живое. Второй — инициатива бизнеса: компания решает, что комьюнити нужно, и начинает его строить сверху вниз. Оба пути рабочие. Но в обоих случаях рано или поздно встаёт один и тот же вопрос — с кем именно это всё стр

custom 54291203690489876086custom 54291601662159461344custom 54358571755766163024

8 Apr 2026, 07:13 UTC146 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не успели моргнуть глазом как уже апрель и в Кружке внутрикомов наступила тема комьюнити — зачем они нужны и как их строить 🥰 Мы всем сердцем верим в силу сообществ — из этой убеждённости, собственно, и появился сам Кружок в 2025-м. Поэтому этот месяц нам особенно близок. Первую встречу уже провели, обсудили, зачем компаниям вообще нужны комьюнити и как это обосновать перед бизнесом. Впереди ещё три: 🤣 11 апреля,

custom 54358571755766163022custom 54381505420837906362custom 54291601662159461341

30 Jan 2026, 10:08 UTC310 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Делегирую. Контролирую. Переделываю. Классический управленческий треугольник боли. На этой неделе выступали в клубе руководителей IBS и параллельно обсуждали стили управления с участниками нашего комьюнити «Руковожу по-своему». Управленческие привычки, с которыми руководители живут годами, не зависят от размера бизнеса. Треугольник боли работает везде. В карточках мы разложили: ⚪️какие стили управления бывают ⚪️чт

custom 54746485170351919339custom 51882597197807878108custom 52715650686627696117custom 54291203690489876081custom 54358571755766163021

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @OUTCOMMS_TEAM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OUTCOMMS” (@OUTCOMMS_TEAM), 235 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OUTCOMMS_TEAM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.