Channel
@Nakdcuddle
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001644848267 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nakdcuddle |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 17 October 2022 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nakdcuddle |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 3 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 3 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 October 2022 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯° | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2022 to 15 November 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
sebelumnya gue minta maaf ga bisa cht lo semua satu persatu dan gue ga ngasih feedback belakangan ini π tapi gue pnya urusan pribadi yang ga terduga bahkan sangat mendadak, karna ini hal pribadi jadi ga gue sebutin apa itu Thanks udah jadi mutual gue walaupun ga lama btw lo semua udah gue remove dari sini, see u mootssss
π₯°1
Sticker, posted without a caption
ANJING
wita WAKTU INDONESIA TERIAK ANJING
Sticker, posted without a caption
00.00 still love u (?)
Sticker, posted without a caption
π About ValΓ©rie π€ βββ ππ° cool π€ #Evaluasi. pretty girl π€ γ’γͺγΌ, GORGEOUSSS π€ πͺ§Λ youβre so super duper gorgeous & elegant girl π§π»ββ π€ #π ππ JAMET TAPI KEREN π€ #clΓ€. cancii π€ #vrs pretty and cute π€ #aru LUCUKKK π€ #rkaf pretty π€ #π©ππ’π¨ cantik π€ #LCA cantik π€ #π‘π¦ππ±π cantik dan terlihat elegant π€ #π«κie . girlbosss ππ€π»π€π» π€ Cheerful π€ #abim. You look so cute and pretty π€ α’..α’ ΰ£ͺΛ #μμ΄λ¦° ΰ£ͺ π₯ so pretty and cute π€ #β¦
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
@donediving mootssss
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Nakdcuddle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
what do you think about me ?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2022 to 15 November 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ’π΄πΆπ΄ on youβ (@Nakdcuddle), 3 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nakdcuddle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.