Channel
@OFCPADJA
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
1,606subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003883855220 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OFCPADJA |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OFCPADJA |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 1,606 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 1,602 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 1,601 | -14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 1,615 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 1,614 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (24 July 2026 โ 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,137 |
| Reactions total | 37 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
37 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โคโ๐ฅ | 37 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
bahkan masalah yang sudah selesai dan berlalu masih saja diungkit sampai detik ini. orang yang kalian cari pun sudah tidak ada lagi di sekitar kami, tapi yang terus dijadikan sasaran justru padja. satu orang yang berbuat salah, tapi dengan mudahnya kalian melampiaskan semuanya ke pihak yang sejak awal sudah mengambil tindakan dan memberikan konsekuensi yang seadil mungkin. kalau memang sebelumnya kalian punya persoalโฆ
โคโ๐ฅ15
Kalian nih pengangguran kah? Kok bisa ya ada tenaga buat ngurusin orang lain, padahal masalah udah clear dari lama, tapi masih aja di ungkit. Kenapa sih? Caper banget di liat liat, pengen banget di notice atau gimana?
โคโ๐ฅ5
lonte teriak lonte๐
โคโ๐ฅ3
kalau kalian memang punya masalah sama orangnya, ya selesaikan sama orangnya. tidak perlu setiap ada kesempatan nama padja ikut diseret. orang yang kalian bahas juga sudah dikeluarkan dari padja, jadi saya kurang paham kenapa yang terus disalahkan malah instansinya. jangan sampai karena benci sama satu orang, akhirnya semua yang pernah berkaitan sama dia ikut dijadikan sasaran. yang bikin heran, faktanya dari awal pโฆ
โคโ๐ฅ11
Sticker, posted without a caption
jangan nyampah di board,kalo mau mah langsung rc ownernya aja
walawe, iya nih bubarin donk nder, bingung ah harus gimana bubarinnya juga
waduu ngeri ah, sipaling ga bermasalah๐ kaca mau kaca? hey, permasalahan pribadi hingga rasa benci kalian ke anggota maupun ex anggota kami itu bukan tampungan kami, makanya main rp tuh sewajarnya rp aja nanti giliran posisi kalian yang berada diposisi ini malah memutar balikan fakta. jangan terlalu di anon-anonim kan sini rc/bot aja, padja dari awal sangat amat terbuka menerima kritsar
โคโ๐ฅ3
izin menambahkan sedikit,yang bermasalah di kerajaan kita juga sudah selesai dari pihak kita jadi sudah tidak ada sangkut pautnya dengan kita,dan dri pihak kitanya juga tidak membenarkan adanya incest,jadi tolong perbanyak literasi ya untuk kedepannya agar tidak di ungkit" lagi
saya disini sangat amat membuka lebar lebar roomchat saya bagi siapapun yang ingin mendiskusikan tentang hal ini, silahkan hubungi @libifdo jika ada yang perlu di bahas lagi.
hai nder, apakah faktor umur mempengaruhi indra penglihatanmu? jelas jelas disini ( https://t.me/OFCPADJA/2355) udah tertera loh ya klarifikasinya, sudah di jelaskan juga rincian masalahnya apa, saya juga sudah menyiapkan tempat khusus untuk anda memberikan informasi lebih lanjut ( https://t.me/spilldja/77 ), dan kami juga sudah membalas semua yang disampaikan melalui bot, saya tidak tau siapa yang datang menghampiriโฆ
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @OFCPADJA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 688,956 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 18 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ฒ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ _ @PADJAOFCโ (@OFCPADJA), 1,606 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OFCPADJA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.