НЬЮ ВЕЙВ ЗАКРЫЛИ
custom 54562323243351617527

Channel
@NewWave_HenryElsner
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002191646829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NewWave_HenryElsner |
| Description | Сапп: @NotHenryElsner (да, да, да, очень смешно) |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NewWave_HenryElsner |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 7 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 7 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
57 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5456232324335161752 | 22 | 38.6% | |
| custom 5357354776952582963 | 21 | 36.8% | |
| custom 5384587725762477147 | 10 | 17.5% | |
| custom 5312525488864911932 | 4 | 7.02% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2025 to 24 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
НЬЮ ВЕЙВ ЗАКРЫЛИ
custom 54562323243351617527
😦
custom 54562323243351617525
А вообще, хотите поговорить может в комментах по приколу? Может там написать можете че об этом тгк, про персонажа или о моем видении? Или о том что вы съели сегодня хз
custom 53573547769525829634custom 53125254888649119321
Доброе утро, страна! Пришла великая депрессия! Я умер! Ладно, но я канал-то оставлю, может после ЕГЭ там я захочу вернуться? Хотя, это маловероятно (но вероятность не равна нулю!) Да и честно, у меня в последнее время график плотный, не успеваю ни пизды, вот честно. У меня и егэ, и в последнее время меня так менталка съедает, что... Ладно, говорить не буду Да и ...я выгорел 🔥 Особенно в последние несколько недель я…
custom 54562323243351617522
Channel name was changed to «(Архив) Генри Элснер»
╔. :✧: .═════════ ⊹₊ ⋆ .. Гᴇнри ᴨоᴋидᴀᴇᴛ ᴄᴇᴛᴋу .. ᴛᴇᴨᴇᴩь ᴨᴇᴩᴄонᴀж ᴄʙободᴇн дᴧя зᴀяʙоᴋ! >>> @GAP_New_wave_bot ═════════ #ʟᴇᴀᴠᴇs ╝
custom 54562323243351617525
Адм (маты): блять, я до сих пор жду, когда объявят о моем уходе. Че за ебала? /безнег , как бы странно это не было. Я просто резкий очень. Ниче не имею против на самом деле
custom 54562323243351617523
Аноним: какое у вас любимое время суток? — Хороший вопрос. Наверное, мне больше всего нравится момент, когда день плавно перетекает в вечер. 🪄 Да, звучит странно, но позвольте мне объяснить: Это время, когда работа кипит, когда мысли заняты делами, и нет времени скучать. Но в то же время где-то на заднем плане уже теплится осознание, что скоро я закрою блокнот, уберу бумаги и отправлюсь домой. Впереди ждет ужин, ра…
custom 53573547769525829632custom 53845877257624771472
— И еще...Я знаю, что иногда пропадаю, и мне действительно не по себе от этого. Но вот я снова здесь и готов даже поделиться кое с чем! Я сегодня пишу статью о радио—о том, как оно изменилось за последние несколько лет.📻 (Честно, мне пришла в голову идея написать про радио благодаря Нэнси Ну и потому что мне действительно нравится техника!) Вообще, когда-то все начиналось с простых кристаллических детекторов, для ко…
custom 53125254888649119321custom 53573547769525829631custom 53845877257624771471
— Добрый день! 🌺 Первый рабочий день недели почти подошёл к концу, а я даже не заметил, как пролетело время. Увлёкся работой — бывает. Сегодняшняя тема оказалась действительно интересной, и, наверное, именно поэтому я даже не успел почувствовать привычную усталость понедельника.⭐ А у вас как дела? Надеюсь, никого не смутит мое периодическое отсутствие... Я уже говорил об этом? Простите..!
custom 53125254888649119321custom 53573547769525829631custom 53845877257624771471
Аноним: — — Какая прелесть! Он такой очаровательный, совсем маленький несмышлёныш...🐈Спасибо большое за поднятое настроение на ночь! Всё-таки у меня самые лучшие читатели — заботливые, внимательные…✨
custom 53573547769525829633
— Ой божечки, ну и память у меня… Совсем забыл поздравить с Днём книгодарения! 📚Правда, он уже прошёл… но кто сказал, что книги нельзя дарить просто так, без особого повода, да? А ещё сегодня, кажется, День одиноких… Или как он там правильно называется? День одиночек? День одиноких людей? В общем, что-то в этом духе. Или он 22 ноября празднуется, я запутался... А так...Забавный праздник, если честно. Я, конечно, к …
custom 53573547769525829632
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NewWave_HenryElsner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 162,950 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@NewWave_HenryElsner named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“(Архив) Генри Элснер” (@NewWave_HenryElsner), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NewWave_HenryElsner.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.