Channel
@NorthAmericans
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
389subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001339118748 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NorthAmericans |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NorthAmericans |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 06:59 | 389 | +4 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 21:16 | 385 | +5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:35 | 380 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 379 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 381 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 382 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 382 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
28 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 18 | 64.3% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 28.6% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2025 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#vehicle 既然预期燃料价格上涨，为何人们不大量储存燃油去规避。首先排除安全原因来谈，主要因为燃油是快消品，油厂只储备原料原油，但并不储备成品油，比如柴油和汽油。主要因为汽车对油的要求有季节性，冬天的油需要高挥发性，使冷启动更容易。夏天则相反，需要抑制挥发。跨季节储存的油并不利于发动机。这与标号无关，任何标号对挥发性的要求是一样的。另外，柴油有个特性，会滋生细菌等微生物，时间久了滋生物会堵塞燃油系统。
#Business 加拿大EI攻略。首先，要弄清领EI的几个先决条件，辞退，因病，或季节性解雇，学徒去上学等。然后，一定要督促雇主，在做工资的软件里上报上述类别，如果新公司以前从没做过这种事，让雇主去service canada开相关企业账户，开户完成再去做“解雇”上报，这步完成后，员工的service canada account EI 类别下能看到ROE，也就是能看到被雇主“解雇”的详情，包括第一天和最后一天上班的日期，发了多少次工资，每次多少钱。Service canada 就是根据这个数字来决定给你发多少EI。不管你是发月薪还是周薪还是双周薪，都先从这个表格中取一个最高数字，比如里面有13个月的月薪，取个最高数4000乘以 12 得到你的最高年薪48000，然后除以52得到最高周薪923，再乘以55%的EI率得到507，再乘以2 就是你的双周EI = 1015。
❤1
#Vehicle 混动车的波箱油与普通车的区别，普通AT或CVT波箱油非常重要，粘度，配方，工作温度下的液位，油温，油压等都有严格标准，甚至会有传感器检测杂质含量，换新油后还得发指令让传感器重新测量。这就让这类波箱油更换非常麻烦。但混动完全不同，波箱里主要是齿轮和电机，没有滤芯，没有离合片，没有阀体，没有液力变矩器，不需建立高压，不需要测量工作温度下液位，甚至没有温度传感器。原理上来说，普通车波箱油是液压油，靠正确压力传递动力。但混动波箱油更像是润滑油，除了要保证配方不伤电机绕组外，似乎不需要担心太多，换油也就是放多少加多少，甚至比换机油还简单。
👍3
#Vehicle 车险流程总结。1，事故发生48小时内去警察局报告，拿到一个案件编号。2，用这个编号去你保险公司claim 。3，等待第三方责任判定，这个时间有点长，在此期间可以要求保险公司先做损失评估。拿到一个具体的金额数字。4，责任判定出来之后进入维修阶段，这时保险公司会让你选个维修店铺，或者如果你有自付免赔额，上一步等待期间就可以进入维修阶段。你如果选择不去店铺修，可以要求cash settlement in lieu of repairs... 只需让保险公司做损失评估，但一定注意，实际评估单位(维修店)默认你保险公司付钱修，如果你说只评估他们会收你评估费，一定让保险专员给你免费评估的正确途径。5， 维修或拿现金。拿现金的情况下，通常少于保险公司付给店铺的维修费，但保险专员不会主动引导你拿现金。拿了现金的弊端是，保险公司会默认在系统标注损坏部位没修好，那么如果下次事故是同样位置，他们就不再受理你的claim 。
❤2
#Business 美国宪法法院判决总统关税违宪之后，总统本人的反应倒是正常，大骂一通然后威胁动用特别条款增加新的关税。副总统的反应是，最高法院违法。等于是直截了当的否定三权分立。前副总统彭斯说，这是人民的胜利，是吗？高院只是维护了宪法，说清楚了原则问题，之前已经征的税，大多数进口商交的，现在他们可以去下级法院告，有高法判例在，大概率排队处理后都能拿回来。Walmart这种大企业早把价格加给消费者了，现在再退一道税，等于因祸得福收益大增，已经吃亏买高价的美国人能得到什么赔偿？美国人民真胜利了吗？自己选的总统，后果自己承担。
