Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مشروع هيئة مكافحة الإشاعات

Channel

مشروع هيئة مكافحة الإشاعات

@NoRumors

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,116subscribers

-123 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001007445977
TypeChannel
Username@NoRumors
Descriptionقناة مشروع هيئة مكافحة الإشاعات www.NoRumors.net
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/NoRumors

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,11614,24214,1795 August 2026 — 14,239 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,241 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,242 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,241 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,242 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,235 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,231 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,230 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,224 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,217 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,212 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,210 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,203 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,204 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,199 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,195 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,189 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,187 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,188 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,187 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,181 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,182 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,180 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,173 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,169 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,164 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,154 subscribers9 September 2026 — 14,146 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,155 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,147 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,155 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,159 subscribers26 September 2026 — 14,154 subscribers4 October 2026 — 14,130 subscribers9 October 2026 — 14,139 subscribers13 October 2026 — 14,143 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,149 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,145 subscribers17 October 2026 — 14,153 subscribers18 October 2026 — 14,157 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,156 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,155 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,152 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,147 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,151 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,153 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,158 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,160 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,157 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,155 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,154 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,144 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,143 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,146 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,136 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,127 subscribers8 November 2026 — 14,120 subscribers11 November 2026 — 14,116 subscribers5 August 202611 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 97 days, net -123. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,097–14,261 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 00:1714,116-4
8 Nov 2026, 01:0714,120-7
6 Nov 2026, 20:3114,127-9
5 Nov 2026, 19:5814,136-10
4 Nov 2026, 17:5714,146+3
3 Nov 2026, 20:0714,143-1
2 Nov 2026, 22:2614,144-10
1 Nov 2026, 23:3114,154-1
31 Oct 2026, 21:1014,155-2
30 Oct 2026, 23:1814,157-3
29 Oct 2026, 22:5514,160+2
26 Oct 2026, 22:3814,158+5
25 Oct 2026, 20:1914,153+2
23 Oct 2026, 20:3714,151+4
22 Oct 2026, 22:2014,147-5
21 Oct 2026, 18:4014,152-3
20 Oct 2026, 11:0014,155-1
19 Oct 2026, 13:1614,156-1
18 Oct 2026, 12:3814,157+4
17 Oct 2026, 13:2014,153first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.3%
avg views ÷ 14,116 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,440
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
21
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held52 (13 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total51,170
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 07:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,390
Videos
≈165
Links
≈333

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
19m 46s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (38.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

‏رُصد خلال أكتوبر الماضي تداول 2,692 إشاعة استهدفت المملكة، نُسبت 2,170 منها إلى حسابات وهمية تابعة للحوثي، إلى جانب حملات تضليل انطلقت من حسابات من دول عربية مجاورة استهدفت التأثير في الرأي العام. ‏ويوثق تقرير ⁧ #هيئة_مكافحة_الإشاعات ⁩ المختصر، أبرز 5 إشاعات وحقيقتها ومصدرها الأصلي وتاريخها وقوة انتشارها. ⁧ #تحقق_لوطنك ⁩

8 Nov 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

‏صورة مولّدة بالذكاء الاصطناعي للأمير تركي بن طلال، تروّج لها حسابات حوثية على أنها توثّق ظهوره حديثًا في مطار الملك خالد بالرياض. https://x.com/no_rumors/status/2119027021405962476?a=90A6zNLOhwxaPjrrwnY&s=46

31 Oct 2026, 15:48 UTC≈2,680 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

اطمئن؛ لا صحة للتحذير المتداول عن اختراق الهواتف عبر صور "صباح الخير" و "جمعة مباركة". التحذير إشاعة موسمية يُعاد تدويرها كل عام.

29 Oct 2026, 19:29 UTC≈2,870 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

الصورة المتداولة عبر حسابات حوثية، والمنسوب فيها تصريحٌ للرئيس الأمريكي دونالد ترامب بشأن تراجع قدرات المملكة بسبب الحوثي، مفبركة باستخدام الذكاء الاصطناعي، بهدف الترويج لانتصارات مزعومة لا تستند إلى وقائع. https://x.com/No_Rumors/status/2115888664286732797?a=ijLwPEe0csM_jhMYmL4&s=20

27 Oct 2026, 20:34 UTC≈2,990 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

‏لا صحة لما تروّجه حسابات حوثية عن استهداف وزارة الدفاع السعودية؛ فالصورة المتداولة ليست حقيقية، وبحسب نتائج فحصها باستخدام أداة «SynthID» للكشف عن المحتوى المولّد بالذكاء الاصطناعي، تبيّن أنها صورة مفبركة.

