Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Naman iplus Cricket Prediction 🏏

@Namanpachori

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic Β· Observations Β· Also posting the same content Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

157,304subscribers

-544 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001144311973
TypeChannel
Username@Namanpachori
Descriptionπ™‡π˜Όπ™Žπ™ 𝙄𝙋𝙇 π˜Όπ˜Ύπ˜Ύπ™π™π˜Όπ˜Ύπ™” 58/62 π™ˆπ˜Όπ™π˜Ύπ™ƒ π™‹π˜Όπ™Žπ™Žβœ”οΈ π™‡π˜Όπ™Žπ™ π˜½π˜½π™‡ π˜Όπ˜Ύπ˜Ύπ™π™π˜Όπ˜Ύπ™” 40/44 π™ˆπ˜Όπ™π˜Ύπ™ƒ π™‹π˜Όπ™Žπ™Žβœ”οΈ 𝙁𝙍𝙀𝙀 π™ˆπ˜Όπ™π˜Ύπ™ƒ π™‹π™π™€π˜Ώπ™„π˜Ύπ™π™„π™Šπ™‰ & π™π˜Όπ™‰π™π˜Όπ™Žπ™” π™π™€π˜Όπ™ˆ π˜Ύπ™ƒπ˜Όπ™‰π™‰π™€π™‡ 🏏 Promo - @Naman_Dubai
CreatedBetween 1 May 2017 and 30 June 2020β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Namanpachori

Topic

Sports β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts β€” open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@namantyagiofficial/30266 May 2026, 14:21 UTC@Namanpachori/8499 Β· this entry6 May 2026, 14:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@namantyagiofficial/303216 May 2026, 14:10 UTC@Namanpachori/8505 Β· this entry16 May 2026, 14:10 UTC1.00under a minute
@namantyagiofficial/303822 May 2026, 14:27 UTC@Namanpachori/8512 Β· this entry22 May 2026, 14:27 UTC1.00under a minute
@namantyagiofficial/303923 May 2026, 14:01 UTC@Namanpachori/8513 Β· this entry23 May 2026, 14:01 UTC1.00under a minute
@namantyagiofficial/304126 May 2026, 14:13 UTC@Namanpachori/8515 Β· this entry26 May 2026, 14:13 UTC1.00under a minute
@namantyagiofficial/304227 May 2026, 14:06 UTC@Namanpachori/8516 Β· this entry27 May 2026, 14:06 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@namantyagiofficial19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@namantyagiofficial (13–6)
@Match_Football18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutesthis entry (18–0)
@Tennis_Match18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 secondsthis entry (18–0)
@Jaanvi_and_Maanvi_Cricket_Report15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (15–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp β€” in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 13 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

β€œPublished first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 May 2026 to 31 May 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @Jaanvi_and_Maanvi_Cricket_Report. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy Β· clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through β€” we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable β€” 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times β€” 60%, no better than a coin flip β€” because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying β€” a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story β€” and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

157,304157,848157,5767 August 2026 β€” 157,848 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 157,772 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 157,662 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 157,511 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 157,404 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 157,304 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 5 days, net -544. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 157,222–157,930 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:52157,304-100
11 Aug 2026, 06:44157,404-107
10 Aug 2026, 06:07157,511-151
9 Aug 2026, 03:52157,662-110
8 Aug 2026, 03:01157,772-76
7 Aug 2026, 09:45157,848first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
β‰ˆ1,330
Links
β‰ˆ110

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

31 May 2026, 14:31 UTCβ‰ˆ15,700 viewsread 12 August 2026

πŸ†INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE 2026πŸ† FINAL 🏏 ROYALS CHALLENGERS BANGLORE VS GUJRAT TITANS MATCH WINNER PREDICTION ➑️ BANGLORE OR RCB WILL COME BELOW 20 PAISA Verified Channel ka Link Share Kardo Sab Dosto ko πŸ‘‡ https://t.me/+qcD5LdmqYgYwMGE0 #NAMAN_CRICKET βœ… Λ’α΅‰α΅ƒΚ³αΆœΚ° ᡒⁿ ᡀᡉˑᡉᡍʳᡃᡐ

29 May 2026, 14:17 UTCβ‰ˆ16,300 viewsread 12 August 2026

πŸ†INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE 2026πŸ† QUALIFIER 2ND 🏏 RAJASTHAN ROYALS VS GUJRAT TITANS MATCH WINNER PREDICTION ➑️ GUJRAT OR GT WILL COME BELOW 20 PAISA Verified Channel ka Link Share Kardo Sab Dosto ko πŸ‘‡ https://t.me/+qcD5LdmqYgYwMGE0 #NAMAN_CRICKET βœ… Λ’α΅‰α΅ƒΚ³αΆœΚ° ᡒⁿ ᡀᡉˑᡉᡍʳᡃᡐ

27 May 2026, 14:06 UTCβ‰ˆ15,500 viewsread 12 August 2026

πŸ†INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE 2026πŸ† ELEMINATION 1ST 🏏 RAJASTHAN ROYALS VS SUNRISERS HYDERABAD MATCH WINNER PREDICTION ➑️ HYDERABAD OR SRH WILL COME BELOW 20 PAISA Verified Channel ka Link Share Kardo Sab Dosto ko πŸ‘‡ https://t.me/+qcD5LdmqYgYwMGE0 #NAMAN_CRICKET βœ… Λ’α΅‰α΅ƒΚ³αΆœΚ° ᡒⁿ ᡀᡉˑᡉᡍʳᡃᡐ

