Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Niffera‘s calls

Channel

Niffera‘s calls

@NifferasCalls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,854subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001915762297
TypeChannel
Username@NifferasCalls
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NifferasCalls

Growth

1,8541,8561,8557 August 2026 — 1,856 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,855 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,854 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,854–1,856 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 02:441,854-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:321,855-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:461,856first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

101 reactions across 13 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
101100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2024 to 25 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2,071
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 20 we hold a reading for · 65%
Most on one post
955
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @NifferasCalls. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 November 2024 to 25 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Apr 2026, 22:35 UTC≈1,720 views0 reactions220 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

We are so back😋 ETH SZN We need to let the market cool down so that I can give you a few calls

25 Apr 2026, 09:48 UTC≈2,380 views0 reactions797 Starsread 7 August 2026

Restart! Let’s gamble again All calls in this channel are not financial recommendations! The NFT market recently updated the ATL due to a burst bubble called 'credit NFTs'. This doesn't mean that NFTs are dead or that the sector is doomed. It's just that if your lung burst in your body, you would also take a long time to recover. It's impossible to grow infinitely.

13 Sept 2025, 10:31 UTC≈5,690 views0 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

It’s literally a game token! Don’t be morons and think about how much money will arrive in the asset soon lol Luv you🤍 https://x.com/pixldao/status/1966320709501857991?s=46

12 Sept 2025, 14:46 UTC≈5,000 views4 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bro, do you still not believe in this chart?

4

28 Aug 2025, 17:39 UTC≈4,710 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

$PIXL 9kk good entry too btw 0x427A03Fb96D9A94A6727fbcfbBA143444090dd64 https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x31c0bA10e4e12BE6cDCEb612E5E829d977532bfC NFA DYOR I’m hold this shit until zero 😊

4

28 Aug 2025, 17:37 UTC≈3,830 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @exitliquidityPhoto

arf? 😡

4

19 Jun 2025, 14:00 UTC≈5,880 views27 reactions955 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#nfa | Sappy Seals Entry: 0.3 Best entry: 0.25 Exit: in Q3-4 Announcements: idk, I just have info from DAO NfaDYOR

27

18 Jun 2025, 10:52 UTC≈5,390 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Oh, guys! I forgot that I didn’t write here about the OpenSea farming!!! So that’s my opinion - the opensea are going to fuck off. Dirty office of faggots, return the OpenSea 1.0 clowns 😇

10

18 Jun 2025, 08:31 UTC≈4,520 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

“If u buy just hold” 0.3-> 0.55 If u really buy it after mint (0.2-0.3) sell it rn. It will be difficult to eat this wall 💕 Thx everyone for your trust!

9

17 Jun 2025, 08:39 UTC≈3,520 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I gave these calls at the beginning of the year in my Russian-language diary of trades, which is open for a while and tomorrow will be closed to the masses again 😊 https://t.me/nifferaeth/105 https://t.me/nifferaeth/120 We knew in advance about the exact date of TGE abs.

10

17 Jun 2025, 08:35 UTC≈2,860 views9 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

#call | LP entry: 0.8 best entry: 0.6 exit: in q4 announcements: TGE abs link: NFADYOR

9

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NifferasCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 911,244 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Niffera‘s calls” (@NifferasCalls), 1,854 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NifferasCalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.