Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NEBRA VIRT

Channel

NEBRA VIRT

@Nebra_Virts

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,097subscribers

-161 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003463569928
TypeChannel
Username@Nebra_Virts
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Nebra_Virts

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,0847,5375,310.57 August 2026 — 7,258 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,258 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,319 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,302 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,212 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,084 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,471 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,537 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,526 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,522 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,498 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,402 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,434 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,310 subscribers26 September 2026 — 7,097 subscribers7,0977 August 202626 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 51 days, net -161. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,416–8,205 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 20:367,097-213
17 Sept 2026, 16:207,310-124
13 Sept 2026, 18:407,434+32
10 Sept 2026, 01:217,402-96
4 Sept 2026, 08:017,498-24
1 Sept 2026, 02:157,522-4
29 Aug 2026, 03:177,526-11
26 Aug 2026, 00:377,537+66
22 Aug 2026, 21:157,471+4,387
19 Aug 2026, 17:123,084-4,128
16 Aug 2026, 22:347,212-90
13 Aug 2026, 10:147,302-17
10 Aug 2026, 06:317,319+61
7 Aug 2026, 10:107,258no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:467,258first reading

Engagement

209 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 209 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1s
Average length
1s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

157 reactions across 41 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2314.6%
👍2314.6%
🔥2012.7%
❤‍🔥1912.1%
💋106.37%
💯106.37%
🤡85.10%
🤝74.46%
🤣74.46%
🕊63.82%
🤮63.82%
💘42.55%
⚡31.91%
😍31.91%
💅21.27%
😇21.27%
👀10.637%
🖕10.637%
🗿10.637%
😱10.637%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 209 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 209 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC65 viewsread 12 August 2026

✈️#ANON10 мне грустно,что ушла Акайрия.Я хочу плакать от этого

12 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC51 viewsread 12 August 2026

✈️#ANON10 када все думают што я обычный комментатор небры, но я глав фанатк у меня даже фан канал был боже

12 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC75 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✈️#ANON10 готовились пару месяцев назад с одноклассницей к огэ, вдруг я спалила что она виртуха и что она ролить со своим папочкой, не знаю зачем я храню эти фотки...

🔥2❤‍🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC76 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

✈️#ANON10 давайте все признаем наше разочарование, когда мы начали читать мёртвых душ, а там про каких-то рабов, а не про мистику. мне даже скучно стало от этого

🤝1

12 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC81 viewsread 12 August 2026

✈️#ANON2 Я сильно разочарована в ппс. Это ужас. Опубликовали в достаточно гигантский анон проект липсинг девочки с откровенными о#ками в ее сторону. То, что оно было в общем доступе не отменяет факта, что это едучий буллинг в сторону девчонки. У админа была прекрасная возможность либо вообще не публиковать, либо опубликовать под блюром(и то заслали бы). Но он позолно плоебал этот шанс

12 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC71 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

✈️#ANON10 как же обидно вспоминать, что тебя родители буквально ненавидели, били, ругались всегда

🤝2

12 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC70 viewsread 12 August 2026

Предлагаю перед шиппами обсудить виртух.

12 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC65 viewsread 12 August 2026

✈️#ANON10 А почему анонки про Дилана прекратились? Я считаю, что про него надо больше говорить

12 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC128 viewsread 12 August 2026

шиппы. точку в комм. ПОСЛЕ СТОПА НЕ ВОЗЬМУ НАХЕР начну где-то ближе к ночи

12 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC126 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

✈️#ANON14 Я хочу встречаться с нарциссом он только мой!

🤣6

12 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC131 viewsread 12 August 2026

✈️#ANON10 воздухан кажется очень грубым и злым, мне даже страшно ему писать

12 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC128 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

✈️#ANON10 Мне так нравится небра. Самый активный и в принципе лучший анон проект

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 209 posts we hold for @Nebra_Virts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NEBRA VIRT” (@Nebra_Virts), 7,097 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nebra_Virts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.