Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🇳 🇦 🇿 🇦 | 𝗢𝗙𝗖

Channel

🇳 🇦 🇿 🇦 | 𝗢𝗙𝗖

@NazaOfc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

18subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001488365544
TypeChannel
Username@NazaOfc
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 16 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/NazaOfc

Growth

181918.57 August 2026 — 19 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19 subscribers12 October 2026 — 18 subscribers7 August 202612 October 2026
3 measurements spanning 66 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18–19 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 11:5618-1
11 Aug 2026, 16:4619no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:1219first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 16 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 November 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
33s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

20 Nov 2021, 15:10 UTC632 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

[🚀] INDIQUE E GANHE PROMOÇÃO EM CIMA DE PROMOÇÃO QUANTIDADE - PRÊMIO [🏷️]- INDICOU 1 - 20$ [🏷️]- INDICOU 2 - 40$ [🏷️]- INDICOU 3 - 60$ [🏷️]- INDICOU 4 - 80$ [🏷️]- INDICOU 5 - 100$ [🏷️]- INDICOU 6 - 120$ [🏷️]- INDICOU 7 - 1K DE FAKE [💰] PREÇO DAS FAKES: [🎉]- PROMOÇÃO FINAL DE ANO NOTAS FAKES [💵]- FIBRADO QUANTIDADE - PREÇO [💸]- 1.000 - R$240 [💸]- 2.000 - R$470 [💸]- 5.000 - R$900 [💸]- 10.000 - R$1.500 [💸]- 20.0…

4 Sept 2021, 00:27 UTC443 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

Cliente recebeu suas notas 💸💸💸 @RefsRhino @RefsNaza @NazaOfc @FAQ_NAZA @SuporteNaza @NazaSuporte

21 Aug 2021, 14:45 UTC337 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

As nota pae qualidade intacta 💸🚀 @RefsRhino @RefsNaza @NazaOfc @FAQ_NAZA @SuporteNaza @NazaSuporte

21 Aug 2021, 14:44 UTC195 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

💸 ℝℍ𝕀ℕ𝕆 𝔻𝔸𝕊 𝔽𝔸𝕂𝔼𝕊 💸 @SystemRhino Compre Já as Notas Fakes com os melhores preços do Mercado! Segue a Tabela: Fibrado: Notas — Valor R$1000,00 — R$260 (Promoção) R$3000,00 — R$770 (Melhor Preço) R$5000,00 — R$1300 R$10000,00 — R$2600 + SEDEX Fibrado Liso: Notas — Valor R$1000,00 — R$300 (promoção) R$3000,00 — R$890 (Melhor Preço) R$5000,00 — R$1500 R$10000,00 — R$3000 + SEDEX (Desconto 5% na compra de…

20 Aug 2021, 04:58 UTC351 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🥵 ARTE FEITA POR UM DESIGNER DA NAZA, QUER UMA TAMBÉM? 🥵 CHAME ELE AQUI @SystemRhino @RefsRhino @RefsNaza @NazaOfc @FAQ_NAZA @SuporteNaza @NazaSuporte

18 Aug 2021, 15:27 UTC127 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Erro corrigido no método atualizado, corridas 0,00 on ✅ @SystemRhino @RefsRhino @RefsNaza @NazaOfc @SuporteNaza @NazaSuporte

17 Aug 2021, 16:43 UTC101 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

FAQ PARA NOVOS CLIENTES DA NAZA™ AQUI VOCÊ ENCONTRA DÚVIDAS FREQUÊNTES FEITA POR CLIENTES, CONFIRA ABAIXO↓ REEMBOLSO O QUE É E PRA QUE SERVE INFO CC'S? QUAL O LIMITE DE CC? MINHA CC NÃO ESTÁ SUBINDO ONDE POSSO RESGATAR O GIFT METODOS E ESQUEMAS SE EU COLOCAR SEGUIDORES, MINHA CONTA CAÍ? COMPREI LOGIN MAS NÃO APROVOU A ART NÃO SAIU COMO EU ESPERAVA NAS REFS MEUS DADOS SERÃO EXPOSTOS? EXISTE LOTTER NA NAZA?…

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @NazaOfc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇳 🇦 🇿 🇦 | 𝗢𝗙𝗖” (@NazaOfc), 18 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NazaOfc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.