Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Настя про счастье

@Nastia_notes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

291subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001802178377
TypeChannel
Username@Nastia_notes
DescriptionОдинесница в поисках счастья. Тут мысли, книги, фоточки красивого и гедонизм @sAnastasia
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Nastia_notes

Growth

2916 Aug 2026, 05:48 — 291 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:48 — 291 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 05:486 Aug 2026, 22:48
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 290–292 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 22:48291no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:48291first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.7%
avg views ÷ 291 subscribers
Avg views / post
211
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held12 (20 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total2,326
Reactions total194
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
958
Videos
4
Links
152

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

194 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9448.5%
7940.7%
👍178.76%
👀21.03%
😁21.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 194reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 21:25 UTC99 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Так, июль же закончился! А итоги не подведены, непорядок. 1. Что по шагам. Меня тут спросили, как моя цель 1000 км за 3 месяца. От плана отстаю. За июнь-июль пройден 571 км: 275 км в июне и 296 км в июле. На самом деле чуть больше, т.к. пару раз гуляла без браслета. 1000 уже не успею (ну если не считерить и не посчитать еще май или сентябрь), но пока рассчитаю на 900 🤪 2. Устроила себе настоящие "летние каникулы"

9🔥6

3 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC140 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Спасибо, сочту это за комплимент своим "писательским" навыкам😁 Любопытный факт: - есть сферы, где мы хороши и знаем об этом. Например, я всегда считала себя хорошим програмистом. - а есть то, мы про себя не знаем и нам это подсвечивают другие люди. Так я считала всегда, что у меня никаких "творческих"/гуманитарных талантов нет. Просто как-то вышло, что начала "по фану" писать какие-то тексты, истории (тогда ещё в FB

🔥74

3 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC136 viewsread 6 August 2026

Вот у кого СМИ учились делать кликбейтные ссылки 😂

31 Jul 2026, 19:58 UTC235 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Так вот )) Знакомство началось с «КакДелаЧтоДелаешь». Не самый оригинальный вопрос для начала беседы, ну что ж. Решила отвечать буквально: - Ем крыжовник 🍔 Что-то ещё пообсуждали, дошло до того, что договорились встретиться. - Что взять с собой из ягод? - Бери арбуз 🤩 Посмеялись и я про это забыла. Приехал. Звонит и говорит: «Я с арбузом. Выходи, бери нож🔪». Ну я и взяла. Вышла. Действительно — товарищ пришёл с

🔥1812👍8

30 Jul 2026, 19:54 UTC247 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Думаю, рассказать ли вам, как я тут на свидание с ножом ходила 😅

🔥236👀2

29 Jul 2026, 18:46 UTC228 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну и июль выдался. Капец 😅Очень экстравертный. За пару недель общения случилось больше, чем за предыдущие полгода. Кажется, я нащупала пределы своих возможностей. Последние два дня восстанавливала батарейку на заливе. Тупо молчала. Ходила, ела, спала, читала, смотрела на море. И много думала. Среди прочего — о том, какая у меня сейчас классная бадди-группа. Идём уже второй спринт, асинхронно - без созвонов, прост

🔥107

26 Jul 2026, 08:26 UTC244 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Настроения пост. Вчера на Елагином был фестиваль уличных театров. Весь день была жара. В парке было много небольших площадок, переходили от одной к другой. В финальной сцене одного из спектаклей искали кандидата на вакансию заклинателя дождя. Вызывали добровольцев из зала и устроили вступительные испытания. И именно в этот момент пошёл дождь. Ливень. Заклинания сработали 🪄✨Очень эффектно было) Актёры доиграли до к

🔥75👍4

23 Jul 2026, 14:18 UTC283 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Небольшой ребрендинг😁 Решила, что к своим 38 годикам я уже и так достаточно умная и учёная. И можно теперь побыть не только умной, но и счастливой. Начала вот прямо вчера. Поэтому «Настя учится» превращается в «Настя про счастье». Поисследуем эту тему. По крайней мере, до следующего экзистенциального кризиса 🙃

19🔥10😁2

20 Jul 2026, 18:16 UTC315 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Улов с прогулок. Детали #Петербург.

9🔥7👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Nastia_notes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 531,511 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Настя про счастье” (@Nastia_notes), 291 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nastia_notes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.