敬告所有叮咚鸡子民 我的名字是奶伦-耶噶 正透过叮咚鸡之力,与所有叮咚鸡子民对话。 我将化身叮咚鸡巨人发动地鸣,痛打害人贱种、贱逼。左手🫲🏻一个大逼斗打烂发水煮牛肉的贱种,右手🫱🏻一个上钩拳 一个耗油跟,一拳打死 @Me0wt1n 发屎蛆的婊子妈,再一个砸拳👊🏻,把贱逼的的脑浆打出来洗脚,最后来个巨人重踏🦶,在把这丧门星的的杂种全家风风光光送走。 发屎死妈蛆 @Me0wt1n 找到了,哈哈,他全家死光了
😁38❤9🖕3🥰3😢3👍2👎1💘1

Channel
@NaiJiangTV
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
391subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001265608436 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NaiJiangTV |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NaiJiangTV |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 22:56 | 391 | +1 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 390 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 391 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:34 | 393 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 390 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 392 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 393 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 393 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
73 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 38 | 52.1% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 13.7% | |
| 🖕 | 6 | 8.22% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 8.22% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 6.85% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 4.11% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 2.74% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.37% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.37% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2024 to 18 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
敬告所有叮咚鸡子民 我的名字是奶伦-耶噶 正透过叮咚鸡之力,与所有叮咚鸡子民对话。 我将化身叮咚鸡巨人发动地鸣,痛打害人贱种、贱逼。左手🫲🏻一个大逼斗打烂发水煮牛肉的贱种,右手🫱🏻一个上钩拳 一个耗油跟,一拳打死 @Me0wt1n 发屎蛆的婊子妈,再一个砸拳👊🏻,把贱逼的的脑浆打出来洗脚,最后来个巨人重踏🦶,在把这丧门星的的杂种全家风风光光送走。 发屎死妈蛆 @Me0wt1n 找到了,哈哈,他全家死光了
😁38❤9🖕3🥰3😢3👍2👎1💘1
https://discord.gg/bmM55hqtjd
🥰3😱2
奶酱🥛的小窝🛖 pinned an audio file
大雨磅礴 一侠客、一剑、一身蓑衣, 只得见 一女子、一伞、一身素服, 相望、相识、十载如梦, 女子、重疾、欲愈须取大强者心头之血, 大侠欲言而止于唇,背身而走。 年关将至,坊间传闻有一魔头,嗜杀成性屠戮百余人,朝廷欲平民心,取魔头首级者,赏黄金百两,众侠客揭榜,欲杀魔头。 笠日,追杀至魔头老巢,魔头大笑,剑指八方,众侠客怒而斥之,唯有一女子掩面痛哭。 大道在前,无怨无悔,宁负天下而不负我!言闭,怒目而视,一夫当关 万夫莫开! 尸横遍野,大侠虽如风中残烛却屹立不倒,回首而望,虽有千言万语却止于喉,只得 一望、一笑、一手扶去她眼旁泪痕。 大雨磅礴 一女子、一伞、一身素服, 而不见 一大侠、一剑、一身蓑衣。
👍3
奶酱🥛的小窝🛖 pinned «奶酱点评三低人士精选集»
你俩不自卑,你俩复制粘贴什么车轱辘话呢?
🖕2
是的我自卑,我袒护三低人士,我觉得三低人士太伟大了。
🖕1
这不就是三低人士逻辑吗?严于律人,宽于律己。
就我11岁的时候,喜欢用呢
我又不自卑,你觉得我会和你一样破防?
你就是妥妥三低人士 低素质 低智商 低视野 你瞎骂到现在,无非不就是因为我没像你们三低人士一样舔美骂共。这就是三低人士的素质。 成天还什么美国好中国坏,见不得别人骂美国,这不就是美版小粉红,你自己评价下这种意淫民族和国家伟大的智商吧。 还天天批斗粉蛆呢,这不就是中国底层和美国底层...啊对不起啊,你连美国底层都算不上,就是中国底层互害。 就你们三低人士也想象不到啊,中美高精尖人士在国际大公司里面谈笑风生,都是中美哪发达,哪利益多去哪。 中共黑料如数家珍,英语是一句不会,天天就是和舔中共的三低人士和舔美国的三低人士对骂。
你们三低人士不要代表这个那个,上一个要代表全世界,你这个又代表其他人,你现实中都啥也不是呢,还代表谁呢? 还有你就是说你们三低人士的逻辑吧,瞎骂到现在都说不明白你的观点,不就是想证明一把你不是猴,不是三低人士。 就是你们这个低素质,就是最好的三低证明器,没受过高等教育,常年混迹于社会底层。
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NaiJiangTV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@NaiJiangTV named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“奶酱🥛的小窝🛖” (@NaiJiangTV), 391 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NaiJiangTV.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.