Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

داستان نیویورکر

@NewYorkFaMag

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,722subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001002113059
TypeChannel
Username@NewYorkFaMag
Created7 October 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NewYorkFaMag

Growth

1,7221,7231,722.56 August 2026 — 1,723 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,723 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,722 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,723 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,722 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,722–1,723 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:051,722-1
10 Aug 2026, 07:481,723+1
7 Aug 2026, 01:451,722-1
6 Aug 2026, 07:051,723no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:061,723first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 9 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.3%
avg views ÷ 1,722 subscribers
Avg views / post
384
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held16 (9 September 202529 July 2026)
Views total1,152
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC323 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Hydration break! 🖋 #کارتون نیویورکر @NewYorkFaMag

26 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC431 viewsread 7 August 2026

#معرفی_کتاب | نیویورکر ◾️بازبینی ◾️الین کاستیلو انتشارات Viking «بازبینی» رمانی است از «اِلین کاستیلو» که توسط انتشارات وایکینگ منتشر شده است. در این رمانِ گزنده، زن جوان و سرسختی به نام گرلی، به‌عنوان بازبین محتوای یک پلتفرم واقعیت مجازی به اسم «پلی‌گراند» کار می‌کند؛ پلتفرمی که هم یک سرگرمی شبیه به بازی است و هم ابزاری درمانی. تصور مخترع پلتفرم این بوده که می‌توان با تجویز واقعیت‌های جایگزین، به افراد مبتلا به

8 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC≈1,610 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🖋 #کارتون نیویورکر @NewYorkFaMag

24 Dec 2025, 14:06 UTC≈1,490 viewsread 7 August 2026

#معرفی_کتاب | نیویورکر ◾️چتر دی‌دی ◾️هوانگ جانگن ترجمه از کره‌ای به انگلیسی: ای. یاوون دو نووِلا که به‌شکلی کمرنگ از طریق هویت‌های دگرباش شخصیت‌هایشان و علاقه‌شان به یک بازار قدیمی و تقریباً متروکه‌ی لوازم الکترونیک در سئول به هم گره خورده‌اند، در پی یک فاجعه‌ی مرگبار کشتی و جنبشی برای سرنگونی یک رئیس‌جمهور فاسد شکل می‌گیرند. این کتاب نیز همچون رمان‌های پیشین هوانگ، ترسیمی لطیف و وهم‌آلود از دوستان و دلدادگان طر

6 Nov 2025, 11:30 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 7 August 2026

#معرفی_کتاب | نیویورکر ◾️آزمون شناوری ◾️لین استِگِر استرانگ انتشارات Mariner محور اصلی این رمان، چهار خواهر و برادر بزرگسال هستند. آن‌ها پس از مرگ ناگهانی مادرشان، برای رسیدگی به وسایل و دارایی‌های او به خانه‌ی دوران کودکی‌شان بازمی‌گردند. جود، دومین فرزند کوچک و راوی داستان، همه‌چیز را روایت می‌کند؛ از ماجراجویی‌های دوران کودکی گرفته تا ناامیدی‌های اخیر— از جمله دوری گزیدن خواهرش فرد از خانواده. جِن، بزرگترین فر

6 Nov 2025, 11:30 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

◾️The Float Test ◾️Lynn Steger Strong 🔻

25 Oct 2025, 15:02 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 7 August 2026

📎 تیم نیویورکفا در حال ترجمه‌ی داستان‌های برگزیده ۲۰۲۱ می‌باشد و به مرور سراغ داستان‌های ویژه‌نامه خواهد رفت.

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @NewYorkFaMag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 745,573 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“داستان نیویورکر” (@NewYorkFaMag), 1,722 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NewYorkFaMag.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.