Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ocgeopoliticas

Channel

ocgeopoliticas

@OCGeopoliticas

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

5subscribers

-45 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001876210343
TypeChannel
Username@OCGeopoliticas
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/OCGeopoliticas

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15025.57 August 2026 — 50 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1 subscribers19 September 2026 — 3 subscribers4 October 2026 — 5 subscribers57 August 20264 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 58 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Oct 2026, 11:405+2
19 Sept 2026, 10:003+2
16 Aug 2026, 18:261-49
10 Aug 2026, 11:3050no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:4150first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍675.0%
❤225.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2025 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Las izquierdas latinoamericanas se rehúsan a reconocer que el chavizmo desfalleció hace tiempo, pero fue aniquilado en enero del 2026. El problema de no reconocer este simple hecho es que, al no tener un diagnóstico correcto de la situación, esas mismas izquierdas son incapaces de reavivar el chavizmo para resistir, contener y revertir el injerencismo estadounidense.

👍1

17 Jul 2026, 05:46 UTC28 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Narcotráfico y geopolítica: entre la injerencia extranjera y la fragmentación interna Ricardo Orozco | la Docta Ignorancia - Inclusive si Marina del Pilar no tiene nada que temer ni ante la justicia mexicana ni ante la estadounidense, la presidencia de México no puede darse el lujo de perder de vista que, producto de su política partidista de los últimos siete años, en el Movimiento de Regeneración Nacional han encon…

18 Jun 2026, 01:56 UTC42 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

En verdad son increíbles los términos del acuerdo. No porque Irán no merezca liberarse de las presiones estadounidenses (lo merece, por respeto a su soberanía) sino, antes bien, por lo mucho que habría cedido una de las presidencias estadounidenses más islamófobas en décadas.

👍2

9 Apr 2026, 15:05 UTC69 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

México y la voracidad energética del capitalismo Ricardo Orozco | la Docta Ignorancia - La presidenta de México, Claudia Sheinbaum, anunció una política a favor de la extracción de gas natural no convencional (fracking) para satisfacer la creciente demanda energética y asegurar la soberanía energética del país. A pesar de que su administración busca alternativas técnicas para mitigar daños ecológicos y ambientales, e…

❤1

17 Mar 2026, 17:51 UTC61 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Donald Trump y el narcotráfico en México Ricardo Orozco | la Docta Ignorancia - Es innegable la creciente insistencia de Donald Trump en intervenir militarmente en México bajo el argumento de combatir al narcotráfico. La creación de la iniciativa "Escudo de las Américas", diseñada para legitimar acciones armadas y aislar gobiernos de izquierda en la región es síntoma de ello. En un contexto como éste, en el que progr…

👍1

18 Feb 2026, 17:24 UTC67 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Perú en la órbita imperial sino-estadounidense Ricardo Orozco | la Docta Ignorancia - Tras la publicación de la nueva Estrategia de Seguridad Nacional de Trump, Perú se ha convertido en un foco de atención para Estados Unidos. El puerto de Chancay, operado mayoritariamente por capitales chinos, es crucial para la estrategia de comercio entre ambos países. Recientes decisiones judiciales en Perú han limitado la superv…

10 Feb 2026, 03:26 UTC60 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Minerales estratégicos, disputas hegemónicas y equilibrios ecológicos Ricardo Orozco | la Docta Ignorancia - El 4 de febrero de 2023, se realizó en Washington D.C. la Primera Reunión Ministerial de Minerales Críticos, convocada por el Departamento de Estado de EE. UU., con la participación de delegaciones de cerca de cincuenta países. A pesar de las altas expectativas, los resultados fueron limitados, destacando la f…

6 Feb 2026, 18:08 UTC53 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Se nos fue uno de nuestros más brillantes intelectuales Universitarios. Probablemente el último representante de su generación y de todo un espíritu de época del pensamiento crítico americano. Referente indiscutible de congruencia ética, política e intelectual. - 1940-2026

5 Feb 2026, 15:35 UTC55 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Episodio 04. México y la difícil resistencia en Cuba - En Spotify. https://open.spotify.com/episode/1uZ0unsR2BfVW2VUzVmTJB?si=-0uSjfBBS3OR41YTvgBa3w

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OCGeopoliticas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ocgeopoliticas” (@OCGeopoliticas), 5 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OCGeopoliticas.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.