Channel
@NewMedicineLibrary
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
31subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001845885774 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NewMedicineLibrary |
| Description | Medical-biological topics critically examined on a scientific basis. 💡In-depth information for sustainable knowledge. 🔵Telegram🇩🇪 https://t.me/NeueMedizinBibliothek |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NewMedicineLibrary |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 31 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 31 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
40 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 37.5% | |
| 🙏 | 13 | 32.5% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 15.0% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 10.0% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2024 to 14 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
What We Lost - (Chapter 1 audio) (by Howdie Mickoski) https://youtu.be/drPIdzzMGU0 PDFs Chapters 1 & 2: https://howdiemickoski.com/book/what-we-lost R:t.me/JavRoJav/545 In:https://www.facebook.com/61109134/posts/10105462737542582 T:t.me/JavRoJav/560
❤1🔥1
What is really a mechanism that is decisive for the form and development of life, if not genetics? Bioelectricity. Michael Levin showed that bioelectric signals control which body parts grow, regenerate or are suppressed. A flatworm (planarian) can regenerate from each part into a complete worm when it is cut into pieces. By changing the electrical voltage patterns, animals have even been able to adopt new body pla…
🔥2
January 22, 2025 Graphene Oxide: The Schrödinger’s Cat of Nanomaterials https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsanm.5c00122 Extracts: The controversy surrounding the existence of “graphene oxide” as a well-defined material is explored. While the term “graphene oxide” suggests a specific and uniform structure, the reality points to a mixture of oxidized carbon materials with variability in oxygen functionalities and c…
👍1👏1
#genetics How valid are genetic sequence analyses if a sequence assigned to Pfizer (BNT162b2 plasmid) was found in a recent preprint case report in a woman after three Moderna vaccinations (because the Moderna plasmid sequence was missing in public databases)?🙃 t.me/NewMedicineLibrary
👍1
#vaccines What is the rate of accepted vaccine damage claims in international comparison? Sources: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126830 , https://www.tagesschau.de/wissen/gesundheit/impfschaeden-anerkennung-100.html t.me/NewMedicineLibrary
👍1
How did the development of mRNA technology by Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman begin? Boston University writes about this: "For her part, Karikó had been captivated by mRNA since the earliest days of her career. She left her native Hungary in 1985, when funding dried up for her lab, taking a low-level postdoctoral position at Temple University. Four years later, Karikó moved to Penn, where she would spend the next …
👍3
#Inheritance Inheritance of certain behaviours/instincts In a 2014 study, mice were conditioned to show a fear response to a certain odour (acetophenone or propanol). It was observed that this conditioned behaviour and the shock triggered not only occurred in the mice directly affected, but also in the following two generations. These results should sensitise us to the way we treat our fellow human beings. https:…
❤1🙏1
#Evolutiontheory https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2019.08.010 👉Found at ViaVetoTV t.me/NewMedicineLibrary
🙏3
A transcript version: I have been working with RNA since the 1980s, when I was a postdoc at MIT. And if you had asked me back then whether RNA could ever become a medicine, I would have thought you were crazy. Two years ago, it was very difficult to raise capital for mRNA because it was not a validated platform. I believe people were still skeptical that mRNA could actually work as a therapeutic or a vaccine. Unlik…
❤2🔥1
#genetics Is (m)RNA really what we think it is? Even before corona, almost nobody believed in the alleged mRNA mechanism of action. Excerpts from the documentary ‘mRNA - hype or hope?’ https://www.zdf.de/3sat/3sat-wissenschaftdoku/220203-sendung-wido-104.html 👉Link found at t.me/LankaVision t.me/NewMedicineLibrary
Christine Massey: The people behind Stripe are downright evil, as far as I can tell. And according to the user agreement, it can basically do whatever it wants including take $$ from your bank account and not be held accountable t.me/NewMedicineLibrary
👏1🔥1
#novirus / CPE https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0065352708604923 t.me/NewMedicineLibrary
👍1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NewMedicineLibrary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“New Medicine Library” (@NewMedicineLibrary), 31 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NewMedicineLibrary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.