https://www.sat24.com/it-it/continent/eu

Channel
Nogeoingegneria
@NogeoingegneriaNews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,907subscribers
+89 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001443758287 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NogeoingegneriaNews |
| Created | 6 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NogeoingegneriaNews |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 7,907 | -7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 7,914 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 7,917 | +47 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 7,870 | +11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 7,859 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 7,855 | +9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 7,846 | +10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 7,836 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 7,830 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 7,826 | +6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 7,820 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 7,821 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:50 | 7,817 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 7,818 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 7,818 | first reading |
Engagement
135 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.0%
- avg views ÷ 7,907 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 872
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 23
- of 135 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 135 (2 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,062 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 42s
- Average length
- 51s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Il disastro della Toscana laboratorio del Green: il caso Ribolla e il bluff dell'AgriFotovoltaico a terra La Maremma Sgretolata dalle Speculazioni "verdi" e dal cortocircuito della Politica. https://comedonchisciotte.org/il-caso-ribolla-e-il-bluff-del-fotovoltaico-a-terra-la-maremma-sgretolata-dalle-speculazioni-e-dal-cortocircuito-della-politica/
Una questione che merita di essere inclusa nelle indagini. https://www.nogeoingegneria.com/timeline/progetti/ghiacciai-neri-in-tutto-il-mondo-il-risultato-dellinquinamento-atmosferico-o-di-un-rilascio-deliberato-di-polvere-di-carbonio/
UN’ANALISI APPROFONDITA DEI FATTORI SCATENANTI DI TUTTI GLI EVENTI ‘GLOF’ VERIFICATISI DALL’ ANNO 1935 NELL’ HIMALAYA Tra i titoli dedicati alla catastrofe avvenuta in Nepal, ho trovato particolarmente di cattivo gusto quello del Manifesto: “Si chiama Glof la pistola climatica puntata sui nepalesi. Ed è già carica”. Nell’articolo non viene fatto alcun accenno al fatto che il fenomeno denominato “Glof” – acronimo d…
https://www.meteolive.it/news/prima-pagina/cieli-pieni-di-sabbia-tantissima-polvere-al-sud/
Cielo pieno di sabbia
Qualcuno osa a dire: Dietro c'è una strategia https://www.tarantotoday.it/attualita/taranto-incendi-ginosa-parisi-strategia-procura-indaghi-27-08-2026.html
Ieri 26 agosto 2026 un evento di proporzioni colossali ha scosso le vette al confine tra Nepal e Cina, innescando una sequenza di distruzione che ha tratto in inganno persino le reti di monitoraggio internazionali. In un approfondimento pubblicato sul blog INGVterremoti, gli esperti spiegano che “un enorme blocco di ghiaccio e roccia si è staccato da un ghiacciaio al confine tra Nepal e Cina“, precipitando a valle p…
Da noi la difterite, negli USA il morbillo: Morti “associate al morbillo” in Pennsylvania scatenano il blitz dei media – ma i funzionari non rilasciano dettagli I funzionari sanitari della Pennsylvania hanno annunciato due decessi “associati al morbillo” in individui non vaccinati nella contea di Lancaster, innescando una cascata di notizie dei media che accusano il calo dei tassi di vaccinazione. I funzionari hann…
ZELENSKY CONFERISCE A ELON MUSK L’ORDINE DELLE LIBERTÀ Al momento non risultano dichiarazioni pubbliche o commenti diretti da parte di Elon Musk (né sul suo profilo X né tramite canali ufficiali) in risposta alla concessione dell’Ordine della Libertà da parte di Volodymyr Zelenskyy. La tecnologia di Musk mantiene in vita la guerra in Ucraina Elon Musk critica regolarmente la guerra in Ucraina definendola un insensa…
CINA: 50.000 LAVORATORI PER “STRIZZARE” LA PIOGGIA DAL CIELO – CRESCE LO SCETTICISMO La Cina ha costruito il più grande programma al mondo di modifica del tempo atmosferico, impiegando 50.000 lavoratori, migliaia di lanciarazzi specializzati e imponenti flotte di aerei militari e droni ad alta quota. Tuttavia, gli scienziati dell’atmosfera hanno rapidamente espresso profonda scetticismo, chiedendosi se le correnti d…
Un gigantesco pennacchio sottomarino si trasforma in una “strada” di nuvole vorticose nel Mar Cinese Orientale — La Terra vista dallo spazio Una recente foto satellitare ha immortalato questa serie di nuvole modellate dai vortici di von Kármán, Un video mostra anche altri strani avvistamenti https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/weather/giant-underwater-plume-blasts-into-swirling-cloud-street-in-the-east-china-…
Showing the 12 most recent of 135 posts we hold for @NogeoingegneriaNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@vvincvvv · 8,99414 postsGuerrieri per la libertà
@guerrieriperlaliberta · 45,6816 postsNo Green Pass Palermo
@nogreenpasspalermo1 · 2342 postsV_V
@vvvvvinc · 17,2472 postsGianpiero
@GianpieroCelano1970 · 701 postPaolo Bellavite
@PaoloBellavite · 31,4301 postLeopoldo Salmaso || No "vaccini" OGMM
@leopoldosalmaso · 8,1431 postSara Cunial
@saracunial · 18,4021 postsymbõlism will be their döwnfall
@symbolismwillbetheirdownfall · 161 postVITA Comunità sociale e politica
@votalavita · 9,1881 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@NogeoingegneriaNews named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 19 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@canaleFAHRENHEIT912 · 22,155
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 September 2026
@marcellopamio · 70,003
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
@consenso_disinformato · 54,612
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026
@avvocati_liberi · 21,322
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
@httpR2aVkMTA0 · 29,734
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 8 September 2026
@corvelva1993 · 37,257
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
@michelegiovagnoli · 37,418
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
@renateholzeisen · 33,790
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
@economiciscenari · 29,755
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
@PaoloBellavite · 31,430
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
@evncov · 53,122
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
@Franco_Fracassi · 44,113
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nogeoingegneria” (@NogeoingegneriaNews), 7,907 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NogeoingegneriaNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.