Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for πŽπ‘π† ππŽπ‘π€ πŸ€πŸ’β„’οΈ

Channel

πŽπ‘π† ππŽπ‘π€ πŸ€πŸ’β„’οΈ

@OGR_NORA01

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

43,551subscribers

+68 since we began measuring on 16 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001813578553
TypeChannel
Username@OGR_NORA01
Description______𝐎𝐧π₯𝐲 𝐆𝐨𝐝 𝐈𝐬 π“π‘πž 𝐊𝐒𝐧𝐠 π‚ƒβ˜Ύ
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/OGR_NORA01

Growth

43,48343,55143,51716 September 2026 β€” 43,483 subscribers18 September 2026 β€” 43,551 subscribers16 September 202618 September 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days, net +68. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,473–43,561 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 04:3843,551+68
16 Sept 2026, 13:2243,483first reading

Engagement

61 posts held, back to 15 September 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
1.55%
avg views Γ· 43,551 subscribers
Avg views / post
676
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.88%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
61
of 61 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 57 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held61 (15 September 2026 – 19 September 2026)
Views total38,515
Reactions total686
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Sept 2026, 08:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
51
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

686 reactions across 31 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀37454.5%
πŸ‘8712.7%
🫑213.06%
🀩182.62%
πŸŽ‰172.48%
πŸ”₯162.33%
🍾152.19%
🍌131.90%
πŸ†111.60%
πŸ’‹111.60%
πŸ’―111.60%
πŸ¦„91.31%
πŸ™81.17%
πŸ†’71.02%
πŸ“60.875%
πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»60.875%
πŸ’Š60.875%
πŸ‘50.729%
πŸ‘€40.583%
πŸ’…40.583%
16 further kinds375.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 686 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 57 we hold a reading for Β· 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β€” bought with money β€” on a post by @OGR_NORA01. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 61 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 September 2026 to 19 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Sept 2026, 08:40 UTC63 viewsread 19 September 2026

Posted without readable text

Signed πŽπ‘π† ππŽπ‘π€ πŸ€πŸ’β„’οΈ

18 Sept 2026, 23:03 UTC772 views35 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

🟑🟑🟑🟑 🟑🟑🟑🟑🟑🟑🟑 ➑️ Stay Active ⬅️ πŸŽŠπŸ”΄ Hot Odds Coming Soon πŸ”œ React ❀️πŸ”₯πŸ”₯

πŸ‘22❀5πŸ†2πŸ’‹2🫑2⚑1🀩1

Signed πŽπ‘π† ππŽπ‘π€ πŸ€πŸ’β„’οΈ

18 Sept 2026, 20:52 UTCviews β€”

πŽπ‘π† ππŽπ‘π€ πŸ€πŸ’β„’οΈ pinned a photo

18 Sept 2026, 20:52 UTC902 views10 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

πŸ’Ž VICTORY SPEAKS FOR ITSELF πŸ’Ž Another successful day. Another satisfied community. πŸ† We let the results do the talking. Congratulations to everyone who secured today’s win! πŸ₯‚πŸŽ‰ Thank you for your continued trust and support. Tomorrow brings another opportunity. ══════════════════ πŸ‘©β€πŸ’ΌADMIN: @ORG_NORA01

❀6πŸ’‹1πŸ”₯1🀩1🫑1

Signed πŽπ‘π† ππŽπ‘π€ πŸ€πŸ’β„’οΈ

18 Sept 2026, 20:28 UTC842 views8 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

πŸ’΅πŸ’΅3/3 Open vip BOOM Expectedβœ¨βœ”οΈ βœ”οΈDone & Dusted βœ”οΈ Bookies Must Go Down πŸ“Œ

❀4πŸŽ‰1πŸ†1πŸ‘1🫑1

Signed πŽπ‘π† ππŽπ‘π€ πŸ€πŸ’β„’οΈ

18 Sept 2026, 20:14 UTC104 viewsread 18 September 2026

Get Fixed 70+ Odds Daily By Joining this Channel. For views share @share0877 https://t.me/drawbettip12/16254 NB: ⚜️I ONLY NEED STUDENTS FOR PAYAFTERπŸ’―βœ…βšœοΈ https://t.me/drawbettip12/16254 If you not a student don't join

18 Sept 2026, 19:45 UTC869 views19 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

πŸ’™πŸ©΅GOD DID πŸ©΅πŸ’™ πŸ‘‘Not Done Yet, We Just Begin ✌️ πŸ’₯πŸ₯‚Unmute & Drop EmojisπŸ₯‚πŸ’₯

πŸ‘8❀2🍾2πŸŽ‰1πŸ†1πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»1🀩1πŸ¦„1

Signed πŽπ‘π† ππŽπ‘π€ πŸ€πŸ’β„’οΈ

Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @OGR_NORA01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπŽπ‘π† ππŽπ‘π€ πŸ€πŸ’β„’οΈβ€ (@OGR_NORA01), 43,551 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OGR_NORA01.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.