Channel
@Nasti_mtg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
61subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002126803640 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nasti_mtg |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nasti_mtg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:39 | 61 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 59 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 60 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 60 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 9 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
57 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 22 | 38.6% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 26.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 14.0% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 8.77% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 7.02% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.75% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 1.75% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 1.75% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2025 to 4 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔊Я тут осознала одну вещь… Мне вообще не страшно было: - работать с людьми - управлять командой - решать сложные ситуации Но мне страшно… выложить рилс Просто вдуматься 😅 И это какой-то новый уровень выхода из зоны комфорта Но, наверное, в этом и есть смысл Делать то, где ты пока не уверена Буду делится своими мыслями и страхами тут 🫣 Про ошибки продвижения малого бизнеса вам так и не рассказала 🙊
🔥8
Signed Анастасия
Разобрать для вас самые частые ошибки продвижения малого бизнеса ?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Анастасия
Кстати, про работу. Сейчас я плотно работаю с кондитерами. И вот пример одной из них ➡️ Анна К Новому году мы с ней не делали ничего сложного. 🟣Никаких запусков. 🟣Никакой рекламы. 🟣Никаких «воронок». Мы просто выстроили логику: – что именно продавать – в каком формате – в какие даты Вот что получилось по факту: 💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜 29 новогодних заказов – 4 набора капкейков – 6 «картошек»-конфет – 5 пряничных домиков – 2 м…
❤1👏1🔥1
Signed Анастасия
Давно ты чувствовал себя живым? Я почти всегда работаю. Везде. И нет я не жалуюсь. Я правда люблю то, что делаю, поэтому могу быть в этом бесконечно.🤩 Но в этом потоке есть один момент. Рано или поздно ты будто перестаёшь чувствовать себя живым. Не уставшим - нет. А именно… выключенным. Как будто всё идёт, задачи решаются, жизнь движется - а ты на автопилоте.😳 💜Работала сегодня за столом напротив окна и в какой-то…
❤3👍1🔥1
Signed Анастасия
Video message, posted without a caption
Signed Анастасия
Праздник или сплошной дедлайн? Чувствуйте чем пахнет? Мандаринами? Неееет… паникой! В России Новый год - не про «уют и свечи», как где-нибудь в Европе. У нас это режим: «не успел до 31 декабря? Проиграл!». Маркетинг это отлично знает.😄 И, конечно, жмет именно туда. Разберём, из чего состоит ежегодный психоз: 🤩«После праздников» как форма анестезии Вся страна живет с ощущением, что 31 декабря в 23:59 мир схлопне…
🔥8👍3💩1
Signed Анастасия
Это был лучший круиз за навигацию! А может все годы работы… Для меня общепит это не про еду и сервис👌 А в первую очередь про людей! Каждый рейс индивидуален благодаря каждому гостю на борту И этот был особенный Метрдотель обычно не обслуживает столы, но в этот раз так совпало, что стол у меня был. Я познакомилась с прекрасными людьми. С ними было супер комфортно каждый день, каждый сервис. А расставались мы со…
❤9❤🔥2
Signed Анастасия
С кайфом 🤟
❤🔥4🔥4
Signed Анастасия
Photo, posted without a caption
🕊5❤2
Signed Анастасия
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Анастасия
Изменяю Рене на выезде в Ермаково. Только цсс…🤫 никому не говорите
❤🔥2🙈1
Signed Анастасия
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Nasti_mtg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Разобрать для вас самые частые ошибки продвижения малого бизнеса ?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2025 to 4 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“С воды в трафик|Анастасия” (@Nasti_mtg), 61 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nasti_mtg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.