4 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,068–1,075 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 19:57
1,074
+5
9 Aug 2026, 23:37
1,069
-5
6 Aug 2026, 12:36
1,074
no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:17
1,074
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.2%
avg views ÷ 1,074 subscribers
Avg views / post
239
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (8 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
3,819
Reactions total
141
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
193 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
46
23.8%
❤
36
18.7%
custom 5309850978369948522
32
16.6%
👏
32
16.6%
👍
22
11.4%
🤔
10
5.18%
custom 5309967006911450548
9
4.66%
🤯
4
2.07%
😱
2
1.04%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏆 Опубликованы результаты WEALTH Navigator Legal 2026
С радостью сообщаем, что команда O2-STREAM вновь вошла в число лидеров рейтинга юридических фирм, сопровождающих состоятельных частных клиентов.
В этом году команда рекомендована в 24 категориях:
17 — в статусе «Лидер»
7 — в статусе «Ведущая фирма»
По сравнению с прошлым годом O2-STREAM сохранила все ранее отмеченные позиции, получила 6 новых рекомендаций и уси…
А как считаете вы: ИИ-изображения — это творчество?
Да, если человек придумал идею и управлял результатом62%
Нет, это технический результат работы программы14%
Зависит от степени участия человека33%
Пока рано делать общий вывод5%
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ИИ-изображения и авторское право: где заканчивается технический процесс и начинается творчество?
В последние месяцы суды всё чаще сталкиваются с вопросами, которые еще недавно казались скорее теоретическими: можно ли защищать авторским правом изображения, созданные с помощью нейросети, и достаточно ли промпта, чтобы признать за человеком творческий вклад?
Софья Смирнова, советник M&A и корпоративной практики, руков…
Новая реформа банкротства юридических лиц: что изменится
26 июля 2026 года подписан Федеральный закон № 253-ФЗ, который существенно меняет действующую модель банкротства юридических лиц.
Евгений Клементьев, партнер, руководитель практики банкротства, Евгения Пешкова, старший партнер, руководитель практики «Строительство и недвижимость», адвокат, и Анастасия Ерошина, младший юрист O2-STREAM, разобрали ключевые полож…
ФАС vs ЦУМ: картельный сговор в люксовом ритейле
ФАС привлекла к ответственности ООО «Меркури мода» (управляет ЦУМ, ДЛТ и «Барвиха Luxury Village») за картельный сговор. Компания оспаривает решения в суде. К делам в качестве третьих лиц привлечены Guccio Gucci, Dolce & Gabbana и другие люксовые бренды, а также ритейлер 12 Storeez.
Что это значит для рынка?
Старший партнер О2-STREAM, адвокат Ирина Медведская коммент…
Выгрузка данных в ИИ-сервис может быть признана разглашением коммерческой тайны
Софья Смирнова, советник M&A и корпоративной практики, руководитель практики AI & Legal Tech платформы O2-STREAM, подготовила правовой алерт о судебном деле, в котором передача работником данных во внешний ИИ-сервис была квалифицирована как разглашение охраняемых сведений.
Коротко о деле:
— работник занимал должность директора по прода…
В деловых кругах сейчас активно обсуждаются изменения в ТК РФ, увеличивающие лимиты сверхурочных работ.
Мы решили поделиться своими соображениями, чтобы вы могли спокойно оценить, насколько это актуально для вашей компании.
Действительно, с 1 сентября 2026 года закон разрешит увеличить годовой лимит сверхурочных работ. И нужно признать, в текущей экономической ситуации, когда кадровый голод стал ощутимой реальность…
UBS называет ближайшие десятилетия периодом «великого трансфера капитала»: к 2048 году между поколениями состоятельных частных лиц может быть передано около 83,5 трлн долларов США. В России совокупное состояние детей только 20 самых богатых бизнесменов по версии Forbes оценивается в 362,4 млрд долларов США.
При этом The Wall Street Journal отмечает, что процесс передачи капитала часто недооценивают: он может быть бо…
14 июля 2026 года Банк России опубликовал официальное разъяснение № 1-ОР, в котором уточнил отдельные вопросы применения Указа Президента РФ от 5 марта 2022 года № 95 при исполнении обязательств по договорам банковского вклада / депозита.
Разъяснение применяется с 14 июля 2026 года.
Ключевые положения:
1. Ограничения Указа № 95 не распространяются на банковские счета
Банк России подтвердил, что договор банковского с…
Уважаемые коллеги, в продолжение нашего предыдущего поста о новом регулировании цифровых валют и цифровых прав делимся полным алертом по теме.
Дарья Носова, партнер, руководитель практики цифрового права и интеллектуальной собственности O2-Stream, подготовила подробный обзор нового Закона «О цифровых валютах и цифровых правах».
В алерте разобраны ключевые изменения, которые затрагивают рынок цифровых активов:
🤩как…
ФНС обратила внимание на «зависшую» дебиторскую задолженность иностранных контрагентов
Летом 2026 года налоговые органы начали массово направлять требования компаниям, у которых есть просроченная дебиторская задолженность иностранных контрагентов.
Причина — истечение трехлетних сроков исковой давности по обязательствам 2022–2023 годов. Для бизнеса это означает, что «зависшая» дебиторка постепенно переходит из бухга…
🔥7👍3👏2🤔2🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @O2ConsultingTeam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А как считаете вы: ИИ-изображения — это творчество?
Да, если человек придумал идею и управлял результатом62%
Нет, это технический результат работы программы14%
Зависит от степени участия человека33%
Пока рано делать общий вывод5%
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 447,885 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@O2ConsultingTeam named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@o2consulting1 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LawLawLand” (@O2ConsultingTeam), 1,074 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/O2ConsultingTeam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
