Channel
@NeuroArtistEllina
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002307886471 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NeuroArtistEllina |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NeuroArtistEllina |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 16 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 15 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 16 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 16 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 9 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
15 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 7 | 46.7% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2025 to 24 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🛠 Недавно я уже писала, что ищу маленькие сверла для одной моей задумки… В общем, нашла! Да, и даже проткнула пальцы 😅, но зато посмотрите, какая красота появилась. В создании фото мне, конечно, помогли нейросети — они сделали кадр ярким и атмосферным, но настоящая магия всё-таки в руках 😉 P.S.: серьги созданы по-настоящему , в реальном мире моими собственным руками .
❤3🥴1
«Важнейшими из всех искусств для нас являются кино, вино и домино!»
Потрясающее настроение в этот четверг, надеюсь у вас тоже 😇 Знаете, а я теперь не просто ИИшница ( и даже не просто AI Artist), а официальный амбассадор одного приложения, где можно делать видео из текста. И это не те допотопные движухи, а реально качественный и реалистичный контент! Движок — VEO3 (и да, они уже затачиваются под Sora2 так что будет еще круче). Никаких танцев с бубнами ( покупка зарубежных аккаунто…
🔥2
Кто бы мог подумать , что сейчас так популярны шаржи ?)))
😁2
Немного юмора
🎬 Недавно я закончила монтаж влога про Эльбрус. В сцене «Оборона Эльбруса» я решила поэкспериментировать с нейросетями: где-то оживила настоящие фотографии, а где-то создала кадры сама. Да, если смотреть ролики отдельно — можно заметить некоторые шероховатости, по которым видно, что это работа ИИ. Но в смонтированной сцене всё смотрится органично и даже очень натурально.
👍1
💎 Мало кто знает, но я увлекаюсь созданием украшений. И с натуральными камнями, и с искусственно выращенными — люблю превращать детали в красоту. Нейросети помогают мне создавать визуал — атмосферные картинки, которые уже сами по себе работают как реклама . Чуть позже я покажу вам эксклюзивные изделия 👀✨ А пока… ищу подходящую ювелирную дрель, которая поможет воплотить задумки в жизнь. 🤣
👍1
Среда - маленькая пятница ! А как ваши дела ?
🔥1
Channel name was changed to «ИИшница»
🦊 В новом выпуске моего тревел-влога «Зато красиво» есть кадр… с лисой. Да-да, ради одной секунды видео пришлось придумать и «оживить» её с нуля. Иногда именно такие маленькие детали делают историю цельной и атмосферной. Что скажете — кадр того стоил?
🔥4
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @NeuroArtistEllina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИИшница” (@NeuroArtistEllina), 16 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NeuroArtistEllina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.