26 May 2026, 14:13 UTCβ‰ˆ15,300 viewsread 12 August 2026

πŸ†INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE 2026πŸ† QUALIFER 1ST 🏏 GUJRAT TITANS VS ROYAL CHALLENGERS BANGLORE MATCH WINNER PREDICTION ➑️ GUJRAT OR GT WILL COME BELOW 20 PAISA Verified Channel ka Link Share Kardo Sab Dosto ko πŸ‘‡ https://t.me/+qcD5LdmqYgYwMGE0 #NAMAN_CRICKET βœ… Λ’α΅‰α΅ƒΚ³αΆœΚ° ᡒⁿ ᡀᡉˑᡉᡍʳᡃᡐ

24 May 2026, 10:21 UTCβ‰ˆ10,600 viewsread 12 August 2026

πŸ†INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE 2026πŸ† 69TH T20 🏏 MUMBAI INDIANS VS RAJASTHAN ROYALS MATCH WINNER PREDICTION ➑️ MUMBAI OR MI WILL COME BELOW 20 PAISA Verified Channel ka Link Share Kardo Sab Dosto ko πŸ‘‡ https://t.me/+qcD5LdmqYgYwMGE0 #NAMAN_CRICKET βœ… Λ’α΅‰α΅ƒΚ³αΆœΚ° ᡒⁿ ᡀᡉˑᡉᡍʳᡃᡐ

23 May 2026, 14:01 UTCβ‰ˆ8,810 viewsread 12 August 2026

πŸ†INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE 2026πŸ† 68TH T20 🏏 LUCKNOW SUPER KINGS VS PUNJAB KINGS MATCH WINNER PREDICTION ➑️ PUNJAB OR PKBS WILL COME BELOW 20 PAISA Verified Channel ka Link Share Kardo Sab Dosto ko πŸ‘‡ https://t.me/+qcD5LdmqYgYwMGE0 #NAMAN_CRICKET βœ… Λ’α΅‰α΅ƒΚ³αΆœΚ° ᡒⁿ ᡀᡉˑᡉᡍʳᡃᡐ

22 May 2026, 14:27 UTCβ‰ˆ7,970 viewsread 12 August 2026

πŸ†INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE 2026πŸ† 67TH T20 🏏 SUNRISERS HYDERABAD VS ROYAL CHALLENGERS BANGLORE MATCH WINNER PREDICTION ➑️ BANGLORE OR RCB WILL COME BELOW 20 PAISA Verified Channel ka Link Share Kardo Sab Dosto ko πŸ‘‡ https://t.me/+qcD5LdmqYgYwMGE0 #NAMAN_CRICKET βœ… Λ’α΅‰α΅ƒΚ³αΆœΚ° ᡒⁿ ᡀᡉˑᡉᡍʳᡃᡐ

21 May 2026, 14:16 UTCβ‰ˆ7,640 viewsread 12 August 2026

πŸ†INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE 2026πŸ† 66TH T20 🏏 CHENNAI SUPER KINGS VS GUJRAT TITANS MATCH WINNER PREDICTION ➑️ GUJARAT OR GT WILL COME BELOW 20 PAISA Verified Channel ka Link Share Kardo Sab Dosto ko πŸ‘‡ https://t.me/+qcD5LdmqYgYwMGE0 #NAMAN_CRICKET βœ… Λ’α΅‰α΅ƒΚ³αΆœΚ° ᡒⁿ ᡀᡉˑᡉᡍʳᡃᡐ

20 May 2026, 14:07 UTCβ‰ˆ7,190 viewsread 12 August 2026

πŸ†INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE 2026πŸ† 65TH T20 🏏 MUMBAI INDIAN VS KOLKATA KNIGHT RIDERS MATCH WINNER PREDICTION ➑️ KOLKATA OR KKR WILL COME BELOW 20 PAISA Verified Channel ka Link Share Kardo Sab Dosto ko πŸ‘‡ https://t.me/+qcD5LdmqYgYwMGE0 #NAMAN_CRICKET βœ… Λ’α΅‰α΅ƒΚ³αΆœΚ° ᡒⁿ ᡀᡉˑᡉᡍʳᡃᡐ

19 May 2026, 14:05 UTCβ‰ˆ7,030 viewsread 12 August 2026

πŸ†INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE 2026πŸ† 64TH T20 🏏 RAJASTHAN ROYALS VS LUCKNOW SUPER GIANTS MATCH WINNER PREDICTION ➑️ RAJASTHAN OR RR WILL COME BELOW 20 PAISA Verified Channel ka Link Share Kardo Sab Dosto ko πŸ‘‡ https://t.me/+qcD5LdmqYgYwMGE0 #NAMAN_CRICKET βœ… Λ’α΅‰α΅ƒΚ³αΆœΚ° ᡒⁿ ᡀᡉˑᡉᡍʳᡃᡐ

18 May 2026, 14:10 UTCβ‰ˆ6,690 viewsread 12 August 2026

πŸ†INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE 2026πŸ† 63TH T20 🏏 CHENNAI SUPER KINGS VS SUNRISERS HYDERABAD MATCH WINNER PREDICTION ➑️ HYDERABAD OR SRH WILL COME BELOW 20 PAISA Verified Channel ka Link Share Kardo Sab Dosto ko πŸ‘‡ https://t.me/+qcD5LdmqYgYwMGE0 #NAMAN_CRICKET βœ… Λ’α΅‰α΅ƒΚ³αΆœΚ° ᡒⁿ ᡀᡉˑᡉᡍʳᡃᡐ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Namanpachori. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 261,862 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œNaman iplus Cricket Prediction πŸβ€ (@Namanpachori), 157,304 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Namanpachori.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.