Video, posted without a caption
Signed PrajjuS

Channel
@NoobProjects
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
43subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001669223243 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NoobProjects |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 December 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NoobProjects |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 43 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 43 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 31 December 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
15 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 4 | 26.7% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 20.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2022 to 26 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
Signed PrajjuS
Maaaaaaan Old days were bess
🌚1
Signed PrajjuS
Sticker, posted without a caption
😁1
Signed PrajjuS
Happy New Year 🎊
Signed PrajjuS
Halooooo After sooo many 69+ days XD Made something that all custom rom communities can make use of! Introducing CustomRomBot: A fully customizable modular telegram bot designed to help in Custom Rom Support Groups for getting info about their Officially Supported Devices. An example of this can be seen in Project-Elixir Support group: @projectelixir_bot Feel free to spam this to the custom rom communities who ne…
Signed PrajjuS
A14 Project Elixir Booted on vince Thanks to • Joker_V2_0 and anandhan07x for helping • Excalibur_ATx and Musical_Prithwi for testing
❤2🔥2
Signed PrajjuS
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
🫡3🔥2🥰1
Signed PrajjuS
Project Elixir 3.3 build if you are unable to download it from the official download link
Signed PrajjuS
Also the abstract template we submitted for hackathon
Signed PrajjuS
Umm well I typed it and it is BIG ASFF lol So I'll just make my API public for now and ya commit msgs are fucked and are gay asf I'll rebase it soon so till then adjust lmao API Source: https://github.com/PrajjuS/HealthBridgeAPI API URL: https://health-bridge-api.vercel.app/ Also docs are not there so for docs Go here: https://health-bridge-api.vercel.app/docs
😎1
Signed PrajjuS
Well here's my update after so many days Currently exams are going on so RIP elixir updates sorry for that XD Only one exam is remaining so I'll probably release May's update And another thing is that I attended my first even hackathon in my college held by a programming club. So I'll better write a big asf message for that in couple of mins
Signed PrajjuS
Ummm after sooon many days here's my update Even though I hate web development I found interest in it after watching some Django projects XD Soo I thought of making a website using Django But since I'm still a beginner, before Django I thought of first learning FastAPI and Flask cuz it will be easy when I start to learn Django So I made a simple noob Web API Project using Python FastAPI Magisk-Web-API: A simple We…
Signed PrajjuS
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @NoobProjects. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 965,192 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Noob Projects” (@NoobProjects), 43 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NoobProjects.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.