💢 🔸گزارشهای منابع عربی حاکی از حمله به جده، عربستان سعودی است و به همین علت هواپیماهای غیرنظامی از فرود در فرودگاه جده خودداری میکنند. 🚫@NowarNosanctions🚫

Channel
کمیته ضدجنگ و تحریم 🇮🇷 🎒
@NowarNosanctions
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,991subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001434354665 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NowarNosanctions |
| Created | 16 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NowarNosanctions |
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “کمیته ضدجنگ و تحریم علیه مردم” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 3,991 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:19 | 4,001 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 4,001 | first reading |
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.3%
- avg views ÷ 3,991 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 410
- 48 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.17%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 48
- of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 46 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 48 (5 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 19,667 |
| Reactions total | 415 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 27m 32s
- Average length
- 2m 18s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
263 reactions across 25 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 93 | 35.4% | |
| ❤ | 39 | 14.8% | |
| 💩 | 32 | 12.2% | |
| 😁 | 17 | 6.46% | |
| 🤬 | 15 | 5.70% | |
| 👎 | 12 | 4.56% | |
| 💔 | 12 | 4.56% | |
| 😢 | 11 | 4.18% | |
| 🤡 | 10 | 3.80% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 3.04% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 1.90% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 1.52% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 0.76% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 0.76% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 415reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
💢فایننشال تایمز: صادرات نفت ایران متوقف و مخازن خارک تا ۶۰ درصد پُر شده! فایننشال تایمز: صادرات نفت ایران متوقف شده و جزیره خارک تحت محاصره آمریکا بیکار مانده است. در تصویر، وضعیت پُر شدگی مخازن نفت جزیره خارک را میبینید. با اجرای محاصره اول و دوم، به دلیل عدم امکان صادرات نفت ایران، این مخازن شروع به پر شدن کردند. در محاصره اول، این مخازن تا ۹۰ درصد ظرفیت خود پُر شده و حالا بعد از کاهش به ۳۵ درصد در دوره اجرای…
🥴2😢2👎1
💢چرا نباید بگوییم دریای خزر؟ 🔻احمد کاظمی کارشناس مسائل بینالملل: 🔸به کار بردن نام «دریای خزر» بهجای «دریای کاسپین» (یا مازندران) یک پروژهی عمدی تلقی میشود، چون واژهی «خزر» به قومی یهودی‑ترک در قفقاز شمالی نسبت داده میشود. 🔸در حالی که نام اصیل و بینالمللی این دریا، برگرفته از قوم ایرانی «کاسپی» است و اصرار بر «خزر» میتواند بار حقوقی داشته و به حقوق تاریخی ایران لطمه بزند. 🚫@NowarNosanctions🚫
👍17
💢شرکت برجسته نفتی امارات: ۱۵ شناور ما در جنگ علیه ایران آسیب دید شرکت ادنوک، غول نفتی امارات اعلام کرد که از زمان آغاز جنگ علیه ایران، ۱۵ فروند از شناورهای این شرکت با موشک یا پهپاد مورد اصابت قرار گرفتهاند. 🚫@NowarNosanctions🚫
🔥5👏1
💢توییت دیمیتری مدودف در سالگرد بمباران اتمی هیروشیما 🚫@NowarNosanctions🚫
👍12
💢آمریکا باید از خاورمیانه دست بکشد 🔻فارن افرز: 🔸 جنگ ایران یک فاجعه تمامعیار است. ایالات متحده و اسرائیل با نقض قوانین بینالمللی، حداقل هزار و ۷۰۰ غیرنظامی ایرانی را به کام مرگ فرستاده و زیرساختهای غیرنظامی را به شدت تخریب کردهاند. در مقابل، تلافی ایران جان ۱۸ سرباز آمریکایی را گرفته و بیش از ۶۰۰ نفر را مجروح کرده است. بسته شدن تنگه هرمز هم قیمت انرژی را در سراسر جهان افزایش و اقتصاد جهانی را تحت فشار قرار داد…
❤3
💢المیادین به نقل از یک منبع در وزارت خارجه پاکستان: به احتمال زیاد، عباس عراقچی، وزیر امور خارجه ایران، روز دوشنبه به پاکستان سفر خواهد کرد 🚫@NowarNosanctions🚫
🥱2👎1
💢وزارت خارجه آمریکا از وضع تحریمهای جدید علیه ایران خبر داد 🔹وزارت خارجه آمریکا در بیانیهای اعلام کرد اقدامات جدیدی برای قطع مبادلات مالی با ایران انجام داده است. 🔹در بیانیۀ وزارت خارجه آمریکا آمده: اقدامات ما شبکهای از شرکتهای مبادله مالی و شرکتهای صوری که به ایران برای نقل و انتقال میلیونها دلار پول کمک کردهاند را هدف قرار میدهد. 🚫@NowarNosanctions🚫
💩6
💢 بحران در ناو آمریکایی/مادر یک سرباز از کمبود غذا و امکانات پرده برداشت مادر یکی از سربازان آمریکایی حاضر در جنگ با ایران گفت: پسرم میگوید جیره غذایی آنها به دو عدد نان ترتیلا و یک قوطی برنج محدود شده است. دوشها کپکزدهاند، سرویسهای بهداشتی بهدرستی کار نمیکنند، ماشینهای لباسشویی هفتههاست از کار افتادهاند و برای خرید از فروشگاه کشتی باید یک تا دو ساعت در صف بایستند. با این حال، هنگام رسیدن نوبتشان، حتی ا…
🤩4
💢روایت راب هریسون پژوهشگر ارشد آمریکایی در بیبیسی از آشفتگی و سردرگمی ترامپ در جنگ با ایران اکنون ترامپ نمیداند چگونه پشیمانی خود را ابراز کند و اوضاع را به شرایط قبل از جنگ بازگرداند؛ اما ایران مصمم است این پیام را به آمریکا منتقل کند که هرگز به شرایط پیش از جنگ بازنخواهد گشت! 🚫@NowarNosanctions🚫
👍4
💢تعجب اسرائیلی ها از تجدید اسنجام نیروهای نظامی ایران بعد از آشفتگی ضربه اول 🔸پ.ن: گفتگوی رزا پرتو تحلیل گر سیاسی 🚫@NowarNosanctions🚫
💢در یک کلیپ از مستند آتی الکس هولدر با عنوان "بازی لیندسی "، بنیامین نتانیاهو، در جمع تعدادی از سناتورهای آمریکا ، آهنگ "تولدت مبارک" را برای سناتور بدرک واصل شده لیندسی گراهام میخواند و یک تکه کیک به او میدهد. گراهام با شوخطبعی میگوید: "شما باید کیکی را که سعودیها برای من آورده بودند، میدیدید." این لحظه در ماه ژوئیه سال 2025 در «بلر هاوس» فیلمبرداری شده است . 🔻«بلر هاوس» (Blair House) با نام رسمی «اقامتگا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @NowarNosanctions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 532,954 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کمیته ضدجنگ و تحریم 🇮🇷 🎒” (@NowarNosanctions), 3,991 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NowarNosanctions.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.