Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ниша | архитекторы и нейросети

Channel

ниша | архитекторы и нейросети

@NishA_Ai

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,695subscribers

+180 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001908080686
TypeChannel
Username@NishA_Ai
Descriptionкоманда архитекторов, которые делают архвиз, цифровые продукты и события https://nisha.team | https://nisha.app @skilove — делает nisha.app @lysovajulia — делает сообщество
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/NishA_Ai

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,5066,6956,600.56 August 2026 — 6,515 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,515 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,514 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,506 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,508 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,520 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,518 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,524 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,516 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,520 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,518 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,520 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,523 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,518 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,521 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,522 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,535 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,598 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,641 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,667 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,679 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,688 subscribers9 November 2026 — 6,692 subscribers14 November 2026 — 6,695 subscribers6 August 202614 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 100 days, net +180. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,478–6,723 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 10:546,695+3
9 Nov 2026, 01:516,692+4
5 Nov 2026, 19:086,688+9
2 Nov 2026, 14:566,679+12
30 Oct 2026, 04:086,667+26
27 Oct 2026, 03:046,641+43
24 Oct 2026, 07:556,598+63
14 Oct 2026, 22:086,535+13
11 Oct 2026, 08:006,522+1
5 Oct 2026, 01:426,521+3
17 Sept 2026, 08:166,518-5
9 Sept 2026, 12:386,523+3
3 Sept 2026, 21:366,520+2
31 Aug 2026, 21:576,518-2
29 Aug 2026, 06:486,520+4
25 Aug 2026, 23:166,516-8
23 Aug 2026, 04:496,524+6
20 Aug 2026, 02:566,518-2
16 Aug 2026, 17:586,520+12
12 Aug 2026, 20:236,508first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.8%
avg views ÷ 6,695 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,660
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held31 (25 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total19,930
Reactions total214
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
606
Videos
147
Links
413

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 22s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

339 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤14743.4%
🔥6519.2%
👍6418.9%
😢226.49%
🤔113.24%
👏102.95%
🙏102.95%
😁41.18%
🎉20.59%
👎20.59%
🥰20.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 540 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (61.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 06:26 UTC720 views20 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

➡️ нейронки разучат нас мечтать? поговорили об ии в арх. образовании во ВШЭ короткое мнение, чтобы сэкономленное время потратить на чат с нейронкой формат докладов себя в этой теме не оправдал, т.к. ни у кого пока что нет хоть сколько-то проверенных гипотез и устоявшейся позиции по теме, а описанный опыт докладчиков, локальный и фрагментарный, не складывается в общее поле обсуждения. думаем, нужны дебаты. желат…

❤11👍6🤔2🔥1

7 Nov 2026, 09:05 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 14 November 2026
Poll

эйай плюс ...

  1. скетчап26%
  2. 3d max + corona / v-ray41%
  3. rhino + grasshopper23%
  4. blender20%
  5. photoshop26%
  6. indesign / illustrator14%
  7. свой вариант в комментариях3%

The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Nov 2026, 08:39 UTC≈1,480 views11 reactionsread 14 November 2026

🔵 ии в образовании архитектора, уже завтра 5–6 ноября в Москве наши друзья Андрей Киселёв (sintez) и Юля Каптур (fragments) вместе со Школой дизайна ВШЭ, Союзом архитекторов и фондом Чернихова собрали конференцию «ии в архитектурном образовании». она про то, чему и как теперь учить архитекторов, если ИИ есть у каждого студента (и почти у каждого преподавателя) 5 ноября там будем и мы: 10:00 — круглый стол «ИИ и …

❤6👍4🔥1

1 Nov 2026, 09:37 UTC≈1,600 views8 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

📍 мясные прокси, куклод и ко в прошлый раз вы прислали: ...задипсичить, нейроделы, нейробои, иишница, бананисты, ИИкать, навайбкожено принесли ещё: мясной прокси, куклод и нейрогемблинг ➡️ угадаете, что это такое, или знаете еще? пишите в чат ваша ниша

