از این به بعد با این برنامه کتابای زبان اصلی رو میخونم :)
❤13
Signed Danial Nejadmasoom

Channel
@NeuroLab_Official
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,746subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001607734263 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NeuroLab_Official |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NeuroLab_Official |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 3,746 | -20 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 3,766 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 3,774 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 3,769 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 3,769 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (16 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,593 |
| Reactions total | 306 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
306 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 294 | 96.1% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 3.27% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.654% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 306reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
از این به بعد با این برنامه کتابای زبان اصلی رو میخونم :)
❤13
Signed Danial Nejadmasoom
مجموعه واکسن مغز یه بسته آموزشی چندرسانهایه؛ هم کتاب و نقشه راه و پلنر داره، هم محتوای صوتی و تصویری. یکی از دوستام که کتابها رو از نزدیک دیده بود گفت چرا رفرنس APA نذاشتین؟ جوابش سادهست: هزاران مقاله آکادمیک با لحن سبک آکادمیک وجود داره. ولی من به عنوان سرپرست نویسندگان گفتم از "اصل فاینمن" پیروی کنن؛ یعنی جوری بنویسن انگار دارن برای مادربزرگشون توضیح میدن. حتی اگه لازم شد با هوش مصنوعی سادهترش کنن. هدف ما ک…
❤16
Signed Danial Nejadmasoom
"پیروس" پادشاهی بود که در دو جنگ باعث شد رومی ها از میدان عقب نشینی کنند؛ اما به این قیمت که لشکرش تلفات زیادی داد و در مقابل، رومیان هنوز جمعیت زیادی داشتن ... حدود سه قرن بعد، "پلوتارک" مورخ یونانی توی کتاب "زندگی های موازی" از پیروس نقل میکنه که وقتی یکی از اطرافیان پیروس به او بابت پیروزی تبریک گفت، اون پاسخ داده که: If we are victorious in one more battle with the Romans, we shall be utterly ruined. «اگر در یک…
❤21
Signed Danial Nejadmasoom
توی هفتههای گذشته یه اتفاقی افتاد که همیشه دوست داشتم تجربهش کنم، ولی فکر نمیکردم اینقدر زود برام اتفاق بیفته؛ اونم داوری مقاله برای مجلات علمی بود. چند وقت پیش سه تا داوری انجام دادم، امروز هم متوجه شدم اولین گواهی داوری همتای من در Frontiers in Human Neuroscience صادر شده. جالب اینجاست که با فاصله کمی بعد از قبول کردن اولین داوری، از دو مجله دیگه هم برام مقاله فرستادن و تا این لحظه با Frontiers in Human Neuros…
❤53👍2
Signed Danial Nejadmasoom
مطالعات متعدد fMRI اثبات کردهاند که وقتی بحث زمانبندی فعالیت مغز وسط باشد، EEG ابزار بهتری است... قبل از اینکه از من ایراد فنی بگیرید که «چطور از مطالعات fMRI میشه دربارهی EEG نتیجه گرفت؟»، از شما دعوت میکنم تصویر بالا را با دقت ببینید. در علوم اعصاب، هیچ روشی بهترین نیست. هر ابزار، برای پاسخ دادن به یک سؤال طراحی شده. اگر سؤال شما این باشه که فعالیت مغز دقیقاً چه زمانی اتفاق افتاد؟، EEG در حد میلیثانیه پاسخ می…