26 Oct 2026, 17:57 UTC≈2,910 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

لا صحة لما تتداوله حسابات حوثية لمقطع يُزعم أنه يُظهر وفدًا سعوديًا يقبّل يد الرئيس الإيراني مسعود بزشكيان؛ إذ جرى التلاعب بالمشاهد كالعادة باستخدام الذكاء الاصطناعي "Google Gemini" في إنتاجها. https://x.com/No_Rumors/status/2114777410860101849?s=20

22 Oct 2026, 18:32 UTC≈3,550 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

حرائق في روسيا تُروَّج على أنها في الرياض؛ حسابات حوثية تنسب مشاهد من ستافروبول إلى محيط وزارة الدفاع بينما تعود لضربات أوكرانية على منشآت نفطية في 19 يوليو 2026، ولا صلة لها بالمملكة. https://x.com/no_rumors/status/2113337267649450347?s=46&t=qpIxJrKcayqVVYnZttO1Qg

22 Oct 2026, 16:18 UTC≈2,770 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

‏لا صحة للفيديو المتداول على أنه يوثق هجمات حوثية على الرياض؛ إذ يعود إلى انفجارات وتصاعد للدخان في محيط مطار دبي في 1 مارس 2026، ولا يوثق أحداثًا في الرياض. https://x.com/no_rumors/status/2113299352340865394?s=46&t=qpIxJrKcayqVVYnZttO1Qg

22 Oct 2026, 16:11 UTC≈2,440 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

‏فيديو آخر كاذب نشرته حسابات الحوثي يوثق دخانًا قرب وزارة الدفاع بالرياض؛ إذ يعود الفيديو الحقيقي إلى حريق في مصنع NATPET "ناتبت" بينبع عام 2018. ‏A video shared by Houthi accounts does not show smoke near the Ministry of Defense in Riyadh. ‏The footage shows a fire at the "Natpet" factory in Yanbu in 2018. https://x.com/no_rumors/status/2113301908425253177?s=46&t=qpIxJrKcayqVVYnZttO1Qg

22 Oct 2026, 09:03 UTC≈2,180 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

‏لا صحة لفيديو آخر تروّجه حسابات مصرية عن انتشار قوات مصرية في السعودية؛ فالمشاهد توثّق عروضًا عسكرية سعودية برية وبحرية في جدة احتفاءً باليوم الوطني الـ96، ولا علاقة لها بالجيش المصري. https://x.com/no_rumors/status/2112607491754442929?s=46&t=qpIxJrKcayqVVYnZttO1Qg

22 Oct 2026, 08:47 UTC≈2,060 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

لا صحة لما تروّجه حسابات حوثية عن احتراق طائرة في مطار الدمام؛ فالفيديو المتداول يعود إلى اشتعال طائرة إيرانية للتزوّد بالوقود من طراز «KC-747»، إثر غارة إسرائيلية استهدفت مطار مهرآباد في طهران خلال مارس 2026، ولا علاقة له بالمملكة. https://x.com/No_Rumors/status/2113190455869325803?s=20

21 Oct 2026, 15:57 UTC≈2,270 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

تروّج حسابات حوثية رواية مضللة تربط حادثة انهيار خزان مياه مؤقت في #جدة بفشل اعتراض صاروخ، بينما أوضح الدفاع المدني أن الحادث ناجم عن انهيار عرضي لخزان مؤقت وقع في 20 أكتوبر 2026، ولا يوجد ما يثبت ارتباطه بأي هجوم صاروخي. https://x.com/No_Rumors/status/2112936108229276005?s=20

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @NoRumors. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

SAUDIA | السعودية
@saudia_airlines · 20,520
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 26 September 2026
مساعد الشراري | شروحات ابل
@is7np · 26,267
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 11 September 2026
الفيصل (تقنية ، بوتات ، برمجة)
@al_fi9l · 178,965
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 21 August 2026
وزارة الداخلية السعودية
@MoiSaudiArabia · 20,552
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 September 2026
بندر الجلعود
@Bandaralgaloud · 30,881
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
ترند السعودية
@trendsaudi · 25,048
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
أخبار السعودية
@saudinews50 · 181,604
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
Falsaif فيصل السيف
@Techpills · 65,834
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 20 August 2026
افكار مدهشة
@afkaaaeear · 22,355
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 September 2026
عادل صالح | التجارة الالكترونية
@adelacademy · 88,085
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 August 2026
الراصد نيوز ™
@dream_vu · 122,243
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
سفير الضمان
@rakan_nassour · 26,855
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
فيصل صالح
@matagrcom · 24,085
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 September 2026
عالم التقنية
@techwd · 27,128
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 September 2026
مباريات اليوم
@matches_today2 · 60,816
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
طلال ٩٢
@Talal92me · 99,826
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
قناة فيزياء للجميع
@amodi333 · 19,925
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 September 2026
معلومة
@Information_2233 · 18,701
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 4 October 2026
فهد الشهراني
@fahadalshahrany · 43,054
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 28 August 2026
وظائف جدة 24 🇸🇦
@jobsjeddah24 · 160,122
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
مؤسسة الشيخ عبد العزيز بن باز الخيرية
@binbaz1420 · 32,089
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مشروع هيئة مكافحة الإشاعات” (@NoRumors), 14,116 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NoRumors.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.