😁4❤3👍1

29 Oct 2026, 13:00 UTC≈2,020 views30 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

✨ "архикад, смоделируй храм! ...а еще пересчитай площади и разложи плитку" — всё это увидели на эфире: — Богдан Стрелецкий отдал ChatGPT пересчитать площади 470 помещений, а потом собрал бесплатный ArchiHelper, чтобы архитекторы могли подключать нейронку к архикаду без разборок с python — Александр Гребенников вместе с GPT смоделировал церковь, не нарисовав руками ни одной стены, — только писал и обводил эскизы н…

❤15👍9🔥4🙏2

28 Oct 2026, 11:03 UTC≈1,670 views12 reactionsread 14 November 2026

ии × архикад: материалы после эфира основной пост по итогам — тут! — транскрипт для вашей нейронки — презентация Юрия Алемовского 🔼 ссылка на запись youtube | vk обсуждение эфира — в комментариях к посту ваша ниша

❤9👍2🔥1

27 Oct 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,710 views9 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

⭐️ сколько стоит обмерный план с ии в архикаде? наткнулись на видео, где автор чертит план с codex по фото первый вариант не получился: несущая стена превратилась в перегородку, а для итога понадобилось четыре круга правок ➡️ итого: полтора часа и $4, почти недельный лимит ...но площади в итоге так и не сошлись — думаем, что пока перепроверять план за нейронкой дольше, чем делать с нуля, да и пропустить ошибку в …

❤5🤔2👍1👏1

25 Oct 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,750 views23 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

⭐️ как подключить сlaude к revit? на эфире обсудили, что делать: 🔵найдите и откройте PowerShell 🔵скопируйте из урока три строки и поместите в консоль 🔵перезапустите ревит и нажмите рыжую кнопку Revit MCP Switch 🔵первым сообщением дайте нейронке нулевой промпт из урока, иначе без бим-а 🔼 запись встречи на youtube | вконтакте — инструкция по подключению, v23-27 — канал "Новый архитектор" — бесплатные базы знаний по …

👍8🔥6❤4🙏4👏1

24 Oct 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,790 views25 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

✨ эйай в Revit без магии разобрались: 🔵как подключить Claude к Revit и что для этого нужно 🔵 почему сейчас именно Revit и что делать тем, кто в Archicad 🔵нулевой промпт: правила, без которых ИИ лепит пустую геометрию 🔵живой показ урока на модели, вместе с ошибками и тем, как их править 🔵 что дальше с уроками на сайте 🔼 запись на youtube | вконтакте инструкция по подключению ваша ниша

🔥11❤9👍4🙏1

21 Oct 2026, 05:44 UTC≈2,130 views28 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

📍четыре бесплатных базы знаний про эйай обсуждали, что будет с архвизом — вот несколько открытых образовательных ресурсов, чтобы найти еще аргументы 🔵 digitalFUTURES, eng бесплатная онлайн-академия про архитектуру и вычислительный дизайн, сейчас идёт свежий цикл лекций, например о том, появятся ли полноценные ии-бюро 🔵NXT BLD 2026, eng лондонская конференция, где бюро и разработчики показывают, как ии работает в р…

❤17👍6🔥5

19 Oct 2026, 04:16 UTC≈1,940 viewsread 14 November 2026
Poll

что будет с архвизом?

  1. всё изменится к лучшему50%
  2. всё изменится к худшему32%
  3. ничего не изменится18%
  4. обсужу в комментариях5%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @NishA_Ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@NishA_Ai edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
4 November 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @NishA_Ai as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
12 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
44 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Nov 2026, 09:05 UTCAnonymous Poll192 voters

эйай плюс ...

  1. скетчап26%
  2. 3d max + corona / v-ray41%
  3. rhino + grasshopper23%
  4. blender20%
  5. photoshop26%
  6. indesign / illustrator14%
  7. свой вариант в комментариях3%

The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Oct 2026, 04:16 UTCAnonymous Poll276 voters

что будет с архвизом?

  1. всё изменится к лучшему50%
  2. всё изменится к худшему32%
  3. ничего не изменится18%
  4. обсужу в комментариях5%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

3D GRIPINSKY | INFO
@gripinsky · 18,713
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 October 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ниша | архитекторы и нейросети” (@NishA_Ai), 6,695 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NishA_Ai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.