Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нейротворец

Channel

Нейротворец

@Neirodel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,128subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002403798393
TypeChannel
Username@Neirodel
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Neirodel

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,1272,1342,130.57 August 2026 — 2,128 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,128 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,127 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,130 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,132 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,133 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,134 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,132 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,128 subscribers2,1287 August 20267 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 31 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,126–2,135 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 08:572,128-4
2 Sept 2026, 18:472,132-2
30 Aug 2026, 12:542,134+1
24 Aug 2026, 07:122,133+1
20 Aug 2026, 14:042,132+2
18 Aug 2026, 00:122,130+3
11 Aug 2026, 03:452,127-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:222,128no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:472,128first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 18 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

447 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥11626.0%
😁9922.1%
👍9421.0%
5311.9%
💯327.16%
👀132.91%
❤‍🔥122.68%
😢112.46%
👌71.57%
🙏40.895%
💔30.671%
😱20.447%
🤝10.224%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 447 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 14 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Neirodel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 06:05 UTC656 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если вдруг кто то устал ( как и я ) от бесконечных капризов нейронок по типу "мы не можем это сгенерировать потому что известное лицо, персонаж или еще какая блажь" - рекомендую обратить внимание на reve 2.1 Там (пока) такого нет. Я только что делал там сетку известного персонажа, и оно вполне пропускает. Допускает ошибки, правда, в деталях, но в целом гемора всё равно меньше чем с бананой и гпт. (seedream кстати т

👍27

20 Jul 2026, 12:13 UTC≈1,170 views75 reactionsread 7 August 2026

За последние 10 дней мне пришло 7! Предложений от "маркетологов ", предлагающих помочь мне сделать курсы по ИИ. В чем же заключается помощь, спросите вы? Они предлагают мне сделать воронку продаж на МОЕМ же тг канале, чтобы с МОЕГО же канала тянуть паству в обучение в отдельный тг канал. И брать 50 процентов за это. У меня к ним только 2 вопроса: 1 вопрос. А на кой черт мне тогда ВЫ? И 2 вопрос. Вы там ебанулис

😁46🔥14💯113😱1

15 Jul 2026, 12:52 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 7 August 2026

Граждане! Дико извиняюсь, есть у кого адоб премьер не старше 23 года крякнутый? Новый ноут купил специально с киношками работать помощнее, а утановщики все похерились. С торренот качаю крякнутые - все с вируснёй какой то. Есть у кого нормальный?

7 Jul 2026, 14:53 UTC≈1,600 views45 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ладно. Начинаю делать сценарий к 3 серии Кусаки. Ждете? ☺️

🔥38👍5❤‍🔥2

7 Jul 2026, 10:27 UTC≈1,540 views70 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

🔥Популярные мифы про нейронки, креаторов и их заказчиков: 1. Контент заводы - это тема. Это полная Херня. Нет такой системы которая позволит шлёпать ролики как пирожки БЕЗ вмешательства человека и качественно. Если вы заказчик, и вам некий "автоматизированный контент завод" клепает массово ролики - скорее там сидит толпа "индусов" за 3 копейки. А ваш подрядчик делает морду тяпкой и чешет вам уши что он якобы склепал

22💯18👍16😁8💔3🔥3

1 Jul 2026, 14:51 UTC≈1,210 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А амбассадором клинг меня так и не сделал. И это после всего того, что между нами было... 😪 Подлец.

😁12😢11🙏4

1 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Голосуем за обложку!

  1. 14%
  2. 229%
  3. 313%
  4. 41%
  5. 553%
  6. 65%
  7. 711%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC≈1,190 views6 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Голо сование! Может я не ту обложку выбрал? Вот еще вот такие варианты есть! Как думаете - может сменить обложку на ютубе? Кто за какую? (под желтым номером)

3🔥2❤‍🔥1

1 Jul 2026, 07:06 UTC993 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Тяжела и неказиста жизнь ИИшного артиста. Когда я выложил "пешехода", подписочники на ютубах ныли что хотят новых "червей". После пешехода, когда я выложил "новый мир" плакали, что хотят продолжения "пешехода". После "Кусаки" многие писали что все фигня и хотят новый "новый мир". Теперь, когда выложил "желание" спрашивают когда новая серия "Кусаки". Да что черт подери происходит?

😁33🔥3

30 Jun 2026, 15:46 UTC≈1,150 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥Фильм THE WISH УЖЕ В ЮТУБАХ на русском языке. Прошу любить и жаловаться. Можно смотреть на русском языке с дополнениями по сценам. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YLdmSTzJcU

🔥21👍174👀4❤‍🔥2

29 Jun 2026, 09:14 UTC950 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Посчитал во сколько мне вышел последний 7 минутный фильм в сиданс. Ну его нахер, ребята. Пойду обратно в клинг. А сиданс оставлю только на драки.

🔥12👀9❤‍🔥21🤝1😱1

24 Jun 2026, 13:49 UTC≈1,270 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Доделываю проект "THE WISH". (структурирую мысли) Так, господа. Главное в нашем деле работа над ошибками, так ведь? Раз работа конкурсная, надо попробовать дожать. Провёл анализ короткометражки (вашими стараниями совместно с ГПТ) И выяснилось что главные моменты, которые смутили икушенного зрителя (то есть вас, товарищи) - вот они: 1. Слишком заметна "иишность" некоторых кадров 2. Мелкие косяки генерации 3. Слишком

👍15🔥73

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Neirodel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTCAnonymous Poll167 voters

Голосуем за обложку!

  1. 14%
  2. 229%
  3. 313%
  4. 41%
  5. 553%
  6. 65%
  7. 711%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нейротворец” (@Neirodel), 2,128 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Neirodel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.