Channel
@Norm_3D_Pechat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
170subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001136611239 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Norm_3D_Pechat |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 31 October 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Norm_3D_Pechat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:49 | 170 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 168 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 169 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 169 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 26 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
28 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 14 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 32.1% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 17.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2023 to 4 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
100 АВИАЦИОННЫХ ДЕТАЛЕЙ, НАПЕЧАТАННЫХ НА 3D-ПРИНТЕРЕ Чешско-словацкая авиационная компания SHARK-AERO имеет богатую историю, насчитывающую более 30 лет, и прошла путь от производителя запчастей до известного бренда одних из самых быстрых существующих сверхлегких самолетов - Shark. Производственный процесс SHARK-AERO включает в себя сложное производство, при этом для каждого самолета требуется около 200 компонентов.…
👍3❤2
PORSCHE MISSION X ОСНАЩЕН СИДЕНЬЯМИ, НАПЕЧАТАННЫМИ НА 3D-ПРИНТЕРЕ Новая модель Porsche Mission X повышает стандарты в индивидуальном комфорте для водителя с помощью инновационных сидений, созданных с использованием 3D-печати. Уникальность этих сидений состоит в том, что они способны настраиваться по форме, чтобы идеально подходить под водителя. Этот процесс начинается со сканирования водителя с помощью 3D-сканера,…
👍3🔥2
С ДНЕМ ВОЕННО-МОРСКОГО ФЛОТА!
❤3
ТОП-МОДЕЛИ НЕДЕЛИ: НАПЕЧТАННЫЕ РАДИОУПРАВЛЯЕМЫЕ ЛОДКИ Продолжаем наш марафон 3D-печати в судостроительной отрасли сразу несколькими топ-моделями недели. В этот раз вашему вниманию представляем парочку 3D-моделей радиоуправляемых катеров (внезапно!), напечатанных на FDM 3D-принтерах. 3D-печать пластиковых радиоуправляемых моделей катеров на пульте управления становится все более популярной благодаря преимуществам F…
👍4🔥2
3D-ПЕЧАТЬ ПЕСЧАНЫХ ФОРМ ДЛЯ ЛИТЬЯ ГРЕБНЫХ ВИНТОВ ℹ️ Технология: #BJ #BinderJetting #3Dпечатьпеском ℹ️ Производитель: ООО “Аддитивные технологии” ℹ️ Материал: печать формы - песок, отливка - бронза ℹ️ Заказчик: АО "Балтийский Завод" ℹ️ Решенная проблема: быстрое и точное изготовление песчаных форм для литья 3D-печать песчаных форм для литья гребных винтов судовых двигателей из бронзы является одним из передовых…
👍4🔥1
👆🏻 Сегодня продолжим неделю судостроительной отрасли перепостом замечательного кейса по 3D-печати литейных форм для литья судовых винтов из бронзы #КейсыПодписчиков
ВМФ США УСТАНАВЛИВАЕТ МЕТАЛЛИЧЕСКИЕ 3D-ПРИНТЕРЫ НА КОРАБЛИ ДЛЯ СОКРАЩЕНИЯ ВРЕМЕНИ РЕМОНТА На американский военный корабль USS Bataan в ноябре 2022 был установлен металлический 3D-принтер для обеспечения возможности проведения ремонта на борту и 3D-печати необходимых инструментов и запчастей. Установка гибридной металлической 3D-печати Phillips Additive Hybrid, на базе DED-3D-принтера Meltio, предназначена для прове…
🔥4
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Norm_3D_Pechat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 828,504 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“3D печать норм 👍” (@Norm_3D_Pechat), 170 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Norm_3D_Pechat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.