Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ∞ O Baricentro da Mente

Channel

∞ O Baricentro da Mente

@OBaricentroDaMente

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

218subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001260220095
TypeChannel
Username@OBaricentroDaMente
Created16 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/OBaricentroDaMente

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2182202196 August 2026 — 219 subscribers7 August 2026 — 219 subscribers30 September 2026 — 220 subscribers10 October 2026 — 218 subscribers6 August 202610 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 65 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 218–220 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Oct 2026, 10:21218-2
30 Sept 2026, 15:16220+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:30219no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:08219first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 17 July 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 October 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1275.0%
❤425.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2020 to 30 October 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Oct 2022, 00:38 UTC799 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Na antiguidade, os babilônios foram os que mais se interessaram pela Astronomia e durante séculos enfrentaram problemas com os cálculos que eram muito trabalhosos. . Os logaritmos surgiram para simplificar cálculos, já que transformam multiplicação em soma e divisão em subtração, dando um salto na Matemática e na Astronomia. . O termo logaritmo foi criado por Napier, que vem de logos e arithmos, que significam razão …

👍8❤4

10 Jul 2021, 20:34 UTC≈1,190 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ProfEdigleyAlexandrePhoto

O Teorema de Stewart relaciona os comprimentos dos lados de um triângulo com o comprimento de uma ceviana, sendo aplicável a uma ceviana qualquer. O post traz um pouco de história e duas demonstrações, devidamente e perfeitamente organizadas em Latex. Leia o post completo de @OBaricentroDaMente no link abaixo.

👍1

20 Apr 2021, 21:34 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Para ver a solução, acesse o blog através do link: http://bit.ly/sudoku-mat-2

16 Jan 2021, 01:28 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 7 August 2026

Sofia nasceu em 15 de janeiro de 1850 em Moscou e morreu em 10 de fevereiro de 1891 em Estocolmo. Foi a primeira mulher a ser nomeada para a Academia de Ciências da Rússia e a terceira a conseguir um cargo acadêmico como professora na Universidade de Estocolmo. Destacou-se por suas contribuições para a teoria das equações diferenciais e funções abelianas, recebendo o prêmio Borodin da Academia de Ciências da Suécia…

9 Jan 2021, 00:50 UTC934 viewsread 7 August 2026

Stephen William Hawking nasceu em Oxford, Inglaterra em 8 de janeiro de 1942 e morreu em Cambridge em 14 de março de 2018. . Stephen Hawking foi um físico teórico e cosmólogo, reconhecido internacionalmente por sua contribuição à ciência, sendo um dos mais renomados cientistas. Foi professor lucasiano emérito na Universidade de Cambridge, um posto que foi ocupado por Isaac Newton, Paul Dirac e Charles Babbage. Foi, p…

2 Nov 2020, 17:17 UTC791 viewsread 7 August 2026

A lógica como ciência remonta a Aristóteles (384-322a.C.), seu criador. No século XVII Descartes (1596-1650) e Leibniz (1646-1716) tencionaram dotá-la de padrões matemáticos, o que pressupões uma simbologia e um cálculo formal próprios. O alcance dessa lógica seria universal, aplicável a todos os campos do conhecimento. Mas nenhum dos dois deixou sobre o assunto senão alguns escritos fragmentados. Inclusive a contrib…

25 Sept 2020, 09:29 UTC727 viewsread 7 August 2026

Moysés Nussenzveig "Halliday é livro pra engenheiro, físico tem que usar é o Moysés!" Você conhece o professor Herch Moysés Nussenzveig? Ele é Bacharel e doutor em física pela Universidade de São Paulo, foi pesquisador do Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas de 1962 a 1968, quando foi para a Universidade de Rochester, nos Estados Unidos, onde permaneceu até 1975. Após retornar ao Brasil, foi professor do Institu…

7 Sept 2020, 16:53 UTC663 viewsread 7 August 2026

George Pólya nasceu em 13 de dezembro de 1887 em Budapeste e morreu em 7 de setembro de 1985. Em seu livro "A arte de resolver problemas", Pólya, nos ensina como resolver um problema partindo de quatro etapas: 1) Compreenda o problema; 2) Estabeleça um plano; 3) Execute o plano; 4) Examine a solução obtida. Pólya foi professor de matemática de 1914 a 1940 no ETH Zürich na Suíça e de 1940 a 1953 na Stanford Univers…

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @OBaricentroDaMente. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“∞ O Baricentro da Mente” (@OBaricentroDaMente), 218 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OBaricentroDaMente.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.