Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Não Oficial Armazém Newman LM🇧🇷

Channel

Não Oficial Armazém Newman LM🇧🇷

@Naooficialarmazemnewmanlm

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

791subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001590384968
TypeChannel
Username@Naooficialarmazemnewmanlm
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Naooficialarmazemnewmanlm

Previous handles

@Naooficialarmazemnewmanlm was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@Naooficialarmazemnewmanlm
held 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

Growth

788791789.57 August 2026 — 788 subscribers8 August 2026 — 788 subscribers22 August 2026 — 790 subscribers30 August 2026 — 791 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 788–791 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 04:04791+1
22 Aug 2026, 13:32790+2
8 Aug 2026, 01:46788no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:06788first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

104 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3028.8%
👍1312.5%
❤109.62%
⚡98.65%
🥰76.73%
👀65.77%
🔥65.77%
🙉65.77%
💩54.81%
💅43.85%
😐43.85%
🖕32.88%
👌10.962%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC314 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2026/07/24/us-sending-envoys-question-brazilian-electoral-system-officials-say/

10 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC568 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @desotericamentePhoto

"Sonhei que vi minha avó materna sentada à beira de uma piscina, que também era um rio. Na vida real, ela havia sido vítima da doença de Alzheimer e, antes de morrer, regredira a um estado de semiconsciência. No sonho, ela também havia perdido a capacidade de autocontrole. Sua região genital estava discretamente exposta; tinha a aparência de um espesso emaranhado de pelos. Ela se acariciava distraidamente. Ela caminh…

💩5🔥5

Signed Desotericamente🔮

10 Jul 2026, 05:58 UTC438 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @filhosdeodinFile

Nós queremos lutar. O enforcado⚡️⚡️

7 Jul 2026, 20:46 UTC621 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

É possível considerar um cenário em que os EUA e China se aliem novamente? "EUA destroem o Irã e como retaliação Israel é destruido" "Turquia abandona OTAN e se junta ao Irã." "Como movimento de distração Trump entrega Taiwan a China." "Japão temendo o EUA se volta em um processo de nacionalismo independente" "Alemanha se alia a EUA e Ucrânia temendo um avanço russo" "Polônia desconfia que OTAN o trate como uma…

😐4🔥1

7 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTC461 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @desotericamentePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁6

5 Jul 2026, 22:07 UTC616 viewsread 8 August 2026

Não tem toque, não tem drible, e só ataca cruzando para um time que só tem girafa... Não existe mais o "Brasil" na seleção brasileira. Parabéns Cabo Verde, vocês perderam mas perderam com honra.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Naooficialarmazemnewmanlm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Não Oficial Armazém Newman LM🇧🇷” (@Naooficialarmazemnewmanlm), 791 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Naooficialarmazemnewmanlm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.