Channel
@Nextstep_results
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002694835233 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nextstep_results |
| Created | 29 March 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nextstep_results |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 10 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 10 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 29 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
31 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 11 | 35.5% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 32.3% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 16.1% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2025 to 4 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Jo'rabek Abdunazarov – SAT 1470 Jo'rabek is one of the most passionate students I’ve ever taught. He was truly thirsty for knowledge and always ready to put in whatever effort was needed. His genuine hard work paid off, and he scored an impressive 1470 on his very first attempt—something many people underestimate. Being just in 10th grade with such big ambitions, his future looks very bright. May Allah grant him succ…
Muhammadyusuf Sharipov - 1500 He is the proof that students who come late every lesson can achieve scores as impressive as 1500. Muhammadyusuf is already a student of university, but he did not give up on his dream of studying abroad. His willpower was so strong, so he attended our offline 3-month program which is based in Namangan from Andijan everyday. Before attending our course, he was already equiped with brilli…
🔥2🤩2❤1
Abrorbek Maxamadjonov - 760 math Abrorbek completed our october "math 750+" program and scored outstanding 760 from math. Even though he is just 10th grade, he was a little disappointed from his result. He was confident to ace 800. Inshaa Allah he will avenge and cook the SAT in march. A journey of a thousand miles begins with one step. @Nextstep_academy
❤1
Jahongir Ibrohimov – 1️⃣5️⃣5️⃣0️⃣ Jahongir, another genius from Bukhara, had already scored 1470 in the June exam before coming to me for an individual course. He’s funny, well-mannered, and mature beyond his age—a true pleasure to teach. We focused mainly on his weak areas, especially reading comprehension, and his hard work paid off with a stunning 1550. And the most impressive part? He’s only in 10th grade. Absolu…
🔥2
Marjona Karimova – 1️⃣4️⃣4️⃣0️⃣ Marjona completed our 3-month full SAT program, showing great organization and discipline throughout. Even though she missed some lessons due to health issues, she still managed to score an impressive 1440 on her very first attempt. Now, she has set her sights on conquering 1500+ in the October exam. In shaa Allah, we’ll update her story soon—with an even bigger success! Admission to …
Akram Shodmonov – SAT 1️⃣4️⃣7️⃣0️⃣ Akram joined our 1-month Math 750+ program after scoring 660 in Math on the June exam. With his hard work and discipline, he pushed himself to a much higher level and achieved an impressive 1470 overall and 790 math. We wish him nothing but the best in his future endeavors—may Allah grant him success in every step ahead. A journey of a thousand miles begins with one step. @Nextstep…
❤1
Nurmuxammad Yusupov – SAT 1450 Nurmuxammad studied in a special small group with two of his friends. Despite missing a few lessons, he consistently showed his potential—crossing 1500 in his final practice tests. However, Allah chose 1450 as the best for him, and he and his family are grateful and happy with the result. With his talent and mindset, there’s no limit to what he can achieve, in shaa Allah!
❤3🔥2👍1
Nilufar To'raboyeva – SAT 1480 Nilufar’s journey was all about dedication. After scoring 1370 in the December exam following my standard group, she joined the intensive group with a clear goal—to push her score higher. Through consistent effort and focus, she reached an impressive 1480. Her hard work truly paid off. May Allah guide her to even greater success!
❤1👍1🔥1
Alisher Sobirov – SAT 1510 Alisher joined my intensive group after taking the SAT three times. His last score was already an impressive 1440, but he was determined to break the 1500 barrier. With his hard work and just a bit of guidance, he cracked 1510. Honestly, with his dedication, I believe he could’ve achieved this even through self-study. May Allah bless his future endeavors—he’s got a bright path ahead!
❤1👍1🔥1
Jamshid Karimov – SAT 1480 Jamshid’s journey was nothing short of inspiring. After scoring 1320 in our standard group, he took a break to focus on IELTS—earning an impressive 7.5. When he returned to smash the SAT in the intensive group, he balanced his studies with a part-time job due to personal reasons. Despite his busy schedule, his manners and character always stood out. Teaching a student like him was an honor,…
❤1👍1🔥1
Islom Jo'rayev – SAT 1460 Islom joined our intensive math group for about 40 days, already equipped with outstanding English skills and an impressive IELTS 8.0. Beyond his academic abilities, he brought laughter and positivity to every lesson—always making the group smile. I hope our small guidance helped along the way to his 1460. May Allah bless his future—he’s got both talent and a great heart!
👍1🔥1🥰1
Sardor Abdusalomov – SAT 1480 Sardor’s journey wasn’t easy, but his determination never wavered. We worked one-on-one, but had to pause our lessons 20 days before the exam due to health issues. Despite the challenges, he scored an impressive 1480. With big goals and an even bigger heart, he has already submitted his applications to the colleges he dreams of. May Allah grant him success and open the doors to the best …
👏2❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Nextstep_results. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 198,331 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Next step academy results” (@Nextstep_results), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nextstep_results.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.