Channel
@Nephrology_Updates
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,836subscribers
+308 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001462530048 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nephrology_Updates |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nephrology_Updates |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 18:54 | 5,836 | +65 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 5,771 | +15 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 5,756 | +27 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 5,729 | +17 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 5,712 | +19 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 5,693 | +11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 5,682 | +16 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 5,666 | +13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 5,653 | +42 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 5,611 | +16 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 5,595 | +22 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 5,573 | +28 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 5,545 | +16 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 5,529 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 5,528 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
9 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Placental Versus Complement Biology in Postpartum Thrombotic Microangiopathy Attribution https://www.ajkd.org/article/S0272-6386(26)01044-9/fulltext?rss=yes Van Doorn et al. present a valuable synthesis of sFlt-1/PlGF ratios and complement assays in pregnancy-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA).1 I would like to highlight a conceptual issue raised by case COM005 that bears directly on clinical interpretation…
In Reply to “Placental Versus Complement Biology in Postpartum Thrombotic Microangiopathy Attribution” https://www.ajkd.org/article/S0272-6386(26)01045-0/fulltext?rss=yes We thank Dr Sahutoglu for his Letter.1 Pregnant women with increased levels of antiangiogenic factors, such as, sFlt1, are at risk of preeclampsia/HELLP. sFlt1 has been shown to cause preeclampsia in mice, with glomerular endotheliosis.2 Most, if n…
❤1
Spectrum of Anti–Factor B-Associated Glomerular Diseases in Adults https://www.ajkd.org/article/S0272-6386(26)01048-6/fulltext?rss=yes Autoantibodies targeting complement factor B (anti-FB) are among the most recently described alternative pathway anomalies. Although they have been strongly associated with post-infectious glomerulonephritis in children, the clinical phenotypes associated with such antibodies, along …
Health-Related Quality of Life After Living Kidney Donation: Qualitative Studies Can Provide an Important Perspective https://www.ajkd.org/article/S0272-6386(26)01040-1/fulltext?rss=yes We read with great interest the meta-analysis by van de Laar et al1 who report that living kidney donors' quality of life was significantly better than that of the general population and healthy controls. While these findings are val…
Deceased Donor Kidney Allocation Changes and Pediatric Recipients: Are We Making the Best Match? https://www.ajkd.org/article/S0272-6386(26)00974-1/fulltext?rss=yes Kidney transplantation remains a precious and limited resource, with the number of waitlisted patients far exceeding the number of deceased donor kidney transplants performed each year. The kidney transplant community continues to be committed to meeting…
❤2
KDOQI US Commentary on the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Lupus Nephritis https://www.ajkd.org/article/S0272-6386(26)00921-2/fulltext?rss=yes The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) convened a work group to review the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Lupus Nephritis (LN). The management of LN has become increasingly individualized, and treatmen…
❤1
Approved therapies in the IgA nephropathy armamentarium: a summary of the evidence https://www.kisupplements.org/article/S2157-1716(26)00005-5/fulltext?rss=yes Historically, IgA nephropathy (IgAN) was managed using supportive care, with a suggested 6 months of immunosuppressive therapy considered for patients at high risk of progressive kidney function decline (proteinuria, >0.75–1 g/d) despite ≥90 days of optimized…
❤2
Editorial Board https://www.kisupplements.org/article/S2157-1716(26)00008-0/fulltext?rss=yes
Subscription Information https://www.kisupplements.org/article/S2157-1716(26)00009-2/fulltext?rss=yes
Title Page https://www.kisupplements.org/article/S2157-1716(26)00010-9/fulltext?rss=yes
Table of Contents https://www.kisupplements.org/article/S2157-1716(26)00011-0/fulltext?rss=yes
Perceptions of Hispanic Patients with Advanced CKD About Communication and Engagement Regarding Kidney Transplantation: A Qualitative Study https://www.ajkd.org/article/S0272-6386(26)01006-1/fulltext?rss=yes Access to kidney transplantation (KT) for Hispanic patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is often attributed to spoken languages different from their healthcare providers. Effective communication, …
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @Nephrology_Updates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nephrology Updates” (@Nephrology_Updates), 5,836 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nephrology_Updates.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.