Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ИИ и Безопасность производства | НейроБезопасность

Channel

ИИ и Безопасность производства | НейроБезопасность

@NeuroSafety_iTechnoPro

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

774subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002356499221
TypeChannel
Username@NeuroSafety_iTechnoPro
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/NeuroSafety_iTechnoPro

Growth

7717777747 August 2026 — 777 subscribers8 August 2026 — 777 subscribers14 August 2026 — 775 subscribers29 August 2026 — 771 subscribers8 September 2026 — 774 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 32 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 770–778 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 22:18774+3
29 Aug 2026, 18:35771-4
14 Aug 2026, 21:06775-2
8 Aug 2026, 01:48777no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:13777first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
35s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1733.3%
🔥1631.4%
611.8%
😁59.80%
🌚23.92%
💯23.92%
🤯23.92%
👏11.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 16:33 UTC188 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Красивая цифра, оставлю тут на память 🔥🔥

🔥9

8 Jul 2026, 17:58 UTC328 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

3 дня плодотворной работы. Это был мощный, насыщенный на инструменты, эмоции, механики, новшества тренинг. 3 поток, 30+ человек в офлайне, 5 тренеров. Каждый поток я удивляюсь уровню участников. Все мощнее и мощнее!

👍43🔥3

3 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC312 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍10

3 Jul 2026, 11:09 UTC303 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Прямо про меня сегодня ночью🤣🤣🤣 Кто пробовал вайб-кодить, поймет 😉

😁5

2 Jul 2026, 23:40 UTC261 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Китайцы в теме Агентов. Вот и Z.ai выпустил свою программу (Desktop) для агентов. Очень щедрые для агентов токены, каждый день обновляются, 2 топовые модели в наличии. Немного погонял их по нашим скилам для Hermesa. Достойно, работабельно, но после Claude моделей немного медленнее и сообразительнее. Напишите в комментариях, кто уже попробовал, какие ваши впечатления?

30 Jun 2026, 21:36 UTC225 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Проверил, дал задания агентам и могу продолжить пост. Когда я работаю из дома, часто это происходит именно так. Дал задание, пошел пить чай с семьей. Пришел, проверил потом через минут 30 и опять ушел) Кстати, практически у всех ИИ-агентов есть возможность дистанционно через мессенджеры или их мобильные приложения, контролировать и управлять агентами. Главное, чтобы комп был в сети. И конечно, после того, как попр

👍2

30 Jun 2026, 21:23 UTC200 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Теперь у каждого будет свой штат подчиненных. Я в прошлом году осознал, что теперь даже у школьника будут свои сотрудники (цифровые с ИИ-мозгами конечно, пока что) Да, да. Теперь каждому придется учиться руководить, ставить цели, достигать их, использовать и развивать свои управленческие навыки. На своем примере: У мне ближайшие 7 дней будет офлайн практикум в Питере и тренинг в Москве. И сейчас у меня параллель

3👍1

30 Jun 2026, 07:42 UTC165 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

AI agent и Agentic AI: одно и то же?

  1. Нет, конечно.43%
  2. Возможно48%
  3. Да, для меня все одинаково10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jun 2026, 07:40 UTC165 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Знаете отличие между ними?

  1. Да, по всем24%
  2. Да, между чат-ботом и ассистентом18%
  3. Да, все кроме Агентного ИИ71%
  4. Нет, вообще не в курсе12%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Jun 2026, 07:39 UTC151 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Встречали эти термины?

  1. Чат-бот84%
  2. ИИ-ассистент84%
  3. ИИ-агент89%
  4. Агентный ИИ47%

The shares total 304%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Jun 2026, 07:27 UTC176 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Продолжение истории или причем тут агенты. На той неделе мы собрали свой сервис "умного поиска" для наших тренингов. На все это ушло 24 часа и из них 7 часов чистого времени. Но для меня главный результат был даже не в самом сервисе. Главнее - как мы его собирали. Я специально посадил своего ассистента работать через Codex Desktop. Он раньше не работал на нем и сначала сопротивляться: «Я сам быстрее арендую се

28 Jun 2026, 18:29 UTC216 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мои наблюдения. № 1. В моем окружении часто слышу "Мне ChatGPT так посоветовал....", "Мне Qwen сказал, вот это сделать.....", "Gemini решил, что надо вот так...." , "Мы с нейронкой решили, что это..." и......? № 2: Именно в бытовых и личных задачах ИИ используется чаще и заменяет Гугл-поисковик. Напишите в комментариях, вы попадаете в эту статистику?

🌚2💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @NeuroSafety_iTechnoPro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jun 2026, 07:42 UTCAnonymous Quiz21 voters

AI agent и Agentic AI: одно и то же?

  1. Нет, конечно.43%
  2. Возможно48%
  3. Да, для меня все одинаково10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jun 2026, 07:40 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

Знаете отличие между ними?

  1. Да, по всем24%
  2. Да, между чат-ботом и ассистентом18%
  3. Да, все кроме Агентного ИИ71%
  4. Нет, вообще не в курсе12%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Jun 2026, 07:39 UTCAnonymous Poll19 voters

Встречали эти термины?

  1. Чат-бот84%
  2. ИИ-ассистент84%
  3. ИИ-агент89%
  4. Агентный ИИ47%

The shares total 304%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

25 Jun 2026, 14:14 UTCAnonymous Quiz13 voters

Вопрос к знатокам, на сколько баллов ответы экспертные?

  1. 10%
  2. 215%
  3. 315%
  4. 415%
  5. 554%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 16 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ИИ и Безопасность производства | НейроБезопасность” (@NeuroSafety_iTechnoPro), 774 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NeuroSafety_iTechnoPro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.