Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

NajlNeuro

@NajlNeuro

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,588subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001088404700
TypeChannel
Username@NajlNeuro
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NajlNeuro

Growth

1,5881,5931,590.56 August 2026 — 1,593 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,593 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,592 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,589 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,588 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,587–1,594 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:391,588-1
9 Aug 2026, 12:021,589-3
6 Aug 2026, 20:201,592-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:351,593no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:421,593first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.0%
avg views ÷ 1,588 subscribers
Avg views / post
302
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total1,811
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 09:51 UTC285 viewsread 7 August 2026

چرا مصطفی رحیمی امروز هنوز مهم است؟ مصطفی رحیمی از آن روشنفکرانی بود که هرگز «مد روز» نشد؛ و شاید دقیقاً به همین دلیل، امروز دوباره باید به او برگشت. رحیمی نه رهبر سیاسی بود، نه نظریه‌پرداز بزرگ، نه صاحب مکتب. اما یک چیز داشت که در تاریخ روشنفکری ایران کمیاب است: وفاداری سرسخت به انسانِ واقعی، نه انسانِ انتزاعی. در نگاه رحیمی، سیاست نه از ایدئولوژی شروع می‌شود، نه از وعده‌های آینده، نه از نجات تاریخی. سیاست از رنج ا

1 Aug 2026, 22:41 UTC303 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔻 *گفتگو با دکتر عبدالرحمن نجل رحیم*، پزشک، متخصص مغز و اعصاب و پژوهشگر علوم اعصاب هستیم. ایشان پس از تحصیل پزشکی و تخصص در ایران، برای ادامه پژوهش‌های نوروساینس به انگلستان رفت و در سال ۱۹۷۱ دکتری نوروساینس خود را از دانشگاه شفیلد دریافت کرد. 🔻در این گفت‌وگو، از تفاوت نگاه نوروساینس و روانکاوی به ذهن و آگاهی آغاز می‌کنیم و به نقش بدن، زبان، روابط انسانی و بستر اجتماعی در شکل‌گیری ذهن می‌پردازیم. سپس درباره نسبت زیس

10 Jul 2026, 16:36 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 7 August 2026

«شب‌های سفید بیمارستان و من»؛ نمایش آثار بیمارستانی جواد مجابی در ایرانمهر بیمارستان ایرانمهر همزمان با بازگشایی نشست‌های مغزپژوهی اجتماعی (نوروساینس اجتماعی)، میزبان نمایشگاه «شب‌های سفید بیمارستان و من» خواهد بود؛ مجموعه‌ای از طراحی‌ها و نقاشی‌های جواد مجابی که در روزهای بستری و دوران درمان او در بیمارستان خلق شده‌اند. این آثار، روایت بصری تجربه زیسته هنرمندی هستند که در مواجهه با بیماری نیز آفرینش را متوقف نکرد و

7 Jun 2026, 18:23 UTC639 viewsread 7 August 2026

زیرا اگر این امکان به طور کامل از میان برود، فرهنگ جنگ نه فقط بر سرزمین‌ها و بدن‌ها، بلکه بر خودِ افق اندیشیدن ما نیز پیروز شده است. و به نظرم این جمله با روح تمام بحثی که طی این گفت‌وگو شکل گرفت سازگار است: مقاومت نه از موضع یقین مطلق، بلکه از موضع آگاهی به شکنندگی انسان و دشواری حفظ انسانیت در زمانه جنگ.

7 Jun 2026, 18:23 UTC189 viewsread 7 August 2026

از نوعی «عادت بدنی ادراک» سخن می‌گویيم. بدن یاد گرفته است ؛ منتظر خطر باشد؛ به آینده با تردید نگاه کند ؛ خبرها را از زاویه تهدید بخواند؛ دیگری را بالقوه خطرناک ببیند؛ و امنیت را بیش از آزادی و گشودگی طلب کند. اینها فقط عقاید سیاسی نیستند؛ بلکه به تعبیر مرلوپونتی به بخشی از «طرز بودن در جهان» تبدیل شده‌اند. شاید به همین دلیل باشد که تغییر فرهنگ جنگ بسیار دشوارتر از پایان یک جنگ نظامی است. زیرا آتش‌بس را می‌توان در یک

7 Jun 2026, 18:23 UTC256 viewsread 7 August 2026

در این چرخه، تخیل سیاسی اسیر قدرت‌های موجود می‌شود و نمی‌تواند افق دیگری را تصور کند. شاید مهم‌ترین سهم نظری اين پروژه این باشد که نشان دهد: فرهنگ جنگ فقط بدن‌ها را اسیر نمی‌کند؛ تخیل سیاسی را نیز اسیر می‌کند. و از این رو مقاومت فقط مقاومت در برابر خشونت نیست؛ بلکه مقاومت در برابر این باور است که تنها گزینه‌های ممکن همان قدرت‌های موجودند. البته این مسیر تضمینی برای موفقیت ندارد. تاریخ پر است از شکست چنین کوشش‌هایی. ا

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NajlNeuro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 287,867 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NajlNeuro” (@NajlNeuro), 1,588 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NajlNeuro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.