Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

NoLink Bot | 群组卫士| 广告拦截 | 防链接| 反链接

@NoLinkPost

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,028subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003382384984
TypeChannel
Username@NoLinkPost
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NoLinkPost

Growth

1,0091,0281,018.57 August 2026 — 1,009 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,009 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,011 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,028 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,006–1,031 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 05:031,028+17
8 Aug 2026, 02:101,011+2
8 Aug 2026, 00:331,009no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:181,009first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 26 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.9%
avg views ÷ 1,028 subscribers
Avg views / post
307
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.397%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held17 (26 May 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,843
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
990.0%
👍110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC136 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#机器人 #能量 #能量机器人 #租能量 #能量租赁 大家在转 usdt 的时候有没有租能量的需求? 如果需求比较多的话,我们可以开发一个能量机器人。 价格肯定谈不上全网最低 主要是靠谱方便,可以保证如果转错的话可以退。 我们搞的话肯定是长期运营,主要给我们的客户提供一个方便。 其它的网络上能量机器人很多,但是很多都是骗子 或者钓鱼🎣机器人,早期低价,然后等你转错捞鱼,或者后期直接跑路 可能也就是一笔转账到有U的地址 3 trx,转账到没有U的地址 6 trx 左右吧 大家有这个需求吗?

1👍1

2 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC264 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#机器人 #电报广告拦截 #电报广告屏蔽 #广告 我们后续可能会开发一个群管机器人,首先一定是简单好用稳定响应快为特点,大家有什么想法的可以评论区留言(不过具体开始时间可能会比较久) 当然,群管机器人是免费使用的 然后,贴两个其它机器人开发商的频道发布内容 贴这个内容,是为了表示,机器人的运行和维护是有成本的 所以,为了健康可持续的发展与维护,收费是非常必要的。 大家也不希望好好用着的机器人某天突然没有反应了 或者有问题找客服也没人搭理 而这些,都是需要成本的哦 感谢大家的理解与支持💕

25 Jul 2026, 18:40 UTC356 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#电报 #广告拦截机器人 #社区动态 🎉 月活突破 60,000!感谢大家一路相伴 我们的机器人月活已经突破 6 万人了,并且用户量依然在持续快速增长! 首先,感谢大家对我们的信赖和支持 电报上最不缺的就是骗子和各种套路了 随着用户增加,服务器的压力也是与日俱增的 我们将会尽快进行架构的升级以及多服务器的升级配置,做好冗余备份服务,避免服务中断。 给大家提供更稳定、优质的服务 实现更准确、快速的广告拦截效果 如果有任何问题,欢迎随时联系客服 官方客服 👉 @ovobotkf 备用客服 👉 @ovokfbot

1

25 Jul 2026, 04:01 UTC313 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#电报 #广告拦截机器人 #广告屏蔽机器人 💡 关于群活跃度与权重的反馈 有用户向我们反馈: 使用机器人封禁广告账号后,群内的发言量有所减少,导致群活跃度降低,进而影响了群组在搜索机器人中的排名(权重)。 建议大家根据自己的实际情况,灵活调整拦截方案与设置。 ⚠️ 说明:关于封禁广告账号是否会必然影响群组排名,尚无确切结论。 @no_linking_bot 温馨提示

17 Jul 2026, 01:15 UTC462 viewsread 8 August 2026

针对同时管理多个群的群主 我们后续会上线多群续费折扣 在活动没有上线机器人自动折扣之前, 如果您有多个群需要一次性续费 可以联系客服,根据您的情况获得续费折扣

11 Jul 2026, 05:10 UTC572 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

之前有群主说: “如果广告机器人账号先发言,再改主页资料是不是就没办法了” 从逻辑上来说是可以绕过 但是,要考虑成本问题 如果广告机器人频繁这样子操作,很容易就封号了,那它自然也发不了广告了,同样达到了我们拦截广告的目的。 同时,我们在以后会重构优化检测算法,进行用户回溯,彻底避免这个逻辑上的问题。 意思就是说,这个问题以后不会是问题。 感谢大家的支持

1

5 Jul 2026, 05:16 UTC582 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#广告拦截 #功能规划 #todo 根据用户反馈,我们规划添加以下功能: 警告提醒消息里,管理员将可以自定义添加按钮,比如【联系管理员】,然后将链接指向特定的管理员。 后续可能的功能: 我们设想管理员可以指定一个操作记录频道 机器人的所有处罚记录都会推送到操作记录频道 不知道大家是否有这种需求 比如,某个用户被禁言了,就会记录到频道里,管理员后续可以去频道查看有多少被处罚的用户,以及处置这些用户

1

24 Jun 2026, 18:25 UTC577 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎁 补偿方案: 给大家带来的不便我们深感抱歉。为了表达诚意,我们已为所有付费用户发放了 1 USDT 的现金余额补偿。 余额已直接注入您的机器人账户钱包,可在下次续费或升级时直接抵扣。

1

24 Jun 2026, 17:10 UTC535 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📢 服务异常及恢复通告 北京时间 2026-06-24 22:57 至 23:49 期间,由于大量新用户同时入群触发高并发请求,导致机器人服务器短暂过载,无法正常与 Telegram 服务器通信。 目前服务已全部恢复正常。 ⚙️ 后续优化方案: 由于近期机器人用户量增速远超预期,现有架构面临较大压力。为了从根本上解决该问题,我们正在加紧设计全新的优化方案: 架构升级:彻底优化机器人底层架构,提升高并发处理能力。 容灾预案:后续将推出备用机器人及克隆机器人方案,确保主力服务异常时可秒级切换。 为了保证系统稳定性,新方案将在充分测试后上线,尽最大努力避免类似情况再次发生。 大家有任何问题,请随时联系客服或在交流群中反馈。 再次感谢大家的理解、包容与支持!🙏

2

15 Jun 2026, 08:13 UTC513 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#机器人 #功能 #规划 针对用户反馈的需求 我们后续考虑迭代(优化)以下功能: ❇️ 支持私信机器人将白名单用户删除 ❇️ 支持用户在不同的群之间同步白名单 ❇️ 修复当大量白名单无法展示时分页展示(或者多条消息展示) ❇️ 优化底层性能,提高反应速度 大家如果有什么需求可以直接找客服反馈

13 Jun 2026, 16:57 UTC491 viewsread 8 August 2026

📢 服务异常通告 北京时间 2026-06-13 23:55:32 前后,由于短时间内大量用户集中入群,机器人在检查用户主页时响应不及时,导致机器人对广告审核处理出现延迟或漏检。 目前服务已恢复正常。 随着使用群组和用户数量的持续增长,我们将对服务架构进行优化升级,以保障更快速、更稳定的响应能力。感谢大家的理解与支持 🙏

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @NoLinkPost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 597,923 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NoLink Bot | 群组卫士| 广告拦截 | 防链接| 反链接” (@NoLinkPost), 1,028 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NoLinkPost.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.