این دوتا توییت بالا بمونن اینجا. در طول فصل بنا به شرایط ممکنه لازمم بشن. •Mo.Ali• @NbaBadTweet

Channel
NbaBadTweet
@NbaBadTweet
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,787subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001445458702 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NbaBadTweet |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NbaBadTweet |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 2,787 | +8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 2,779 | -10 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 2,789 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:12 | 2,790 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 2,789 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 2,790 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 2,792 | +3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 2,789 | +19 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 2,770 | -8 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 2,778 | +9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 2,769 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 2,770 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 2,769 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
192 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 94 | 49.0% | |
| 🤣 | 51 | 26.6% | |
| 👎 | 18 | 9.38% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 6.77% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 4.17% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 2.60% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
من فقط پیسرز و سیکسرز رو گردن میگیرم والسلام. البته قدیمی کارا یادشونه به دلیل ارادتم به جناب دریماند گرین و همچنین نسخه های دیترویت بدبویز ۱ و ۲، علاقه زیادی هم به پیستونز و گلدن داشتم ولی همچنان اینارو گردن نمیگیرم. از شایعه پراکنی بپرهیزید •Mo.Ali• @NbaBadTweet
🤣2
من فقط گلدن و دیترویت رو گردن میگیرم والسلام. البته قدیمی کارا یادشونه به دلیل ارادتم به جناب آیورسن و همچنین نسخه های پیسرز اواخر دهه ۹۰ و اوایل ۲۰۰۰ و دوران پال جرج، علاقه زیادی هم به پیسرز و فیلی داشتم ولی همچنان اینارو گردن نمیگیرم. از شایعه پراکنی بپرهیزید •Mo.Ali• @NbaBadTweet
مقدمه چینیای موعلی برا اضافه کردن ی تیم دیگه به تیمای مورد علاقه ش: •a.z• @NbaBadTweet
🤣6
منم پیشنهاد میکنم بازی های هاکس رو از دست ندید یه راستر جوان و بسیار استخونیی ساختن برای فصل بعد و قراره خیلی از بازیکنای موردعلاقتونو رو فیلدگل گریه دار نگهدارن. دایسن دنیلز و لوگنتز دورت و جیلن جانسن و اونیکا اکانگوو به همراه NAW و پیک ۸ بسیار جذاب امسالشون کینگستن فلمینگز و سیجی مککالم دوست داشتنی. فراموش نکنیم هاکس تیمیه که پارسال با راستری ضعیف تر ازین اومد ۴۶ تا برد گرفت و تنها تیمی بود که تو پلی آف سری رو …
❤2
یکی از تیمای جذاب این فصل که به نظرم خیلی فان تو واچه ، واشنگتن ویزاردزه.. یعنی دیدن پیک یک پراستعداد درفت امسال در کنار آیس تری و دیاندره ایتن و البته به شرط سلامت انتونی دیویسی که بعد از چند سال میتونه به پست ۴ برگرده قطعا لذت بخش خواهد بود. این تیم اما و اگر زیاد داره اولیش بحث سلامتیه.. دومین مورد فیت بودن این راستره.. مورد سوم غیرقابل اتکا بودن آپشن اصلیای این تیمه.. یعنی طبق چیزی که تا الان تو کریر دیویس …
👍6❤2
بحث همیشه سازنده هم حال نمیده. گاهی باید سیکیوز درونتو روشن کنی بزنی زیر میز. هیچکس جز من و دریماند قبول نداره که دریماند بهترین مدافع تاریخه ولی I'll die on that one بعدشم نظر اولی(پیپن و جردن) که درسته مشکلت چیه. •Mo.Ali• @NbaBadTweet
🔥5
بحث و کل کل قسمت مهمی از ورزش و طرفداریه اتفاقا با ادمی که فهمش رو داره خیلیم جذابه من مشکلی با اون ندارم ولی خب ممکنه بحث کنی یهو برگرده بگه اگه پیپن نبود جردن هیچ گوهی نبود یا مثلا سوییپران •MT• @NbaBadTweet
❤4
بازار خرابی نکن متاجی. ما مردم عادی به عشق این چیزا زنده ایم. باید تا ۹۰ سالگی سنگ اینکه دریماند بهترین مدافع تاریخه رو به سینه بزنیم و استفن کری رو بالاتر از ایدزی بذاریم و لبران رو بالاتر از قمارباز. بیرون گود نشستن اصلا کیف نمیده. •Mo.Ali• @NbaBadTweet
😁8
به نظر من استف مشخصا کیسی برای بهترین تاریخ بودن، به هیچ یک از معانی یی که به صورت گسترده در جامعه بسکتبال از این عبارت استفاده میشه، نداره. چون این عبارت معمولا در دلش معنی موفقیت تجمعی هم میده و استف به دلایل مختلف موفقیت تجمعیش در طول کریرش به اندازهای نیست که نزدیک برای رقابت سر این عنوان باشه. اما، اگر درباره بهترین پرایم و بالاترین سطح بازی در بازه مشخصی بحث کنیم، با هر معیاری که در نظر بگیرید استف قطعا تو بح…
👍12❤2👎1
🏀 بسکتبال بدون پست؛ آخرین میخ بر تابوت بسکتبال سنتی سالها بسکتبال با پنج پست مشخص تعریف میشد؛ پوینت گارد، شوتینگ گارد، اسمال فوروارد، پاور فوروارد و سنتر. اما NBA مدرن این مرزها را بهتدریج کمرنگ کرده است. امروز سنترها بازیسازی میکنند، گاردها ریباند میگیرند و بازیکنان چندمهارته بیش از گذشته ارزش تاکتیکی پیدا کردهاند. آیا پستهای سنتی در حال نابودیاند، یا بسکتبال فقط در حال تعریف دوباره آنهاست؟ 📖 مقاله در…
به نظرم اینو جا بندازیم که اصلا اهمیتی به نظرات کارشناسان و تریبون دارای احمق آمریکا ندیم مایکل جردن بزرگترین بازیکن تاریخ بسکتباله لبران جیمزم احتمالا کامل ترین بازیکن تاریخه و جفتشون کاملا لایق این هستن که بهترین تاریخ شناخته بشن حالا ممکنه یکی کریم عبدالجبار رو بهترین تاریخ بدونه ، کریمم لایقه من خودم یکی دوسالیه تصمیم گرفتم تو اینطور بحثا کلا شرکت نکنم اگه تو معتقدی استف کری بهترین بازیکن تاریخه نظرت مورد احترام…
👍27❤2👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NbaBadTweet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@NBA2K16 · 31,414
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
@mp3lyric · 35,700
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 2 September 2026
@nimaebrahimi_1 · 53,017
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 24 August 2026
@radioketabdoni · 34,094
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 10 September 2026
@mmapersianchannel · 21,524
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 September 2026
@NBAInjuries · 104,085
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
@aparatsport · 34,543
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
@wsgyg · 28,479
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NbaBadTweet” (@NbaBadTweet), 2,787 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NbaBadTweet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.