Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝑬𝑳 𝑭𝑨𝑹𝑼𝑸 🍬

Channel

𝑬𝑳 𝑭𝑨𝑹𝑼𝑸 🍬

@ELFARUQ3

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

61,033subscribers

+18 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001670488529
TypeChannel
Username@ELFARUQ3
Description⚫️ π™Ύπ™½π™»πšˆ 𝙢𝙾𝙳 π™Έπš‚ πšƒπ™·π™΄ 𝙺𝙸𝙽𝙢 πŸ™‡β€β™‚οΈπŸ€@El_Faruq2
Created9 January 2023 β€” measured β€” dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ELFARUQ3

Growth

61,01561,03361,02414 Aug 2026, 12:49 β€” 61,015 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 16:48 β€” 61,033 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 12:4915 Aug 2026, 16:48
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61,012–61,036 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:4861,033+18
14 Aug 2026, 12:4961,015first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 9 January 2023 β€” the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
2.72%
avg views Γ· 61,033 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,660
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.56%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 31 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held40 (9 January 2023 – 16 August 2026)
Views total51,516
Reactions total786
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 02:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
18

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2,264 reactions across 22 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀1,67974.2%
πŸ“703.09%
πŸ‘683.00%
πŸ”₯652.87%
πŸ‘612.69%
πŸ’‹482.12%
πŸ†’361.59%
πŸ˜‡341.50%
πŸ‘€331.46%
🐳311.37%
😍210.928%
πŸ™190.839%
πŸ’―150.663%
πŸ™Š120.53%
πŸ₯°100.442%
πŸ‘Œ60.265%
πŸ’˜60.265%
🫑60.265%
🍌50.221%
πŸ†50.221%
13 further kinds341.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 2,264reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2023 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 02:04 UTCviews β€”

𝑬𝑳 𝑭𝑨𝑹𝑼𝑸 🍬 pinned a photo

16 Aug 2026, 01:08 UTC142 viewsread 16 August 2026

MAXIMUM REACTIONS GUYS ❀️‍πŸ”₯πŸ”₯❀️

15 Aug 2026, 23:12 UTC435 views32 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

STAKE AS GIVEN πŸ₯°πŸ¦… I STAKED VERY HIGH β€οΈπŸ¦… WE PRAY FOR A BOOM πŸ™πŸ¦…

❀30πŸ”₯1πŸ™1

15 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTCβ‰ˆ1,000 views22 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

ONE CUT AGAIN πŸ’”πŸ˜‚πŸ€§

❀14πŸŽ…2πŸ”₯2πŸ•Š2πŸ’―1πŸ€“1

15 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC21 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Let’s go β€οΈπŸ‘†πŸ’―

❀1

Signed πš‚πš‘πšŠπš›πšŽπšœ π™·πš˜πš–πšŽπšœ

15 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC31 viewsread 15 August 2026

https://t.me/real_Sandra00/343932

Signed πš‚πš‘πšŠπš›πšŽπšœ π™·πš˜πš–πšŽπšœ

15 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC39 viewsread 15 August 2026

100+odd for free β€οΈπŸ‘†

Signed πš‚πš‘πšŠπš›πšŽπšœ π™·πš˜πš–πšŽπšœ

15 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC54 viewsread 15 August 2026

https://t.me/MEHAKTHK/579425

Signed πš‚πš‘πšŠπš›πšŽπšœ π™·πš˜πš–πšŽπšœ

15 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC56 viewsread 15 August 2026

Correct Scores πŸ‘†β£οΈFree Tips

Signed πš‚πš‘πšŠπš›πšŽπšœ π™·πš˜πš–πšŽπšœ

15 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC84 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

πŸ™STAKE AS GIVING βœ…βœ…βœ… Play and win 🀩🀩 ❗️Always Check Time https://t.me/+HXObIJL2ECE0Y2E0

Signed πš‚πš‘πšŠπš›πšŽπšœ π™·πš˜πš–πšŽπšœ

15 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC115 viewsread 15 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed πš‚πš‘πšŠπš›πšŽπšœ π™·πš˜πš–πšŽπšœ

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @ELFARUQ3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 756,387 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ‘¬π‘³ 𝑭𝑨𝑹𝑼𝑸 πŸ¬β€ (@ELFARUQ3), 61,033 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ELFARUQ3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.