Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

NOOITY: Whimsy Dreamscape!

@Nooity

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,730subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002095414298
TypeChannel
Username@Nooity
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Nooity

Growth

1,7301,7371,733.56 August 2026 — 1,737 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,737 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,730 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,729–1,738 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 00:411,730-7
6 Aug 2026, 14:151,737no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:341,737first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 26 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.95%
avg views ÷ 1,730 subscribers
Avg views / post
51.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held15 (26 August 202522 July 2026)
Views total51
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
50s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
583.3%
🔥116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2025 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jan 2026, 16:01 UTC748 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tikeluneVideo

PHYSICAL ASPECT THAT MADE SUNDAY MORNING DAZZLE ╱ 26’s 🥞 Phenomenon forthcoming theurgy distinguished sheer borygmous led to furthermore preposterous like the suns warm embrace in silent expanse of eternity where stars whispers their celestial poetic, flows through @Tikelune’s MINJU twists, @NOCTENITY's SUNOO and @NOOITY lighthouse in mist, guiding their journey through every warmth. 🌤

10 Nov 2025, 14:33 UTC830 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @CYEProjects

" BREAK 🕖 " Third Return Pulse returns in fractured rhythm. Meaning trembles at the edge of perception, and in the absence of light, clarity arrives. What was once bright now hums beneath the static, reborn through the silence that devours and delivers. The Pulse Flickers. The Bass Collapses. And still, he stands. The face of a storm with nowhere left to hide. “𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙙𝙞𝙙𝙣’𝙩 𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙫𝙚. 𝙄𝙩 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙣𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙬𝙝𝙞𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙧.” ⚡️

10 Nov 2025, 14:32 UTC561 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @CYEProjectsPhoto

ㅤ "𝘉𝘓𝘈𝘊𝘒𝘖𝘜𝘛" 𝘖𝘗𝘌𝘙𝘈𝘛𝘜𝘔 𝘊𝘓𝘖𝘚𝘌 𝘠𝘖𝘜𝘙 𝘌𝘠𝘌𝘚 𝘊𝘖𝘔𝘌𝘉𝘈𝘊𝘒 𝘐𝘐𝘐 ㅤ Until you break 5,6,7,8 👊🏻 ✨ — 𝘓𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘧𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘦𝘳𝘴. 🎭 — 𝘈𝘶𝘳𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴. 🏁 — 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘶𝘮 𝘣𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘴. Within the fracture of silence, resonance awakens. Neon bleeds into void; echoes rewrite their names upon the dark. Not a descent, but an ignition. What fades was never gone, only #WannaBeLikeCYE waiting to be reborn in static and steel. ⚒️ This is BLACKOUT not the fa

14 Oct 2025, 12:37 UTC236 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TwienbonPhoto

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ #___HIGH ROLLER$ & 🃏 𝖍 — 𝖘 BETTING LIKE EVERYTHING IS HIS {ㅤ♠️ ➊➎ ♥️ ... ♣️ ➊⓿ ♦️ } 𝐑✪𝐘𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐋𝐀𝐒𝐒 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐊𝐄 Just the spin, the shuffle, the deal. The casino breathes out, already knows the winner. The Ace never cheated before, but desperation had eroded all principles. Pull his last chip, red as a warning sign, and pushes it forward anyway. ㅤ(ㅤㅤMASTER

14 Oct 2025, 12:37 UTC462 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Twienbon

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ · · • • • 🜊 • • • · · 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐓𝐀𝐁𝐋𝐄 𝐇𝐀𝐒 𝐁𝐄𝐄𝐍 𝐒𝐄𝐓, 𝐅𝐎𝐑𝐌 𝐀 𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐅𝐄𝐂𝐓— 𝐂𝐈𝐑𝐂𝐋𝐄, 𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐃𝐘 𝐓𝐎 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐑𝐓 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐆𝐀𝐌𝐁𝐋𝐄 ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ Dealer's hands move like ceremony, cards falling like communion wafers—the red and black hues glistened under the deficient spotlights. Spread fairly, perhaps. Their expression turn into po

12 Oct 2025, 07:03 UTC339 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ #HOMEY ft @TWIBFESS. Home was the first poem that bore-in-mind, chiseled within the most serene yet heartwarming cavities of our memory. Allegorized to a ship that wabbled and finally found a harbor to stop, we finally meet you, @Nooity. None amount of storms can shatter our wholehearted desire for staying. Thence, we intend to stay whilst carving tales as part of each breath we will breathe hereafter and beyond.

2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Nooity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 264,540 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NOOITY: Whimsy Dreamscape!” (@Nooity), 1,730 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nooity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.