Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

✧° ⊹ 。𝖭𝖾𝗈 / 脂肪 /🍧

@Neo_coser

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

205subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002147769840
TypeChannel
Username@Neo_coser
Description.⁠✧ •—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—• ✧. связь: @Neo_meoww щп: https://t.me/+W_yTlu9gmvA5NzRi tiktok: neo.coser 2202206751980397 поддержать меня↝ ネオ✧⁠*⁠。
CreatedBetween 1 April 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Neo_coser

Growth

2057 Aug 2026, 05:03 — 205 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:48 — 205 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:037 Aug 2026, 05:48
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 204–206 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 05:48205no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:03205first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.6%
avg views ÷ 205 subscribers
Avg views / post
124
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held17 (30 May 202627 July 2026)
Views total497
Reactions total97
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
131
Videos
34
Links
15

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

475 reactions across 17 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.89% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5334825959793112459479.89%
custom 5220022647907186523459.47%
custom 5424607668385915744388.00%
custom 5424852069204927111377.79%
custom 5368700856482942622316.53%
custom 5208727798746735607306.32%
custom 5208440293635941964255.26%
custom 5208646817138369547224.63%
custom 5469846309806556739224.63%
custom 5474342363176405521224.63%
custom 5267434276491643585194.00%
custom 5424964730492048789194.00%
💘183.79%
🦄183.79%
custom 5204125406281632219173.58%
custom 5445165001067216932173.58%
custom 5276410092420370187142.95%
custom 5267386361836487219112.32%
custom 527163841381925868591.89%
custom 541811814460032238961.26%
4 further kinds81.68%

Custom emoji. 18 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 475reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Neo_coser. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 May 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 03:37 UTC99 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

новый косплей, отписывайтесь и кидайте репорты

custom 546984630980655673912

Signed ˖ ×\ 𝑁3𝑜 :🫟; ジライ ! ! ゞ彡

27 Jul 2026, 03:37 UTC93 views40 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

урод

custom 542496473049204878919custom 526738636183648721911custom 546984630980655673910

Signed ˖ ×\ 𝑁3𝑜 :🫟; ジライ ! ! ゞ彡

21 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC140 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

у меня новый щп, кто хочет заходите 🌟 https://t.me/+W_yTlu9gmvA5NzRi

custom 53348259597931124599custom 52086468171383695476custom 52087277987467356073

Signed ˖ ×\ 𝑁3𝑜 :🫟; ジライ ! ! ゞ彡

19 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC165 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ууу сикс севен🤙 И ПОЧЕМУ-ТО 200 ЗВЕЗД

custom 520872779874673560713custom 53348259597931124598💘6

Signed ˖ ×\ 𝑁3𝑜 :🫟; ジライ ! ! ゞ彡

12 Jul 2026, 14:22 UTC240 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ыаыа

custom 520844029363594196419custom 520864681713836954715custom 542485206920492711115

Signed ˖ ×\ 𝑁3𝑜 :🫟; ジライ ! ! ゞ彡

11 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC204 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 уже в это воскресенье буду присутствовать на Хокку в Микан Цумики!!🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

custom 520872779874673560714custom 52084402936359419646custom 54248520692049271115custom 52086084845552541411custom 52086468171383695471

Signed ˖ ×\ 𝑁3𝑜 :🫟; ジライ ! ! ゞ彡

9 Jul 2026, 21:10 UTC226 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

хмм

custom 54246076683859157447

Signed ˖ ×\ 𝑁3𝑜 :🫟; ジライ ! ! ゞ彡

9 Jul 2026, 21:10 UTC191 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @maxachalka11037cos

Нео принуди меня к интиму

💘12

Signed ˖ ×\ 𝑁3𝑜 :🫟; ジライ ! ! ゞ彡

9 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC≈1,640 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🦇 сегодня 10 июлЯ, а это значит, что наступил мой день рождения!!! ❤️ я становлюсь ищо старше омг!! 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 этот год выдался для меня насыщенным, было много приятного и не совсем, но все же я рада, что все было именно так🥹 надеюсь и дальше мой день рождения будет приносить мне только положительные эмоции🤩 также хочу сказать БАШОЕ спасибо всем моим друзьям, без вас этот год был бы оче

custom 533482595979311245922custom 542460766838591574416custom 547434236317640552115custom 54248520692049271111

Signed ˖ ×\ 𝑁3𝑜 :🫟; ジライ ! ! ゞ彡

3 Jul 2026, 22:17 UTC228 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

спасибоо🥰 скоро новый косплей!! ыыы активить

custom 542485206920492711116custom 54743423631764055217custom 54246076683859157445

Signed ˖ ×\ 𝑁3𝑜 :🫟; ジライ ! ! ゞ彡

3 Jul 2026, 22:16 UTC205 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lovecospPhoto

У нэо прекрасная мадока 💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀

custom 520412540628163221917custom 542460766838591574410custom 53348259597931124598

Signed ˖ ×\ 𝑁3𝑜 :🫟; ジライ ! ! ゞ彡

8 Jun 2026, 08:43 UTC383 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ыыы кико ыыы мне понравилось 🌟

custom 536870085648294262222custom 544516500106721693213custom 52200226479071865239custom 54181181446003223892

Signed ˖ ×\ 𝑁3𝑜 :🍧; ジライ ! ! ゞ彡

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Neo_coser. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 365,337 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✧° ⊹ 。𝖭𝖾𝗈 / 脂肪 /🍧” (@Neo_coser), 205 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Neo_coser.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.