✈️#ANON15 Я только вернулась в вирт. Блчть, что черт возьми происходит, то вы мужиков ненавидитн, хотя это неудивительно. То вы женщин ненавидите, то блчть про еьлю и стоны, то про инкест. Мне очень страшно, у меня нет слов чтоб сказать что я чувствую, единственное что я могу выразить это стикер полного недопонимания, это пкздец

Channel
NEBRA VIRT
@Nebra_Virts
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,042subscribers
+784 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003463569928 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nebra_Virts |
| Description | Cccl's wife Price — @Pricenbv |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nebra_Virts |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 07:10 | 8,042 | -59 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:16 | 8,101 | +11 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:41 | 8,090 | +127 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:51 | 7,963 | +163 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 17:21 | 7,800 | +270 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 7,530 | +137 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 11:18 | 7,393 | +137 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 7,256 | -3 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 11:20 | 7,259 | +21 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 10:01 | 7,238 | +141 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 7,097 | -213 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 7,310 | -124 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 7,434 | +32 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 7,402 | -96 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 7,498 | -24 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 7,522 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 7,526 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 7,537 | +66 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 7,471 | +4,387 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 3,084 | first reading |
Engagement
566 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.23%
- avg views ÷ 8,042 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 99.0
- 357 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.06%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 357
- of 566 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 357 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 566 (7 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 35,341 |
| Reactions total | 115 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 01:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,780
- Videos
- ≈193
- Links
- ≈4,320
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 47s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
272 reactions across 74 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 54 | 19.9% | |
| 🤡 | 40 | 14.7% | |
| 👍 | 29 | 10.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 27 | 9.93% | |
| 💯 | 26 | 9.56% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 8.46% | |
| 💋 | 11 | 4.04% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 3.68% | |
| 🤮 | 9 | 3.31% | |
| 💘 | 7 | 2.57% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 2.57% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 2.21% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 1.47% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 1.10% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 1.10% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 0.735% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.735% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 0.735% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 0.735% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 0.735% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 566 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 272 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 566 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 357 posts held from the last 30 days (3.08%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
✈️#ANON15 я максимально стою против бтс, осуждаю их поступки в прошлом, но у самой перс чонгук. факин шит мне очень стыдно братья, я не выдерживаю уже этого давления. с одной стороны я только ношу его рожу на аве, но в вирте не могу прямо их обосрть, тк виртушки закрывают на все глаза, будто не имеют доступа к информации о них и если я не дай бог что-то плохое о них ляпну сразу накинутся как собаки, главное оправдыва…
🤡2
✈️#ANON15 Что с аккаунтом аморала, что за точка? считаю что аморал должен вернуть ник, с ним он красивее
✈️#ANON15 Я мужененавистница и мизогинка в одном обличии, считаб, что все дол#аебы и всех на кук#н посадить, и вообще завтра в 5 утра конец света, я все сказала
❤1
✈️#ANON15 Вы выберите остаться в лесу с мужчиной или с медведем и почему. Я бы осталась с мужчиной ибо медведь вас тупо убь#т
✈️#ANON15 🔗Ответ на сообщение. Мне очень плохо от того, что происходит в коммах небры, ребят, как вы с темы на тему прыгаете как по хкям, пкздец.
❤1
✈️#ANON15 Как же меня зае#али эти мужененавистницы и девушки с синдромом жертвы, везде присунут что их нас#луют, уб#вают, избивают и используют, считая абсолютно всех парней врагами и дикими животными, лечитесь пожалуйста вы е#анутые
✈️#АNОN3 Десомша самая не смешная виртуха которая делает вид что всех ненавидит а сама потом плачет в подушку потому что на нее не обратили внимание ее конч#ные 5 мьюшек🥺🥺
✈️#ANON15 Кстати, по поводу стонов, вы занимались любовью? Нет, серьёзно? Если да, то вам, рил, хотелось стонать? Просто интересно, я сама 1 раз занималась, и я ничего не испытала, кроме того, что он, бл#ть, долбится, как будто через 5 минут конец света, и мне было неприятно, он был грубым или со мной что-то не так... Даже не знаю как описать это
✈️#ANON15 Как же в коммах Долматова сует свой нос всюду и каждую защищает 🤦♀️😂😂😂😂 Думаю, что ей пора перестать всем жлпы лизать
✈️#ANON15 Бля заговорили О Т#рч,с х#я она селе возомнила что может отказывать мью челам с маленькой аудиторией? Откуда я бл#ть сразу 245676+ к подписчиков возьму Много о себе думает как и Метис,Накмнрк,Хигвей— никогда актива и считаю, что у таких всегда вые#оны б#ядские
❤1
✈️#ANON15 🔗Ответ на сообщение. Так это ведь норм,качество улучшают Конечно когда перебор это наглядно видно 🤷♀️ Сами архивы годные. Мне нравится Т#рч и его оформление и то что он не так мало как многие выкладывает мт. Хотя хотелось бы чаще
Showing the 12 most recent of 566 posts we hold for @Nebra_Virts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@archivebatard · 15 postsreviews
@reviewstudi · 15 postsmenthe. Blg
@BRT8OP0 · 2264 postsstudio GLAZE
@GLAZZZE · 4352 postsJewel
@Jewel_studio · 1352 postsвидео арешков
@APEX12V · 1321 postBurn закрыты.
@BURNfam · 1171 postCCCL
@CCCLZPRJT · 8,3241 postGlam closed
@H2M16 · 5621 poststudio keras
@STATE_VIRTgdus · 6781 post.
@T4BAK_FML · 131 post김민지 Kim Min-ji
@TrueKimMinjiReal · 1031 postрест майор.
@URGOD1 · 1011 postHighwáy
@VI7END · 4,1621 postЗакрыт | бᴧядᴄᴋий уᴦᴏдниᴋ.
@YG0DN11K · 1691 postZEUD
@ZeudStd · 2161 postAPEX
@aanyrs · 1,9531 postрест апостол.
@apostlles · 2911 postarchives
@arhhmdd · 21 postархив.
@brinned · 11 postличный психолог.
@flsmshhd · 1241 postجمال الروحY
@yumisdfd · 151 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@DL97XL · 15,4783 postsПозор виртух
@pozor_v1rta · 14,3913 postsAlter Jk
@crenxz · 11,4322 postsArch Bâtard
@archivebatard · 11 postDesviada.
@Godevis · 181 postGlam closed
@H2M16 · 5621 postIDRIS WELL
@idrisswell · 3,5071 post—
@mefkaproebalas · 61 postLonely
@XEXEXEXEXEXEXXEE · 11 postㅤ
@ZXCLLEN · 21 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NEBRA VIRT” (@Nebra_Virts), 8,042 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nebra_Virts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.