Channel
@NakHabiskanMasterPhd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
15,521subscribers
-80 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001516311860 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NakHabiskanMasterPhd |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NakHabiskanMasterPhd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 15,521 | -11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 15,532 | -16 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 15,548 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 15,558 | -12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 15,570 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 15,580 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 15,581 | -14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:11 | 15,595 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 15,600 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 15,601 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (23 July 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 37,012 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
📚 "Saya dah ada tajuk... tapi bila nak tulis Literature Review, semuanya macam tak bersambung." Itulah perkara pertama yang dikongsikan oleh Subaryani semasa sesi 1-on-1 Coaching. Framework awal sudah dibina dan pemboleh ubah telah dikenal pasti. Namun apabila mula menulis Bab 2, beliau sukar menghubungkan setiap pemboleh ubah, mengenal pasti research gap, dan membina hujah yang benar-benar disokong oleh evidence.…
Lulus Proposal Defense (PD) bukan jaminan tesis anda dah selamat dan sempurna. PD cuma pintu masuk, perjuangan sebenar ialah pembuktian dapatan dan penulisan ke viva nanti. Jangan terlalu selesa sampai terhenti draf tesis anda masa cuti sem ni. 👇 Siapa kat sini yang dah lulus PD tapi sekarang rasa 'stuck' nak teruskan bab seterusnya?
🛑 Dah 5 Kali Tukar Tajuk, Tapi Masih Kena Betulkan? Ramai student ingat bila proposal kena reject, penyelesaiannya ialah tukar ayat tajuk. Tambah perkataan sikit. Ubah susunan sikit. Hantar semula. Tapi bila supervisor baca... masih kena betulkan. Masalahnya bukan pada ayat tajuk. Masalahnya ialah research direction yang masih belum jelas. Kalau hala tuju kajian kabur, tajuk, objektif dan methodology pun susa…
🤯 Baru Daftar Master/PhD, Tapi Tak Tahu Nak Mula Dari Mana? Masuk semester pertama memang boleh rasa blur. Jurnal dah mula banyak. Supervisor dah minta draf tajuk. Tapi masih tak pasti langkah pertama yang patut dibuat. Kalau foundation tak betul dari awal, perjalanan research boleh jadi lebih panjang daripada yang sepatutnya. Dalam Strategi Research Proposal, anda akan belajar bagaimana: 🔹 Menyusun research di…
⏳ Tiada Guide Nak Buat Apa Dulu? Ramai student pernah alami situasi ni. Buka laptop. Buka Word. Lepas sejam... masih tak tahu nak mula dari mana. Bukan sebab tak rajin. Tetapi sebab belum ada direction yang jelas. Bila tahu langkah demi langkah yang perlu dibuat, proses menulis jadi lebih teratur dan tak lagi rasa macam meneka. Dalam Strategi Research Proposal, anda akan belajar bagaimana: 🔹 Menyusun hala tuj…
!! KINI DIBUKA: PENDAFTARAN STRATEGI RESEARCH PROPOSAL (SESI SHAH ALAM) !! Bagi anda yang penat pusing-pusing tukar tajuk tapi proposal masih dipulangkan fakulti, pendaftaran untuk sesi fizikal terbaharu kini dibuka rasmi! Kami pindahkan lokasi ke Shah Alam Seksyen 7 pada 22 Ogos ini khas untuk memberi ruang kepada rakan-rakan penyelidik yang terlepas sesi Putrajaya sebelum ini. . Sesi ini akan mendedahkan 4-Step D…
📚 Baca Jurnal Berhari-Hari, Tapi Confirm Ke Bab 2 Tu Dah Betul? Ramai student sangka bila dah baca banyak jurnal, maksudnya Bab 2 dah siap. Hakikatnya, ramai juga yang bila jumpa supervisor terus dengar ayat... "Ini bukan Literature Review. Ini cuma ringkasan artikel." Masalahnya bukan sebab anda kurang membaca. Tetapi sebab anda belum tahu bagaimana nak kenal pasti research gap dan menghubungkan pembacaan denga…
🚨 JANGAN BIARKAN VIVA SEBENAR JADI TEMPAT PERTAMA TAJUK ANDA DIUJI! 🎓 Proposal asyik kena reject sebab isu tak kuat? Research gap masih kabur? Atau supervisor selalu minta buat semula? Daripada terus meneka sendiri, bawa proposal anda ke Strategi Research Proposal (SRP) di Shah Alam. Selepas sambutan yang sangat baik di Putrajaya, kini Dr Arman Shah kembali berkongsi strategi membina proposal yang lebih tersusun d…
!! TERLEPAS SESI PUTRAJAYA HARI TU? JOM JUMPA DI SHAH ALAM 22 OGOS NI! !! 🚀 Ramai yang WhatsApp kami mengadu kecewa sebab tak sempat nak lock slot masa sesi Putrajaya lepas akibat kuota dewan penuh. Jangan risau, kami dengar permintaan anda! Kali ini kami bawa sesi fizikal Strategi Research Proposal berdekatan dengan anda di Shah Alam Seksyen 7. Lupakan seketika kelas online yang membosankan dan jom ambil aura be…
ATAS PERMINTAAN RAMAI: STRATEGI RESEARCH PROPOSAL KINI DI SHAH ALAM Siapa yang terlepas sesi fizikal di Putrajaya sebelum ini, ini berita gembira untuk anda. . Selepas menerima banyak permintaan daripada pelajar Master & PhD di kawasan Klang Valley dan Selangor, Dr Arman Shah akan dibawakan khas ke Shah Alam Seksyen 7! . Sesi 3 jam ini disusun untuk membantu anda yang draf proposalnya masih tersangkut, tajuk kerap d…
📢 STRATEGI RESEARCH PROPOSAL KEMBALI LAGI, KALI INI DI SHAH ALAM! Ramai yang terlepas sesi SRP di Putrajaya sebelum ini dan bertanya bila sesi seterusnya akan diadakan. Alhamdulillah, kali ini kita jumpa di Shah Alam, Seksyen 7! 🙌 Dalam sesi fizikal bersama Dr Arman Shah, anda akan belajar bagaimana menyusun proposal Bab 1 hingga Bab 3 supaya direction research lebih jelas dan lebih bersedia untuk proposal defence…
"Saya dah kumpul banyak artikel... tapi saya masih tak tahu artikel mana yang perlu digunakan." Itulah perkara pertama yang dikongsikan oleh Puan Komathi semasa sesi 1-on-1 Coaching. Ramai pelajar menyangka semakin banyak artikel dikumpulkan, semakin mudah untuk menulis SLR. Hakikatnya, mereka mula keliru apabila perlu memilih artikel yang benar-benar relevan, menyokong Research Question, dan membantu membina nove…
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @NakHabiskanMasterPhd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 999,418 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NakHabiskanMasterPhd” (@NakHabiskanMasterPhd), 15,521 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NakHabiskanMasterPhd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.