#Society 爱泼斯坦案，有没有中国人牵连进去？ 这个要分两方面去看，一是受害人，这个岛上的幼童性奴选择是有极严格的标准，黄幼黑幼这些是不入白人大爷的法眼的，只有白幼才够资格，富裕的美国人谁会把自己女儿送去，就算是孤儿都有社会机构托管，受害群体主要来自己东欧白人国家，像立陶宛，格鲁吉亚，罗马尼亚，乌克兰，不过这些国家在历史上也是人口贩卖出口国，有不少90年代的记录片有证，人家也不觉得这有啥丢人，这一点跟中国观念一样：穷才是最丢人的。另一方面就加害人，本来大家以为不就是美国政商两界台面上这些大人物（不分男女），但实际上这个圈子很大，目前开始扩大到欧洲各国以及王室成员，中国人在党国的组织内混，人家是不会被带你玩的，除非是带着任务打入敌人内部的卧底或叛徒。所以目前为止，这两个层面都没有中国人牵连进去。
👍3
#House 加拿大房产税各city自理，上半年市议会的主要工作是，根据未来一年预算确定税率，各团体或选区的议会代表会充分博弈出一个较为平衡的税率，在通胀时期，税率每年都涨，但有个上限。与此同时税基确定同步进行，一二月份，商业或私有不动产陆续收到价值评估单，有异议在规定时间内反馈复核。第一遍复核由市政府专业部门进行，大部分都在这一步拦下，维持评估价并给出理由，如果不服，那就要填表提交到第三方独立评估，可能要付费，但结果未必会推翻原评估，除非有充分证据。也很少有人能走完这一步拿到一个满意的低税基。税年年涨，但公共服务质量年年不足。
#House Edmonton 开了个极坏的先例，2026房产评估价普遍涨10%左右，以前一直低于市场价，今年一次性反超。看来地税税率不能提太高，那就提高房产评估价。开了这个先例，也许以后再也不参考市场价，按需评估，议会不同意提供税率那就提高全民税基。不同意砍开支，人口膨胀，公共开支涨价，政府的主要责任变成怎么搞钱，加拿大正在破产道路上狂奔。
#Business 为什么说阿省并不适合建数据中心？目前的事实的，从数据中心数量看，加拿大是全球第5，而国内第一名是安省，奎省第二，然后是BC，阿省只是老四而已。数据说话，资本并不认为阿省适合建数据中心。很多人凭感觉认为阿省这么冷应该散热有优势，这是事实但并不是资本考虑的主要因素，首要因素是电价，而电价由人口规模和发电方式决定。阿省电价属于高档位，因为7成是高成本的天然气发电，而安省和魁省低电价是因为核电和水电。第二因素是人口，离消费目标近，同时人才也多。这一点阿省也不具备。单纯看散热优势那应该建在北极圈才对，感觉往往不靠谱。
👍2
#Education 学徒制的几个要点。1, 并不是先有雇主才能注册学徒，根据不同项目和学校，有些是可以先入学，然后学校有人帮你找雇主。2，同样的项目各省认证标准不同，跨省不直接转换，原因参考著名的安省电工证案例。3，各项目学习时长不一样，最终拿到的认证级别不同，有些是证书，有些是文凭，有些还会叠加省内红印认证。4，只有本省PR或公民可以注册，如果没有加拿大高中学历，需要入学考试，内容涉及高中一二年级数学，英语和科学。5，中途可以换雇主，之前累积的工时继续有效。6，雇主签工时数字化，注册学徒后与雇主账号绑定，雇主在系统内录入工时，没有传统的签工时蓝本子。7，对大多数项目来说，每级别的考试由学校负责，完成所有级别后并不能拿到证书或学历，通过省内统考后，同时拿到红印和学历双证。简言之，学徒制项目并不全等于红印。8，只完成部分级别会拿到阶段证书，或结业证，这对找工作也用帮助。9，雇主签工时意味着sponsorship, 不能以此为由收…
#Social 阿省学校今天重开，老师依法强制返岗。但实际上罢工仍在继续，只是转移到校内。他们会在校内罢工，工资也恢复了，还能威胁人质/学生家长和雇主，比在街头挨冻抗议强，这就是目前老师们的想法，也是工会传达的指示。正常雇佣关系走到这一步，雇主雇员必有一方提出解除关系，但因为工会在，雇主无法解雇雇员，而雇员都想博弈一下使利益最大化。说白了就是拿娃娃做筹码。让家长实实在在感受到压力，间接“迫使”政府屈服。 政府的有限资金来自纳税人，如果每个公共行业都想分更多，必然其它公共事业受损。如果政府无法平衡这些利害，那就是失败的政府。接下来，全省医护正在酝酿新一轮罢工。Alberta calling 还有魔力吗？
👎2❤1
#Immigration 曼省提名意外的发出3347份邀请，全年配额的一多半一次性发出。虽然邀请信不等于获得PR，但LAA最终到PR的转化率约为75%，25% 淘汰率主要发生在省提名审核阶段，联邦阶段不太会拒省提名。本次海底捞不要太高兴，看下发放占比，55.8% 为国际生通道，42.5%为乌克兰通道，只有不到3% 才是雇主通道，又名为战略招聘通道。接下来曼省提名又做了较大改变，增加了一个试点，TRRP境内雇主担保，看上去就是以前最容易移民的那个通道，只不过提高了门槛，对雇主的要求限定了行业为IT，建筑，食品，农业，酒店，医卫和教育制造，而且要求过去三年外劳留存率50%以上，这个有点难。对申请人的要求：已全职18个月以上，曼省居住时长大于外省，年龄21-45，语言CLB5，有效工签小于1年。 这与过去的条件相比，无论从雇主还是申请人，都提高了不少。从总的省提名总名额来看也并没有提高。曼省难度继续提高。
👍3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NorthAmericans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NorthAmericans🇨🇦🇺🇸” (@NorthAmericans), 389 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NorthAmericans.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.