$PUMP touched almost $0.003 after my call here congrats if you followed me ($0.005 soon )
🔥27😁25❤24🎉19👍14

Channel
@OLYMPUSCCALLS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,258subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002270290702 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OLYMPUSCCALLS |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OLYMPUSCCALLS |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 10,258 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 10,262 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 10,257 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:21 | 10,254 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:50 | 10,255 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 10,258 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 10,263 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 10,264 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (17 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 172,920 |
| Reactions total | 4,228 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4,228 reactions across 36 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 870 | 20.6% | |
| ❤ | 861 | 20.4% | |
| 👍 | 850 | 20.1% | |
| 🔥 | 845 | 20.0% | |
| 🎉 | 802 | 19.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,228reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$PUMP touched almost $0.003 after my call here congrats if you followed me ($0.005 soon )
🔥27😁25❤24🎉19👍14
这是十个月来首次看到这么多高频博彩玩家重返赌场。 这是一个看涨的信号。
❤32🔥29😁28👍22🎉19
自2010年比特币标志确立为如今的样式以来,比特币便与“橙色”($ORANGE)结下了不解之缘。这种“橙色”的关联一直延续至今——例如,Michael Saylor 经常发布橙色相关内容(如橙色圆点、“橙色三月”活动等)。 关于 $ORANGE 的渊源最早可追溯至2010年:https://x.com/orange_coin_sol/status/2087088867518095410?s=46 既然像 $USELESS 这样的代币都能迎来爆发,$ORANGE 凭什么不行?它拥有扎实的 Meme 基础和叙事内核,无论是加密圈资深人士(“Trenchers”)、比特币支持者还是普通大众,都能轻松产生共鸣并参与其中。 合约地址 (CA): C6ASDsxzqBvF5bCQFVAGMRWwfgZNhfozbb9DkgiKpump 社区 X 链接: https://x.com/i/communities/200074333303…
🎉28🔥28😁26👍25❤22
Sticker, posted without a caption
👍14❤11🔥10🎉9😁9
$PUMP 经历了长达 7 个月的震荡盘整,却在短短一个月内收复失地 这就是坚定信念的体现 继续冲高
🔥44❤41👍39😁37🎉29
$MAX officially donated 444.444 bnb https://x.com/gigglemascotbnb/status/2086971680790925415
👍29😁27🎉21❤14🔥13
$TOAD 33.5K to 20M
❤29🔥23😁23🎉22👍12
This is your sign to lock in before the year runs out. 🚀🔥 The private insider is staying active, spotting opportunities early and stacking wins consistently. 💸🏆 Don’t fade the movement—stay locked in for what’s next. 📈🔥
❤18🎉16🔥16👍13😁8
“Hype”(炒作)驱动着永续合约/衍生品板块,而“Pump”(拉盘/造富效应)则引领着赌场类项目/Launchpad(代币首发平台)板块。 两者在过去30天的营收表现旗鼓相当,甚至在7天数据及手续费收入方面,“Pump”类项目还占据明显优势;然而,前者的市值(MC)却是后者的15倍。 这正是熊市中那种极具吸引力的“非对称博弈”机会。 剧烈的估值重塑势在必行。 等着看吧,那些还在场外观望的家伙,接下来几个月会如何争先恐后地FOMO(生怕错过),抢着接下你手中的筹码。 兄弟们,赶紧布局吧。
❤15👍15😁10🎉8🔥7
$TENDIES 的高时间周期(HTF)走势看起来蓄势待发,冲击历史新高(ATH)前的最后警示 0x45242320DBB855EeA8Fd36804C6487E10E97FCF9
🔥13😁12🎉11❤10👍9
Shill me your hidden alpha plays DM @cishanjias ☎️
❤16🔥10😁10🎉9👍9
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤13🎉12🔥11👍10😁9
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @OLYMPUSCCALLS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cishajias/ 慈善家/Philanthropist ✨慈善家 🐼🇨🇳 ” (@OLYMPUSCCALLS), 10,258 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OLYMPUSCCALLS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.