❤28
Signed Danial Nejadmasoom
کیا حاضرن معلمها رو از مدارس حذف کنن و فناوریهای آموزشی رو جاشون بذارن؟ امروز صبح مهمان آموزش و پرورش گنبد کاووس بودیم تا آناتومیار رو به مدیران مدارس معرفی کنیم. دیدم انرژی جلسه پایینه. هنوز لپتاپم رو کامل وصل نکرده بودم که گفتم: «کیا موافقن معلمها رو حذف کنیم؟ » همه مخالفت کردن. همه با تعجب نگام کردن؛ انگار با چشاشون میگفتن این دیگه چی داره میگه؟ دیگه تا آخر ارائه جواب این سؤال رو ندادم و به مقایسه آموزش س…
❤32👍2👎2
Signed Danial Nejadmasoom
خواب برادر مرگ نیست؛ نخوابیدن است ... مسلمونها یه روایتی دارن که میگه «النَّومُ أخُو المَوتِ» یعنی خواب برادر مرگه. جالبه توی اساطیر یونان باستان هم «هیپنوس» (خدای خواب) و «تاناتوس» (خدای مرگ) رو برادران دوقلو میدونستن. اما بیاید به برعکس این فکر کنیم، اینکه: خواب برادر مرگ نیست؛ اتفاقاً نخوابیدن (یا بد موقع خوابیدن) همون عاملیه که فیزیولوژی بدن و روان مارو به مرور زمان متلاشی میکنه. چند وقت پیش یکی از شما توی ک…
❤29
Signed Danial Nejadmasoom
#سوال_شما ⁉️پرسش: سلام و درود برشما روزتون بخیر من دانشجوی ترم پنج روانشناسیام رشتهی دبیرستانیم هم تجربی بوده و پایهی قوی توی فیزیولوژی دارم... همون موقع که رشته روانشناسی رو انتخاب کردم، تصمیمم رو گرفته بودم که ارشد "شناختی" بخونم بخاطر علاقهام کتابهای مرتبط زیادی رو خوندم -فصلای مربوط به نوروساینس کتاب گایتون، فیزیولوژی کالات، شناختی استرنبرگ، علوم اعصاب نیکول گیج و روانشناسی تکاملی دیوید ام باس...- نسبت به رشت…
❤7👍1
Signed Danial Nejadmasoom
‼️ #سوال_شما: پاسخ این سوال رو توی پست زیر باهاتون به اشتراک میذارم. اگر شما هم سوالی دارید از طریق آیدی من می تونین باهام در میون بذارین: @dan_njd
Signed Danial Nejadmasoom
📚 مجموعه «واکسن مغز» دیروز به دستمون رسید! فلسفه این مجموعه نزدیک به مطالعه معروف FINGER هست که در Lancet منتشر شد؛ اینکه پیشگیری از افت شناختی و آلزایمر، حاصل یک راهکار جادویی (یه داروی جادویی، رژیم غذایی عجیب و ... ) نیست، بلکه نتیجه مجموعهای از مداخلات مبتنی بر شواهد در خواب، تغذیه، فعالیت بدنی، سلامت روان، روابط اجتماعی و کنترل عوامل خطر پزشکی است. سری واکسن مغز ۴ جلد دارد : ▪️نقشه راه مغز سالم: از عادات روزم…
❤25
Signed Danial Nejadmasoom
در راستای پستی که اینجا نوشتم؛ سخنرانی من تنها بخشی از یه پلن درمانی چندجانبه ست. برای دیدن سایر تخصصها به کانال انجمن نورو-رژیم دانشگاه تهران (نورونات) مراجعه کنید.
❤5
Signed Danial Nejadmasoom
5️⃣ پارت پنجم کیس کلاب گوارش 🌀 هيپنوتراپي مبتنى بر محور مغز- روده 👤 مدرس: دانيال نژادمعصوم روانشناس و هيپنوتراپيست عناوین: • انتخاب بيمار مناسب • جایگاه هيپنوتراپي در IBS • هيپنوتراپى يا CBT؟ • تمرين هاى كاربردى براى بيمار ثبت نام: @neuronut_admin 🆔 @NeuroNut_tums
❤9👍1
Signed Danial Nejadmasoom
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @NeuroLab_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 888,547 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دانیال نژادمعصوم| NeuroLab” (@NeuroLab_Official), 3,746 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NeuroLab_Official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.