Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Neos Announcements

@NeosAnnouncements

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,618subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002490810841
TypeChannel
Username@NeosAnnouncements
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 11 December 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NeosAnnouncements

Growth

13,61813,65713,637.57 August 2026 — 13,657 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,655 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,646 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,640 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,634 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,627 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,618 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,612–13,663 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:4313,618-9
11 Aug 2026, 17:2613,627-7
10 Aug 2026, 16:2713,634-6
9 Aug 2026, 18:1213,640-6
8 Aug 2026, 15:4413,646-9
7 Aug 2026, 18:4013,655-2
7 Aug 2026, 02:1613,657first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
26
Videos
5
Links
35

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
34s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

300 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14147.0%
8528.3%
👍4715.7%
💩62.00%
👎51.67%
😁41.33%
🌚31.00%
20.667%
👏20.667%
😱20.667%
🥰20.667%
🖕10.333%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 300reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2024 to 1 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 May 2025, 13:32 UTC≈1,540 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

📢 NEOS Metabolic Health Study: 1,034 Responses Collected! 🧬 https://x.com/Neos_Research/status/1917929524219568604 We’re thrilled to announce the successful completion of our first Research Interest Proposal— the NEOS Metabolic Health Study — with over 1,034 participants from around the world! 🌍 This is a major milestone for NEOS and for the broader DeSci (Decentralized Science) movement — proving that community-l

🔥5💩4👍32

23 Apr 2025, 18:07 UTC≈1,150 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

GM, Scientists! 🌞 While the market has been down, we've been building in the background—and continuing to plan the future of NEOS and DeSci! 🔬 Today we are super excited to announce our Q2 Roadmap! 💥💥 What you can expect: ✅ Completion of our first Research Interest Proposal—and publishing the results ✅ Additional RIP Onboarding ✅ Recruitment of Scientists and Researchers ✅ and last but not least... the NEOS Ambas

👍6💩1😁1

8 Apr 2025, 15:21 UTC≈1,300 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🚨 The day has finally arrived, NEOS community!! 🚨 After months of building, community feedback, and iteration... The NEOS Platform Beta is LIVE. 🚀🚀🚀 This is a huge step forward for decentralized research—#DeSci As the first of many RIPs (Research Interest Proposals), the NEOS Metabolic Health Study is inviting up to 10,000 participants to join in with their responses. Of the 10,000 participants, 1000 will be cho

🔥5👍1🥰1

27 Mar 2025, 19:31 UTC861 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

GM Scientists!! 🚨 Join us this Friday for an exciting AMA 📢 where we answer all questions about our upcoming Platform Beta Launch! 🚀🚀🚀 👉 This Friday, March 28th, 3PM EST 📅 Hosted by our Director of Operations, @omega_84 🗣 Set reminders here: https://x.com/i/spaces/1YqJDZrVqBVKV And let's raid the tweet and get the momentum going! 🔥🔥 https://x.com/Neos_Research/status/1904268137216045115

2💩1

20 Mar 2025, 17:50 UTC≈1,430 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🚨 HUGE NEWS TODAY! 🚨 The NEOS Public Beta will be officially launching on April 8th, 2025! 🚀🚀🚀 After much planning and development—we are proud to announce that the first iteration of our platform will be open to the public very soon! 🙌 Phase 1 will allow researchers to submit and publish RIPS, gather data, and for users to contribute to data studies for rewards! 🎖 This is a HUGE milestone for NEOS, and we couldn

🔥81👍1🖕1

13 Jan 2025, 15:48 UTC≈1,550 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Read & interact with our first ever Neos X article, Scientists! 🧪 https://x.com/Neos_Research/status/1878830819344867463

13👎1

2 Jan 2025, 20:03 UTC≈1,880 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

space starting now Scientists! tune in here: https://x.com/i/spaces/1vAGROkXXLYJl

5

1 Jan 2025, 15:38 UTC≈2,080 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Tomorrow we'll be hosting our first-ever X spaces AMA with our director of operations, Robert Williams!🧑‍🔬 Tune in tomorrow at 3PM EST to learn more about $NEOS and the Neos Platform! Smash Scientists: https://x.com/Neos_Research/status/1874480002429059175

10🔥4👍2👎1

28 Dec 2024, 19:32 UTC≈2,000 views28 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🚨 Announcement 🚨 GM Scientists! I will be formally introducing myself in a video message on Monday! So proud to be a leading member of this community, and looking forward to the journey ahead. I will also be organizing a community AMA next week, and can't wait to hear from our fellow Scientists with your questions and comments! Let's get ready for an amazing 2025! LFG!! 👨‍🔬👩‍🔬

👍199

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NeosAnnouncements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,084,770 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Neos Announcements” (@NeosAnnouncements), 13,618 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NeosAnnouncements.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.