Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ONESTORE | FEEDBACK

@ONE1_STORE_FEEDBACK

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002482671595
TypeChannel
Username@ONE1_STORE_FEEDBACK
DescriptionОтзывы📌📝
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ONE1_STORE_FEEDBACK

Growth

78 August 2026 — 7 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7 subscribers8 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6–8 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:157no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:057first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 21 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
35
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

24 Mar 2026, 09:42 UTC36 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

заказ доехал, без нареканий, спасибо за отличный сервис

15 Feb 2026, 17:36 UTC56 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Кроссовки очень хорошие, качественные и красивые пришли в хорошем состоянии, боялась что деньги просто забрали но зря волновалась все обошлось и кроссовки к меня 👍

3 Feb 2026, 18:04 UTC77 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

спасибо большое,кросы приехали быстро в сроки.Буду еще брать

3 Feb 2026, 13:19 UTC70 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Все отлично, уже походил в них

11 Jan 2026, 15:53 UTC89 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @blackwhiteimagesPhoto

Можно доверять. ✈️ ONESTORE | POIZON, 95 (https://t.me/poizon_95) На рынке больше года. Быстрый выкуп и оперативная доставка со всех популярных китайских маркетплейсов. ОТЗЫВЫ #белыйсписок #база выставить свою одежду на продажу.

1 Dec 2025, 15:28 UTC117 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Привет Спасибо большое! Все пришло, все во время, качество супер! Закажу в ближайшее время еще!

26 Nov 2025, 14:34 UTC119 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

здравствуйте, забрал товар, все быстро приехало. буду еще заказывать

24 Nov 2025, 17:14 UTC107 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @remove_scammingPhoto

🕊 БЕЛЫЙ СПИСОК / МОЖНО ДОВЕРЯТЬ ✅ ONESTORE | POIZON, 95 👈 На рынке больше года 💥 Быстрый выкуп и оперативная доставка со всех популярных китайских маркетплейсов. 💫 Сделаем всё в лучшем виде! ————————— #Советуем_к_покупкам #БС

23 Jun 2025, 12:08 UTC188 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

все топчик!! пришло быстрее заявленного времени, рекомендую🫀

16 Jun 2025, 19:30 UTC179 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Все качественно и быстро, рекомендую!

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ONE1_STORE_FEEDBACK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 795,629 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ONESTORE | FEEDBACK” (@ONE1_STORE_FEEDBACK), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ONE1_STORE_FEEDBACK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.