Channel
@OBMG1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,685subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002703745842 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OBMG1 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 29 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OBMG1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 2,685 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 2,684 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 2,681 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 2,681 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
16 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 6 | 37.5% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 31.3% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 31.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2025 to 30 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Medgard OB pinned «بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم هذه القناة تحتوي على جميع أسئلة MG OB/GYN ، بحيث يمكن لأي شخص اختبار نفسه في أي وقت ومن أي مكان، خصوصًا عبر Telegram المتوفر على جميع الأجهزة. قنوات باقي التخصصات: يمكن الوصول إلى 6 قنوات برابط واحد: 🔗 اضغط هنا للوصول للقنوات htt…»
Select the correct option:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🙏5
623 - A 22-year-old woman presents to the clinic complaining of pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia. She denies any history of fever or vaginal discharge. Ultrasound was performed (see image and report). Blood pressure 110/70 mmHg Heart rate 76 /min Respiratory rate 18 /min Temperature 36.6 °C Ultrasound: Describes the appearance as containing "ground glass* internal echoes Which of the following would be best…
❤1
Select the correct option:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
255 - A 23-year-old woman presented with vaginal discharge with an unpleasant smell. Examination confirmed a homogenous grayish-white vaginal discharge that has a high PH. A saline wet- preparation examination of the discharge showed "clue cells* and with application of potassium hydroxide a fishy smell was generated. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
❤1
Select the correct option:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
642 - Post-menopausal women asked her gynecologist for hormone replacement therapy. The gynecologist explained to the women that no evidence support the use of hormone replacement therapy in her case. The women insisted. Which of the following is the most appropriate action?
💯1
Select the correct option:
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
641 - A couple suffering infertility asked the feto-maternal consultant about surrogacy as an option to treat their infertility. The hospital does not offer the service and the consultant is not sure if surrogacy is legal in Saudi Arabia. Which of the following is the most appropriate action?
💯1
Select the correct option:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
640 - A 30-year-old woman G4 P3003 is pregnant at 37 weeks with a history of cesarean section due to non- reassuring fetal heart trace. Currently, she is in labor with breech presentation. Her inquiry is possibility of external cephalic version. Which of the following would be an absolute contraindication of external cephalic version?
Select the correct option:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OBMG1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Select the correct option:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Select the correct option:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Select the correct option:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Select the correct option:
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Select the correct option:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Select the correct option:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2025 to 30 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 757,795 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Medgard OB” (@OBMG1), 2,685 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OBMG1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.