Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ÖFÇ MỖṂMΛΣ.

@OFCMOMMAE

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

5,010subscribers

+949 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003123541247
TypeChannel
Username@OFCMOMMAE
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OFCMOMMAE

Growth

4,0605,0104,5356 August 2026 — 4,061 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,061 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,060 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,463 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,010 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +949. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,918–5,153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:195,010+547
9 Aug 2026, 20:314,463+403
6 Aug 2026, 15:414,060-1
6 Aug 2026, 09:164,061no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:064,061first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.79%
avg views ÷ 5,010 subscribers
Avg views / post
89.8
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held27 (25 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total898
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

95 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥2324.2%
💋2324.2%
1818.9%
🔥1818.9%
😍55.26%
😘44.21%
🥰44.21%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 23:48 UTC27 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ayooo ayoo joinn op membnyaa mommaee, kapan lagi nihh mommaee opmemb yekan

6 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC74 viewsread 8 August 2026

RM: Itu link baru nder, kalo expired brrti lu sebelumnya pernah ke kick dri base. Coba konfirmasi ke bot ofc, ntar dibantuin kalo emng niat yee

6 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC73 viewsread 8 August 2026

RM: Leh kok, join ajaaa, santaii kita mahh asal lu ga berulah aja😜😜

6 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC73 viewsread 8 August 2026

RM: kapannnnn yaa? Sampe targetnya terpenuhi sayang. Makanya yukk ajak teman kerabat bestie fambest kalian join momme🤤🤤

4 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC139 viewsread 8 August 2026

RM: Kaga ada seleksi nder, lu cuma perlu ngikut rules sama pake atb aj

4 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC136 viewsread 8 August 2026

📝 Tanya seputar oplink yuk mommae 👤 Ini oplink nya sampe kapan? 👤 iyaa sama link nya exp. anw kangen sama mommae, mau masuk lagi takut huhu 👤 kangen masuk mommae, masuk lagi leh gasi 👤 oplink sampe kapan ini 👤 gw mau join tapi pas klik buat add-list itu dah expired ☹️ gimana… 👥 5 people have voted so far. 📖 Anonymous Board

4 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC149 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

OPEN MEMBER 𝐌𝐎𝐌𝐌𝐀𝐄 💋 (الذهب • الأناقة • الهيبة) There is no need to seek attention, because true elegance naturally captivates every eye. 💋 🤩rapped in luxury and crowned with confidence, MOMMAE opens its doors for women who carry charisma, dignity, and irresistible allure. 🕑 Here, every presence tells a story. Every step reflects الهيبة. Every smile carries الجمال. Every woman deserves her own throne. ☹️ "Th

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @OFCMOMMAE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 29,486 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 185 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

1.14 ── &' 𝗚𝗟𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗢𝗨𝗦, 𝗟𝗘𝗜𝗔𝗥𝗘𝗦 𝗦𝗤𝗨𝗔𝗗
@LEIARESSQUAD · 8,393
12 posts
𝗠𝗘𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗘𝗦 - 𝗢𝗙𝗖 𝗕𝗔𝗝𝗜𝗡𝗚𝗔𝗡 𝗠𝗨𝗗𝗔
@OFCBAJINGANMUDA · 10,225
8 posts
VAKUM | ”RYDESTER HIDE:ØUT ..+/🫀🪬
@RYDESTER · 9,834
8 posts
𝗩𝗔𝗞𝗨𝗠 // 𝐒𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐊𝐒 𝐊𝐈𝐋𝐋𝐄𝐑
@SHARKSKILLER · 17,045
8 posts
𝗢𝗣𝗘𝗡 𝗟𝗜𝗡𝗞 — 𝐔𝐃𝐀𝐊𝐓𝐇
@Datuk_Kth · 6,861
5 posts
𝗗𝗜𝗥𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗩𝗘 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗢𝗫
@DIRECTVENOX · 21,831
5 posts
𝐆𝐎𝐋𝐃𝐄𝐍 𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐓𝐀𝐒 𝐒𝐂𝐇𝐎𝐎𝐋
@golden_sch · 10,370
5 posts
𝑮𝑹𝑰𝑴 𝑹𝑬𝑨𝑷𝑬𝑹 𝑶𝑭𝑭𝑰𝑪𝑬 𝑺𝑸𝑼𝑨𝑫
@GRIMREAPER_OFC · 2,610
5 posts
REKOMENDASI FILM
@REKOMENDASIFILMN · 2,739
5 posts
⛩️ 𝐈𝐌𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐀𝐋 𝐓𝐈𝐀𝐍𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐀𝐂𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐌𝐘 (天命)
@TIANMINGACADEMY · 5,839
5 posts
𝒞. 𝐂𝐀𝐄𝐋𝐕𝐈𝐑𝐎𝐍 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐍𝐓 𝐎𝐑𝐆𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐙𝐄𝐑
@CAELVIRONOFC · 7,153
4 posts
[HIATUS] 𝗘𝗡-𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗖𝗘𝗥 '⅋─𝗡Ξ𝗪 𝝨𝗥Λ
@OFCENFORCER · 21,524
4 posts
𝐏𝐀𝐏𝐈𝐋𝐈𝐎𝐏𝐈𝐂𝐓𝐔𝐒 𝐒𝐂𝐇𝐎𝐎𝐋
@OFCPAPILIOPICTUS · 4,321
4 posts
𝐎𝐅𝐅𝐈𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋 𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐒𝐓-𝐎𝐍𝐄𝐒
@OFCRHONES · 215
4 posts
𝐒𝐖𝐀𝐍𝐋𝐀𝐊𝐄 𝐒𝐂𝐇𝐎𝐎𝐋
@SWANLAKEOFC · 6,555
4 posts
𝐁𝐔𝐁𝐀𝐑 || 𝟒𝟖. 𝐊𝐎𝐒𝐀𝐍𝐓 𝐀𝐁𝐀𝐇
@KosantAbah · 2,020
3 posts
(ROMBAK) 𝐍𝐎𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐀𝐕𝐈𝐑𝐄
@NOECTAVIRE · 1,476
3 posts
◖ 𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐓𝐄𝐃 𝐀𝐒𝐏𝐈𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐓𝐒 𝐍𝕺𝐕𝐀 𝐀𝐂𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐌𝐘 ◗
@OFFICIALUNAD · 9,602
3 posts
𝐎𝐋𝐘𝐌𝐏𝐔𝐒 𝐂𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐓 𝐀𝐂𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐌𝐘
@OLYMPUSCREST · 1,376
3 posts
[𝐂𝐋𝐎𝐒𝐄 𝐀𝐃𝐎𝐏𝐒𝐈] 𝐏𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐢 𝐀𝐬𝐮𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐕𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐲 𝐇𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐧
@PantiAsuhanPrimroseValleyHaven · 3,027
3 posts
𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗥 𝗜𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗬𝗢𝗨
@POSTERIFORTE · 4,423
3 posts
LIBUR | 𝗣𝗬𝗥𝗛𝗜𝗘𝕮𝗘𝗟𝗬𝗔 𝗛𝗢𝕾𝗣𝗜𝗧𝗔𝗟
@PYRHIECELYAHOFC · 2,036
3 posts
𝗩𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗘𝗥𝗤𝗨𝗔𝗦𝗧
@VANDERQUAST · 11,541
3 posts
𝗩𝗨𝗟𝗞𝗔𝗡𝗨𝗦 : 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗘𝗥𝗔
@VULKANUSOFC · 16,627
3 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ÖFÇ MỖṂMΛΣ.” (@OFCMOMMAE), 5,010 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OFCMOMMAE.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.