Channel
@NerochainOfficial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
50,609subscribers
-556 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002185216950 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NerochainOfficial |
| Description | NERO is the self-sovereign economy layer — infrastructure enabling applications to operate independent on-chain economies. ⛓️ https://nerochain.io https://x.com/Nerochain_io https://discord.gg/nerochainofficial |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NerochainOfficial |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 50,609 | -73 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 50,682 | -98 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 50,780 | -110 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 50,890 | -41 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 50,931 | -109 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 51,040 | -96 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 51,136 | -29 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 51,165 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,315 |
| Reactions total | 29 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
49 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 79.6% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 18.4% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Building the bridge between real-world assets and on-chain finance. We showed our partners the infrastructure we are building to unlock new financial use cases for real-world assets. One of the key areas we are actively working on is gold. Gold remains one of the world's largest stores of value, yet much of its infrastructure is still slow, fragmented, and difficult to use within digital finance. See our full pos…
❤1
The NERO Community X space is now live! Join us our team share updates, roadmaps, discuss the next phase of @Nerochain_io , and answer questions from the community. https://x.com/i/spaces/1nxeLMyzzdoJX
🥷 NERO Samurai July Contribution Review is Now Open! This is your opportunity to share the work you’ve done, the content you created, and how you contributed to the NERO ecosystem Outstanding Samurai will be recognized and rewarded based on their contributions. 📋 Submit your July Evaluation Form: https://forms.gle/TW1EDWd8fUFvsh5WA ⏰ Deadline: 23:59 PM, 13.08.2026 (UTC+8) For discussions, updates, events, and d…
❤1👍1
The next chapter of NERO starts here. Join our CEO @nero__jake for a live community AMA covering updates, future plans, and answer your questions. Let’s talk about what we are building next. Your voice matters. 🗓 Aug 11 | 9PM SGT / 9AM EST Save this link: https://x.com/i/spaces/1nxeLMyzzdoJX
We are listening. Ahead of Tuesday’s Community AMA with NERO CEO @nero__jake, we want to hear from you. What questions do you want the team to answer? Whether it’s about: • NERO’s latest developments • Upcoming plans • Ecosystem growth • Tokenization and RWA • The future of NERO Chain Drop your questions below. Your voice helps shape the conversation.
🔥2
NERO Community AMA! 📢 After months of building, improving, and preparing for the next phase, we are opening the conversation with the community. Join our CEO @nero__jake this Tuesday for a live AMA where he will share updates, discuss upcoming plans, and answer your questions directly. We want to hear from you! 📅 August 11, Tuesday ⏰ 9:00 PM Singapore Time / 9:00 AM EST 📍 NERO X account. Bring your questions. h…
🔥3❤1
Physical assets have powered global markets for centuries. Now, the way they are owned, accessed, and exchanged is evolving. Tokenization creates a bridge between real-world value and digital infrastructure, unlocking new possibilities for ownership, settlement, and market access. Check out what are team at NERO Chain Australia is building: https://x.com/Nerochain_Au/status/2084540241499861280
The best communities are built through open conversations. We’ve been listening. Now it’s time to share more.. More updates. More discussions. More NERO.
❤3
GM NERO! The next era of digital assets won't be built by companies alone. It will be built by communities. What is one thing you want to see built on @Nerochain_io ? Share your ideas below 👇
❤1
The next era of tokenization begins with NERO Chain. Our latest article explores why the future of digital assets depends on more than technology alone, and how NERO Chain is building the foundation for institutional-grade tokenization. Read more 👇 https://x.com/Nerochain_io/status/2082398168084570218
❤2🔥1
NERO is building the infrastructure where applications can become sovereign economies. Read the full breakdown and explore the future of on-chain architecture 👇 https://x.com/Nerochain_io/status/2081847343842996358
Behind the Scenes: NERO Chain Institutional Growth, Clarity & Leadership, and Platform Updates 🔥 From 🇦🇺 to 🇯🇵 - see how we're preparing for the next phase of blockchain infrastructure. Check out our latest thread here: https://x.com/Nerochain_io/status/2080701096209846508
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NerochainOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 835,242 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@NerochainOfficial named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NERO Chain Updates” (@NerochainOfficial), 50,609 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NerochainOfficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.