Posted without readable text

Channel
نقطـــہ کـور
@Noghteeh_koor
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,317subscribers
-57 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002189132639 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Noghteeh_koor |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Noghteeh_koor |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
@Noghteeh_koor was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
held 17 August 2026 – 17 August 2026
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 2,317 | -9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 2,326 | -7 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 2,333 | -13 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 2,346 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 2,347 | no change |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:47 | 2,347 | -18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 2,365 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 2,370 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 2,373 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 2,374 | first reading |
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 7 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.34%
- avg views ÷ 2,317 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 31.0
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 6.45%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (7 October 2024 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 93 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 23:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 20s
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
104 reactions across 21 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 35 | 33.7% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 32.7% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 11.5% | |
| 👌 | 11 | 10.6% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 3.85% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 3.85% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.88% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.962% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 7 October 2024 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
بله هم نقطه ای ها جایی در تاریخ بود که میگفتن زنها باید ظریف باشند لطیف باشند زیبا باشند آروم صحبت کنند و میگفتند زن فقط برای عشق زاده شده... و زنان زیادی جنگیدند از شر این باور ها رهایی پیدا کنند اما امروز در قالبی به عنوان انرژی زنانه و سیاست زنانه و خیلی چیز های دیگه این موارد به صورت زیر پوستی در حال بازگشت.. حالا میپرسی پس انرژی زنانه چیه واقعا؟ بیا پست بعدی تا بهت بگم. @Noghteeh_koor
❤2
Signed nastaran
درود اهالی نقطه کور🪐✨ اولین نقطه کوری که قراره باهم مورد بررسی قرارش بدیم انرژی زنانه است! موضوع وایرال شده این روزای فضای مجازی.. انرژی زنانه در فضای مجازی میگه: 🔺همیشه ظریف باش، آروم بخند، آروم راه برو، فلان کار کن تا مردا جذبت بشن... با این حرفا یاد چیزی نمیوفتین؟! فضای مجازی در حال تکرار تاریخ برای زنان.. برای اینکه بیشتر متوجه حرفام بشی ویدئو پایین ببین👇
❤2
Signed nastaran
نقطـــہ کـور pinned «درود بر اهالی تاریکی🌒 یه معرفی داشته باشیم از چنل:) چیزی که نمیبینی، لزوماً وجود نداره؟ یا شاید فقط… نمیخوای ببینیش؟ تو زندگی های همگیمون چیزایی هست که نمیبینیم، نه چون جلوی چشممون نیستن؛ چون ذهنمون یاد گرفته از کنارشون رد بشه. باورهایی که هیچوقت دربارهشون…»
درود بر اهالی تاریکی🌒 یه معرفی داشته باشیم از چنل:) چیزی که نمیبینی، لزوماً وجود نداره؟ یا شاید فقط… نمیخوای ببینیش؟ تو زندگی های همگیمون چیزایی هست که نمیبینیم، نه چون جلوی چشممون نیستن؛ چون ذهنمون یاد گرفته از کنارشون رد بشه. باورهایی که هیچوقت دربارهشون سؤال نکردیم. رفتارهایی که فکر میکنیم طبیعین. حرفهایی که همه تکرار میکنن و ما هم پذیرفتیم. نقطه کور جاییه برای مکث کردن، سؤال پرسیدن و دوباره نگاه کردن…
❤1🔥1
Signed nastaran
✨قشنگ نیست؟ همون خدایی که تموم دنیا و کهکشان هارو خلق کرده، به این فکر کرده که دنیا به یکی مثل تو نیاز داره... ✨@nastarankeyhan2024
❤11👍5👌2
Signed 𝑺𝒉𝒊𝒗𝒂~
✨01:01 ✨@nastarankeyhan2024
❤1
Signed 𝑺𝒉𝒊𝒗𝒂~
. میدونی راز انیشتین واسه موفقیت چی بود؟ بیا از زبون خودش بشنویم. موفقیتهایی که نصیب افراد صبور میشود، همانهایی هستند که توسط افراد عجول رها شده اند! ✍آلبرت انیشتین @nastarankeyhan2024
👌6👍1
Signed nastaran
✨00:00 ✨@nastarankeyhan2024
❤2
Signed 𝑺𝒉𝒊𝒗𝒂~
واسه میز گرد امشب بریم سراغ جناب سعدی: که دست ظلم نماند چنین که هست دراز. @nastarankeyhan2024
❤6
Signed nastaran
🔻بیا چندتا نکته واسه دیت اول بهت بگم: سلاح پنهانی تو سکوت توئه! بزار حرفاشو بزنه و فکر کنه تو خیلی شیرین و ارومی در صورتی که تو داری اطلاعات جنع اوری میکنی و تحلیل میکنی. -به زبان بدنش توجه کن(از زبان بدن پسرا میشه خیلی چیزا فهمید مث حسش اینکه از شما خوشش امده یا نه اینکه شمارو واسه بازی میخواد یا رابطه واقعی سعی کنید زبان بدن یاد بگیرید..) -توجه کنید ببینید تفریح مورد علاقش چیه؟ -هر چی کمتر حرف بزنی اون بیشتر همه چ…
👏2🔥1
Signed nastaran
قانون پنجم، از 48 قانون قدرت: 🔸 اهمیت حفظ شهرت. از آن با جانتان محافظت کنید. شهرت سنگ بنای قدرت است. فقط از طریق شهرت می توانید مرعوب کنید و پیروز شوید. به محض لغزش، شما آسیب پذیر شده و از هر طرف مورد حمله قرار خواهید گرفت. اعتبار خود را مستحکم کنید. برای ایجاد شهرت با کیفیت فوق العاده، هر چیزی که باشد، تلاش کنید. کارهای زیادی توسط شهرت شما انجام میشود. 📚48 قانون قدرت @nastarankeyhan2024
👍4👏1💯1
Signed nastaran
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @Noghteeh_koor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Noghteeh_koor named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 17 posts, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Faded_Person · 60,042
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 August 2026
@musicnaightlight · 94,749
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
@TimeFarmReminder · 33,677
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 3 September 2026
@Timefarmire · 55,027
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 23 August 2026
@AirdropM_ir · 57,606
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 August 2026
@CryptoNewsIrran · 69,018
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 20 August 2026
@ShearZii · 50,013
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 25 August 2026
@TimeIrran · 86,936
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نقطـــہ کـور” (@Noghteeh_koor), 2,317 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Noghteeh_koor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.